Skip to content

Postoperative Telerehabilitation in Older Adults

Comparison of Postoperative Telerehabilitation and Unsupervised Home-Based Training in Older Adults With Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05435885
Enrollment
64
Registered
2022-06-28
Start date
2022-07-25
Completion date
2024-02-16
Last updated
2025-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test, Telerehabilitation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to confirm the effectiveness of a mobile messenger-based home tele-rehabilitation protocol in patients who have undergone lung resection surgery. By analyzing the difference from the existing postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation, the investigators would like to propose a new pulmonary tele-rehabilitation protocol.

Interventions

12 supervised training sessions via a specific mobile messenger during four weeks. (3 sessions/week)

OTHERControl (Education)

Usual care with only one educational session.

Sponsors

National Research Foundation of Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Pusan National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. A person who is suspected of lung cancer and is scheduled to undergo a thoracoscopic lung resection surgery. 2. men and women the age ≥65 years. 3. A person who understands the course of the clinical trial and signs the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients whose activity is restricted due to other diseases (e.g. osteoarthritis, spinal disease, cerebral infarction, etc.) 2. Patients who cannot test bioimpedance analysis due to the insertion of artificial pacemakers and defibrillators 3. A person who has difficulty judging himself/herself due to dementia, etc 4. Those enrolled in other clinical trials 5. A person deemed inappropriate to participate in this clinical trial under the judgement of the investigator. 6. A person who cannot use mobile messenger

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionBefore surgery (Pre), Baseline (4 weeks after surgery), After intervention(8 weeks after surgery), Follow up(12 weeks after surgery)Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) also referred to as a VO2 (oxygen consumption) test, is a specialized type of stress test or exercise test that measures participants exercise ability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpMaximal inspiratory pressure measured using a handheld respiratory device. Higher values indicate stronger inspiratory muscles. Unit of Measure: cmH₂O
Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpSkeletal muscle index calculated by dividing appendicular skeletal muscle mass by height squared. Higher values indicate greater muscle mass. Unit of Measure: kg/m²
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpThe Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised 30 years ago by Zigmond and Snaith to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients. The HADS is a fourteen item scale that generates: Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case)
StepsImmediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpAs a physical activity, Counting participant's steps per a day with an activity tracker. Average number of steps per day for one week before surgery and after discharge.
EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpThe EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group to measure health-related quality of life. It consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels: (1) no problems, (2) slight problems, (3) moderate problems, (4) severe problems, and (5) extreme problems. Responses are converted into a summary index score, which ranges from -0.281 to 1.000, based on country-specific value sets. Higher index scores indicate better health status, with 1.000 representing full health and values below 0 indicating health states considered worse than death. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 represents the best health imaginable and 0 represents the worst health imaginable. Higher VAS scores reflect
Ventilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope)Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpVE/VCO₂ slope measured during CPET. Lower values indicate better ventilatory efficiency.
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpThe peak expiratory flow (PEF) is a participant's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a participant's ability to breathe out air. It measures the airflow through the bronchi and thus the degree of obstruction in the airways. Peak expiratory flow is typically measured in units of liters per minute (L/min).
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpForced vital capacity (FVC) is the maximum amount of air a participant can forcibly exhale from lungs after fully inhaling. The unit is expressed in liters.
The Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpThe forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the volume of air (in liters) exhaled in the first second during forced exhalation after maximal inspiration.
Whole-Body Phase AngleImmediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived phase angle (PA) is an alternative method to assess mortality risk. BIA is a simple, non-invasive technique that estimates body composition by measuring the opposition (impedance) to an applied current while passing through the body. Impedance consists of two components: resistance, which is the opposition to the flow of an alternating current through intra- and extracellular ionic solutions, and reactance, which is the delay in conduction as a result of capacitance by cell membranes and tissue interfaces. PA is regarded as a biological marker of cellular health, as it reflects cell mass, membrane integrity, and hydration status. PA has repeatedly proven to be a predictor of morbidity and mortality in various patient groups.
Grip StrengthImmediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-UpGrip strength is a measure of muscular strength or the maximum force/tension generated by participant's forearm muscles using the Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. The force has been measured in kilograms.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 96 participants were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 64 were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tele-rehabilitation Group
The Tele-rehabilitation group performs 12 training sessions during four weeks. (3 sessions/week) Pulmonary Tele-Rehabilitation: 12 supervised training sessions via a specific mobile messenger during four weeks. (3 sessions/week)
29
Control Group
The control group receives usual care with only one educational session. Control (Education): Usual care with only one educational session.
35
Total64

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTele-rehabilitation GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
29 Participants35 Participants64 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous71.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
72.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
71.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
BMI24 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
24 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
24 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
29 participants35 participants64 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants21 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks Intervention

Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) also referred to as a VO2 (oxygen consumption) test, is a specialized type of stress test or exercise test that measures participants exercise ability.

Time frame: Before surgery (Pre), Baseline (4 weeks after surgery), After intervention(8 weeks after surgery), Follow up(12 weeks after surgery)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-rehabilitation GroupChange From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionBefore surgery (Pre)23.67 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.64
Tele-rehabilitation GroupChange From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionBaseline (4 weeks after surgery)19.28 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.16
Tele-rehabilitation GroupChange From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionAfter intervention(8 weeks after surgery)21.85 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.22
Tele-rehabilitation GroupChange From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionFollow up(12 weeks after surgery)21.73 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.18
Control GroupChange From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionFollow up(12 weeks after surgery)19.82 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.89
Control GroupChange From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionBefore surgery (Pre)23.09 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.73
Control GroupChange From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionAfter intervention(8 weeks after surgery)19.85 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.02
Control GroupChange From Baseline in VO2 Peak (Peak Oxygen Uptake, mL/kg/Min) on the CardioPulmonary Exercise Test(CPET) After 4 Weeks InterventionBaseline (4 weeks after surgery)20.41 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.62
Secondary

EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group to measure health-related quality of life. It consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels: (1) no problems, (2) slight problems, (3) moderate problems, (4) severe problems, and (5) extreme problems. Responses are converted into a summary index score, which ranges from -0.281 to 1.000, based on country-specific value sets. Higher index scores indicate better health status, with 1.000 representing full health and values below 0 indicating health states considered worse than death. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 represents the best health imaginable and 0 represents the worst health imaginable. Higher VAS scores reflect

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupEQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index Score Immediately After Rehabilitation0.05 score on a scale
Tele-rehabilitation GroupEQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 4-Week Follow-Up0.05 score on a scale
Tele-rehabilitation GroupEQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale Score Immediately After Rehabilitation6.4 score on a scale
Tele-rehabilitation GroupEQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale Score at 4-Week Follow-Up7.9 score on a scale
Control GroupEQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale Score at 4-Week Follow-Up7.7 score on a scale
Control GroupEQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index Score Immediately After Rehabilitation-0.03 score on a scale
Control GroupEQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale Score Immediately After Rehabilitation5.4 score on a scale
Control GroupEQ-5D (EuroQol-5 Dimension)Within-Group Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 4-Week Follow-Up0.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the maximum amount of air a participant can forcibly exhale from lungs after fully inhaling. The unit is expressed in liters.

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupForced Vital Capacity (FVC)Within-Group Differences in Forced Vital Capacity Immediately After Rehabilitation0.17 Liter
Tele-rehabilitation GroupForced Vital Capacity (FVC)Within-Group Differences in Forced Vital Capacity at 4-Week Follow-Up0.25 Liter
Control GroupForced Vital Capacity (FVC)Within-Group Differences in Forced Vital Capacity Immediately After Rehabilitation0.18 Liter
Control GroupForced Vital Capacity (FVC)Within-Group Differences in Forced Vital Capacity at 4-Week Follow-Up0.23 Liter
Secondary

Grip Strength

Grip strength is a measure of muscular strength or the maximum force/tension generated by participant's forearm muscles using the Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer. The force has been measured in kilograms.

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupGrip StrengthWithin-Group Differences in Grip Strength Immediately After Rehabilitation-0.3 Kg
Tele-rehabilitation GroupGrip StrengthWithin-Group Differences in Grip Strength at 4-Week Follow-Up-0.7 Kg
Control GroupGrip StrengthWithin-Group Differences in Grip Strength Immediately After Rehabilitation0.1 Kg
Control GroupGrip StrengthWithin-Group Differences in Grip Strength at 4-Week Follow-Up-0.2 Kg
Secondary

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised 30 years ago by Zigmond and Snaith to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients. The HADS is a fourteen item scale that generates: Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case)

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Within-Group Differences in HADS Anxiety Score Immediately After Rehabilitation-0.4 score on a scale
Tele-rehabilitation GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Within-Group Differences in HADS Anxiety Score at 4-Week Follow-Up-0.9 score on a scale
Tele-rehabilitation GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Within-Group Differences in HADS Depression Score Immediately After Rehabilitation-1.1 score on a scale
Tele-rehabilitation GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Within-Group Differences in HADS Depression Score at 4-Week Follow-Up-1.0 score on a scale
Control GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Within-Group Differences in HADS Depression Score at 4-Week Follow-Up-1.2 score on a scale
Control GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Within-Group Differences in HADS Anxiety Score Immediately After Rehabilitation0.6 score on a scale
Control GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Within-Group Differences in HADS Depression Score Immediately After Rehabilitation-0.6 score on a scale
Control GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Within-Group Differences in HADS Anxiety Score at 4-Week Follow-Up-0.1 score on a scale
Secondary

Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)

Maximal inspiratory pressure measured using a handheld respiratory device. Higher values indicate stronger inspiratory muscles. Unit of Measure: cmH₂O

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupMaximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)Within-Group Differences in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Immediately After Rehabilitation5.2 cm/H2O
Tele-rehabilitation GroupMaximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)Within-Group Differences in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure at 4-Week Follow-Up7.9 cm/H2O
Control GroupMaximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)Within-Group Differences in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Immediately After Rehabilitation8.3 cm/H2O
Control GroupMaximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)Within-Group Differences in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure at 4-Week Follow-Up5.4 cm/H2O
Secondary

Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)

The peak expiratory flow (PEF) is a participant's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a participant's ability to breathe out air. It measures the airflow through the bronchi and thus the degree of obstruction in the airways. Peak expiratory flow is typically measured in units of liters per minute (L/min).

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupPeak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Within-Group Differences in Peak Expiratory Flow Immediately After Rehabilitation14.2 L/min
Tele-rehabilitation GroupPeak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Within-Group Differences in Peak Expiratory Flow at 4-Week Follow-Up28.7 L/min
Control GroupPeak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Within-Group Differences in Peak Expiratory Flow Immediately After Rehabilitation27.4 L/min
Control GroupPeak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Within-Group Differences in Peak Expiratory Flow at 4-Week Follow-Up24.1 L/min
Secondary

Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI)

Skeletal muscle index calculated by dividing appendicular skeletal muscle mass by height squared. Higher values indicate greater muscle mass. Unit of Measure: kg/m²

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupSkeletal Muscle Index (SMI)Within-Group Differences in Skeletal Muscle Index Immediately After Rehabilitation0.1 kg/m²
Tele-rehabilitation GroupSkeletal Muscle Index (SMI)Within-Group Differences in Skeletal Muscle Index at 4-Week Follow-Up0.1 kg/m²
Control GroupSkeletal Muscle Index (SMI)Within-Group Differences in Skeletal Muscle Index Immediately After Rehabilitation-0.1 kg/m²
Control GroupSkeletal Muscle Index (SMI)Within-Group Differences in Skeletal Muscle Index at 4-Week Follow-Up0.11 kg/m²
Secondary

Steps

As a physical activity, Counting participant's steps per a day with an activity tracker. Average number of steps per day for one week before surgery and after discharge.

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupStepsWithin-Group Differences in Daily Step Count Immediately After Rehabilitation-45 steps/day
Tele-rehabilitation GroupStepsWithin-Group Differences in Daily Step Count at 4-Week Follow-Up1050 steps/day
Control GroupStepsWithin-Group Differences in Daily Step Count Immediately After Rehabilitation-469 steps/day
Control GroupStepsWithin-Group Differences in Daily Step Count at 4-Week Follow-Up95 steps/day
Secondary

The Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the volume of air (in liters) exhaled in the first second during forced exhalation after maximal inspiration.

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupThe Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)Within-Group Differences in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Immediately After Rehabilitation0.14 Liter
Tele-rehabilitation GroupThe Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)Within-Group Differences in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second at 4-Week Follow-Up0.19 Liter
Control GroupThe Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)Within-Group Differences in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Immediately After Rehabilitation0.11 Liter
Control GroupThe Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)Within-Group Differences in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second at 4-Week Follow-Up0.15 Liter
Secondary

Ventilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope)

VE/VCO₂ slope measured during CPET. Lower values indicate better ventilatory efficiency.

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupVentilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope)Within-Group Differences in VE/VCO₂ Slope Immediately After Rehabilitation4.0 ratio
Tele-rehabilitation GroupVentilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope)Within-Group Differences in VE/VCO₂ Slope at 4-Week Follow-Up-0.1 ratio
Control GroupVentilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope)Within-Group Differences in VE/VCO₂ Slope Immediately After Rehabilitation0.6 ratio
Control GroupVentilatory Efficiency (VE/VCO₂ Slope)Within-Group Differences in VE/VCO₂ Slope at 4-Week Follow-Up1.4 ratio
Secondary

Whole-Body Phase Angle

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived phase angle (PA) is an alternative method to assess mortality risk. BIA is a simple, non-invasive technique that estimates body composition by measuring the opposition (impedance) to an applied current while passing through the body. Impedance consists of two components: resistance, which is the opposition to the flow of an alternating current through intra- and extracellular ionic solutions, and reactance, which is the delay in conduction as a result of capacitance by cell membranes and tissue interfaces. PA is regarded as a biological marker of cellular health, as it reflects cell mass, membrane integrity, and hydration status. PA has repeatedly proven to be a predictor of morbidity and mortality in various patient groups.

Time frame: Immediately After Rehabilitation and at 4-Week Follow-Up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tele-rehabilitation GroupWhole-Body Phase AngleWithin-Group Differences in Whole-Body Phase Angle Immediately After Rehabilitation0.04 degrees
Tele-rehabilitation GroupWhole-Body Phase AngleWithin-Group Differences in Whole-Body Phase Angle at 4-Week Follow-Up-0.02 degrees
Control GroupWhole-Body Phase AngleWithin-Group Differences in Whole-Body Phase Angle Immediately After Rehabilitation-0.1 degrees
Control GroupWhole-Body Phase AngleWithin-Group Differences in Whole-Body Phase Angle at 4-Week Follow-Up-0.12 degrees

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026