Skip to content

Treatment of Buccal Ginvigal Recessions With the Tunnel Technique in Conjunction With Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Treatment of Buccal Ginvigal Recessions With the Tunnel Technique in Conjunction With Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05436002
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-06-28
Start date
2022-10-15
Completion date
2024-10-15
Last updated
2022-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid

Keywords

cross-linked hyaluronic acid, tunnel technique, gingival recession

Brief summary

To evaluate the outcomes of buccal gengival recession type 1 (RT1) treated with the tunnel technique in conjunction with a cross-linked hyaluronic acid and subepithelial palatal connective tissue grafts.

Detailed description

To evaluate the outcomes of buccal gengival recession type 1 (RT1) treated with the tunnel technique in conjunction with a cross-linked hyaluronic acid and subepithelial palatal connective tissue grafts. To evaluate the esthetic outcome as perceived by periodontists, using the root coverage esthetic score (RES). Test Group - Tunnel technique in conjunction with a cross-linked hyaluronic acid and subepithelial palatal connective tissue grafts. Control Group - Tunnel technique and subepithelial palatal connective tissue grafts.

Interventions

DEVICEWith Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid

Without Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid

Sponsors

University of Lisbon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* None of the patients were smokers and all were systemically healthy without any signs of periodontal disease. * Each patient had to display at least one ginvigal recession (RT1) of a depth of ≥ 2 mm. * Patients exhibited an adequate level of oral hygiene evidenced by a full- mouth plaque score (FMPS) \< 25%39 and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) \< 25%.

Exclusion criteria

* Smokers * Gingival recesstion RT 2 or RT 3 (Cairo 2011).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gingival margin6 month after surgeryScore 0: failure of root coverage (gingival margin apical or equal to the baseline recession); Score 3: partial root coverage; Score 6: complete root coverage with no detectable CEJ.
Marginal tissue contour6 month after surgeryScore 0: irregular gingival margin (it does not follow CEJ); Score 1: proper marginal contour/scalloped gingival margin (following CEJ).
Soft tissue texture6 month after surgeryScore 0: presence of scar formation and/or keloid-like appearance; Score 1: absence of scar or keloid formation.
Mucogingival junction6 month after surgeryScore 0: MGJ not aligned with MGJ on adjacent teeth; Score 1: MGJ aligned with MGJ on adjacent teeth.
Gingival color6 month after surgeryScore 0: color of tissue differs from gingival color on adjacent teeth; Score 1: normal color and integration with the adjacent soft tissues.

Contacts

Primary ContactVanessa Rodrigues, Dr
Vanessa_15_rodrigues@hotmail.com919950890

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026