Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test, Telerehabilitation
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to confirm the effectiveness of a mobile messenger-based home tele-rehabilitation protocol in patients who have undergone lung resection surgery. By analyzing the difference from the existing postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation, the investigators would like to propose a new pulmonary tele-rehabilitation protocol.
Interventions
12 supervised training sessions via a specific mobile messenger during four weeks. (3 sessions/week)
Usual care with only one educational session.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. A person who is suspected of lung cancer and is scheduled to undergo a thoracoscopic lung resection surgery. 2. men and women the age ≥65 years. 3. A person who understands the course of the clinical trial and signs the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients whose activity is restricted due to other diseases (e.g. osteoarthritis, spinal disease, cerebral infarction, etc.) 2. Patients who cannot test bioimpedance analysis due to the insertion of artificial pacemakers and defibrillators 3. A person who has difficulty judging himself/herself due to dementia, etc 4. Those enrolled in other clinical trials 5. A person deemed inappropriate to participate in this clinical trial under the judgement of the investigator. 6. A person who cannot use mobile messenger
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | Before surgery (Pre), Baseline (4 weeks after surgery), After intervention(8 weeks after surgery), Follow up(12 weeks after surgery) | Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) also referred to as a VO2 (oxygen consumption) test, is a specialized type of stress test or exercise test that measures participants exercise ability. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | Maximal inspiratory pressure measured using a handheld respiratory device. Higher values indicate stronger inspiratory muscles. Unit of Measure: cmH₂O |
| Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | Skeletal muscle index calculated by dividing appendicular skeletal muscle mass by height squared. Higher values indicate greater muscle mass. Unit of Measure: kg/m² |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised 30 years ago by Zigmond and Snaith to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients. The HADS is a fourteen item scale that generates: Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case) |
| Steps | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | As a physical activity, Counting participant's steps per a day with an activity tracker. Average number of steps per day for one week before surgery and after discharge. |
| EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group to measure health-related quality of life. It consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels: (1) no problems, (2) slight problems, (3) moderate problems, (4) severe problems, and (5) extreme problems. Responses are converted into a summary index score, which ranges from -0.281 to 1.000, based on country-specific value sets. Higher index scores indicate better health status, with 1.000 representing full health and values below 0 indicating health states considered worse than death. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 represents the best health imaginable and 0 represents the worst health imaginable. Higher VAS scores reflect |
| Ventilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope) | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | VE/VCO₂ slope measured during CPET. Lower values indicate better ventilatory efficiency. |
| Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | The peak expiratory flow (PEF) is a participant's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a participant's ability to breathe out air. It measures the airflow through the bronchi and thus the degree of obstruction in the airways. Peak expiratory flow is typically measured in units of liters per minute (L/min). |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the maximum amount of air a participant can forcibly exhale from lungs after fully inhaling. The unit is expressed in liters. |
| The Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the volume of air (in liters) exhaled in the first second during forced exhalation after maximal inspiration. |
| Whole-Body Phase Angle | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived phase angle (PA) is an alternative method to assess mortality risk. BIA is a simple, non-invasive technique that estimates body composition by measuring the opposition (impedance) to an applied current while passing through the body. Impedance consists of two components: resistance, which is the opposition to the flow of an alternating current through intra- and extracellular ionic solutions, and reactance, which is the delay in conduction as a result of capacitance by cell membranes and tissue interfaces. PA is regarded as a biological marker of cellular health, as it reflects cell mass, membrane integrity, and hydration status. PA has repeatedly proven to be a predictor of morbidity and mortality in various patient groups. |
| Grip Strength | Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up | Grip strength is a measure of muscular strength or the maximum force/tension generated by participant's forearm muscles using the Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. The force has been measured in kilograms. |
Countries
South Korea
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 96 participants were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 64 were randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group The Tele-rehabilitation group performs 12 training sessions during four weeks. (3 sessions/week)
Pulmonary Tele-Rehabilitation: 12 supervised training sessions via a specific mobile messenger during four weeks. (3 sessions/week) | 29 |
| Control Group The control group receives usual care with only one educational session.
Control (Education): Usual care with only one educational session. | 35 |
| Total | 64 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tele-rehabilitation Group | Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 29 Participants | 35 Participants | 64 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 71.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 | 72.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 | 71.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 |
| BMI | 24 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3 | 24 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 | 24 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Korea | 29 participants | 35 participants | 64 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants | 14 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants | 21 Participants | 36 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 29 | 0 / 35 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 29 | 0 / 35 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 29 | 0 / 35 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) also referred to as a VO2 (oxygen consumption) test, is a specialized type of stress test or exercise test that measures participants exercise ability.
Time frame: Before surgery (Pre), Baseline (4 weeks after surgery), After intervention(8 weeks after surgery), Follow up(12 weeks after surgery)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | Before surgery (Pre) | 23.67 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 4.64 |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | Baseline (4 weeks after surgery) | 19.28 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 4.16 |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | After intervention(8 weeks after surgery) | 21.85 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 4.22 |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | Follow up(12 weeks after surgery) | 21.73 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 4.18 |
| Control Group | Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | Follow up(12 weeks after surgery) | 19.82 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 3.89 |
| Control Group | Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | Before surgery (Pre) | 23.09 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 4.73 |
| Control Group | Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | After intervention(8 weeks after surgery) | 19.85 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 4.02 |
| Control Group | Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention | Baseline (4 weeks after surgery) | 20.41 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 3.62 |
EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group to measure health-related quality of life. It consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels: (1) no problems, (2) slight problems, (3) moderate problems, (4) severe problems, and (5) extreme problems. Responses are converted into a summary index score, which ranges from -0.281 to 1.000, based on country-specific value sets. Higher index scores indicate better health status, with 1.000 representing full health and values below 0 indicating health states considered worse than death. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 represents the best health imaginable and 0 represents the worst health imaginable. Higher VAS scores reflect
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index Score Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.05 score on a scale |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 4-Week Follow-Up | 0.05 score on a scale |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale Score Immediately After Rehabilitation | 6.4 score on a scale |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale Score at 4-Week Follow-Up | 7.9 score on a scale |
| Control Group | EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale Score at 4-Week Follow-Up | 7.7 score on a scale |
| Control Group | EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index Score Immediately After Rehabilitation | -0.03 score on a scale |
| Control Group | EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale Score Immediately After Rehabilitation | 5.4 score on a scale |
| Control Group | EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension) | Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 4-Week Follow-Up | 0.0 score on a scale |
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the maximum amount of air a participant can forcibly exhale from lungs after fully inhaling. The unit is expressed in liters.
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | Within-Group Differences in Forced Vital Capacity Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.17 Liter |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | Within-Group Differences in Forced Vital Capacity at 4-Week Follow-Up | 0.25 Liter |
| Control Group | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | Within-Group Differences in Forced Vital Capacity Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.18 Liter |
| Control Group | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | Within-Group Differences in Forced Vital Capacity at 4-Week Follow-Up | 0.23 Liter |
Grip Strength
Grip strength is a measure of muscular strength or the maximum force/tension generated by participant's forearm muscles using the Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. The force has been measured in kilograms.
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Grip Strength | Within-Group Differences in Grip Strength Immediately After Rehabilitation | -0.3 Kg |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Grip Strength | Within-Group Differences in Grip Strength at 4-Week Follow-Up | -0.7 Kg |
| Control Group | Grip Strength | Within-Group Differences in Grip Strength Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.1 Kg |
| Control Group | Grip Strength | Within-Group Differences in Grip Strength at 4-Week Follow-Up | -0.2 Kg |
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised 30 years ago by Zigmond and Snaith to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients. The HADS is a fourteen item scale that generates: Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case)
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Within-Group Differences in HADS Anxiety Score Immediately After Rehabilitation | -0.4 score on a scale |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Within-Group Differences in HADS Anxiety Score at 4-Week Follow-Up | -0.9 score on a scale |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Within-Group Differences in HADS Depression Score Immediately After Rehabilitation | -1.1 score on a scale |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Within-Group Differences in HADS Depression Score at 4-Week Follow-Up | -1.0 score on a scale |
| Control Group | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Within-Group Differences in HADS Depression Score at 4-Week Follow-Up | -1.2 score on a scale |
| Control Group | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Within-Group Differences in HADS Anxiety Score Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.6 score on a scale |
| Control Group | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Within-Group Differences in HADS Depression Score Immediately After Rehabilitation | -0.6 score on a scale |
| Control Group | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Within-Group Differences in HADS Anxiety Score at 4-Week Follow-Up | -0.1 score on a scale |
Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Maximal inspiratory pressure measured using a handheld respiratory device. Higher values indicate stronger inspiratory muscles. Unit of Measure: cmH₂O
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) | Within-Group Differences in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Immediately After Rehabilitation | 5.2 cm/H2O |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) | Within-Group Differences in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure at 4-Week Follow-Up | 7.9 cm/H2O |
| Control Group | Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) | Within-Group Differences in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Immediately After Rehabilitation | 8.3 cm/H2O |
| Control Group | Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) | Within-Group Differences in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure at 4-Week Follow-Up | 5.4 cm/H2O |
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
The peak expiratory flow (PEF) is a participant's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a participant's ability to breathe out air. It measures the airflow through the bronchi and thus the degree of obstruction in the airways. Peak expiratory flow is typically measured in units of liters per minute (L/min).
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Within-Group Differences in Peak Expiratory Flow Immediately After Rehabilitation | 14.2 L/min |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Within-Group Differences in Peak Expiratory Flow at 4-Week Follow-Up | 28.7 L/min |
| Control Group | Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Within-Group Differences in Peak Expiratory Flow Immediately After Rehabilitation | 27.4 L/min |
| Control Group | Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Within-Group Differences in Peak Expiratory Flow at 4-Week Follow-Up | 24.1 L/min |
Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)
Skeletal muscle index calculated by dividing appendicular skeletal muscle mass by height squared. Higher values indicate greater muscle mass. Unit of Measure: kg/m²
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) | Within-Group Differences in Skeletal Muscle Index Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.1 kg/m² |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) | Within-Group Differences in Skeletal Muscle Index at 4-Week Follow-Up | 0.1 kg/m² |
| Control Group | Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) | Within-Group Differences in Skeletal Muscle Index Immediately After Rehabilitation | -0.1 kg/m² |
| Control Group | Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) | Within-Group Differences in Skeletal Muscle Index at 4-Week Follow-Up | 0.11 kg/m² |
Steps
As a physical activity, Counting participant's steps per a day with an activity tracker. Average number of steps per day for one week before surgery and after discharge.
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Steps | Within-Group Differences in Daily Step Count Immediately After Rehabilitation | -45 steps/day |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Steps | Within-Group Differences in Daily Step Count at 4-Week Follow-Up | 1050 steps/day |
| Control Group | Steps | Within-Group Differences in Daily Step Count Immediately After Rehabilitation | -469 steps/day |
| Control Group | Steps | Within-Group Differences in Daily Step Count at 4-Week Follow-Up | 95 steps/day |
The Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the volume of air (in liters) exhaled in the first second during forced exhalation after maximal inspiration.
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | The Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) | Within-Group Differences in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.14 Liter |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | The Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) | Within-Group Differences in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second at 4-Week Follow-Up | 0.19 Liter |
| Control Group | The Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) | Within-Group Differences in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.11 Liter |
| Control Group | The Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) | Within-Group Differences in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second at 4-Week Follow-Up | 0.15 Liter |
Ventilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope)
VE/VCO₂ slope measured during CPET. Lower values indicate better ventilatory efficiency.
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Ventilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope) | Within-Group Differences in VE/VCO₂ Slope Immediately After Rehabilitation | 4.0 ratio |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Ventilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope) | Within-Group Differences in VE/VCO₂ Slope at 4-Week Follow-Up | -0.1 ratio |
| Control Group | Ventilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope) | Within-Group Differences in VE/VCO₂ Slope Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.6 ratio |
| Control Group | Ventilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope) | Within-Group Differences in VE/VCO₂ Slope at 4-Week Follow-Up | 1.4 ratio |
Whole-Body Phase Angle
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived phase angle (PA) is an alternative method to assess mortality risk. BIA is a simple, non-invasive technique that estimates body composition by measuring the opposition (impedance) to an applied current while passing through the body. Impedance consists of two components: resistance, which is the opposition to the flow of an alternating current through intra- and extracellular ionic solutions, and reactance, which is the delay in conduction as a result of capacitance by cell membranes and tissue interfaces. PA is regarded as a biological marker of cellular health, as it reflects cell mass, membrane integrity, and hydration status. PA has repeatedly proven to be a predictor of morbidity and mortality in various patient groups.
Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Whole-Body Phase Angle | Within-Group Differences in Whole-Body Phase Angle Immediately After Rehabilitation | 0.04 degrees |
| Tele-rehabilitation Group | Whole-Body Phase Angle | Within-Group Differences in Whole-Body Phase Angle at 4-Week Follow-Up | -0.02 degrees |
| Control Group | Whole-Body Phase Angle | Within-Group Differences in Whole-Body Phase Angle Immediately After Rehabilitation | -0.1 degrees |
| Control Group | Whole-Body Phase Angle | Within-Group Differences in Whole-Body Phase Angle at 4-Week Follow-Up | -0.12 degrees |