Proprioceptive Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligaments rupture, proprioceptive knee brace, rehabilitation
Brief summary
The objective of the study is to compare, with or without wearing an elastic proprioceptive knee brace, the functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee in patients suffering from proprioceptive deficit.
Detailed description
This proprioceptive deficit is found following various traumas or injuries such as Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture, for example. The use of joint stabilizers (such as knee braces) will allow an increase in sensory input (particularly at the level of cutaneous mechanoreceptors), and improve the biomechanics of the injured joint. The objective of the study is to compare, with or without wearing an elastic proprioceptive knee brace, the functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee in patients suffering from proprioceptive deficit.
Interventions
the patient will perform the tests with the knee brace
DEVICENo knee brace
the patient will perform the tests without the knee brace
Sponsors
Thuasne
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Masking description
the clinical trial is carried out in open label
Intervention model description
This is a prospective, single-center, interventional, open-label, 1-day clinical investigation in a population of patients with proprioceptive knee deficiency. A randomization will be performed in order to know the order of passage of the 2 conditions: with and without wearing a knee brace.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient with a proprioception deficit of the knee: detection threshold higher than 2.5° on the TTDPM (Threshold to detect passive motion) test * Patient whose knee measurements are compatible with the sizes of the proprioceptive knee brace * Patient having signed a free and informed consent form * Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security plan
Exclusion criteria
* Patient with knee pain on walking greater than or equal to 4 out of 10 on a VAS scale. * Patient in the early phase of acute trauma to the lower limb * Patient having worn a knee brace in the 48 hours prior to inclusion * Pregnant women * Patient presenting one of the contraindications to the use of the knee brace, indicated in the instructions for use * Patient with a major cognitive impairment incompatible with participation in a clinical trial * Patient participating in another clinical investigation conducted to establish the conformity of a DM (Medical Device) impacting the judgment criteria * Vulnerable patient according to article L1121-6 of the public health code, person subject to a judicial protection measure or unable to consent freely
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of the functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee in patients with proprioceptive deficit with or without wearing an elastic proprioceptive knee brace. | Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2) | The functional proprioceptive capacity of the knee is measured via the 3-axis composite score of the Y Balance Test (YBT). This score corresponds to the average of the 3 maximum distances obtained during the YBT test, normalized by leg length. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the sensitivity to the position of a joint with or without wearing the knee brace | Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2) | Sensitivity to the position of a joint by determining the perception of the position of the leg in space via the JPS (Joint Position Sense) test. |
| Evaluation of the static stability when using or not the knee brace. | Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2) | Static stability level is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no stability (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum stability (better outcome). |
| Evaluation of the stability when walking when using or not the knee brace. | Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2) | Stability level when walking is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no stability (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum stability (better outcome). |
| Evaluation of the discomfort level when using or not the knee brace. | Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2) | Discomfort level when walking is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no discomfort (better outcome) and 10 to maximum discomfort (worst outcome). |
| Evaluation of tactile sensitivity (baresthesia) with or without wearing the knee brace | Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2) | Tactile sensitivity (Baresthesia) via the use of Weinstein monofilaments. |
| Evaluation of the range of motion ok the knee level when using or not the knee brace. | Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2) | Range of motion of the knee level is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no range of motion (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum range of motion (better outcome). |
| Evaluation of patient satisfaction with the use of the knee brace with a specific questionnaire | Day 1 | Patient satisfaction with the use of the knee brace via a specific questionnaire composed of 15 questions. |
| Evaluation of the patient's tolerance to the use of the knee brace. | Day 1 | Evaluation of the patient's tolerance to the use of the knee brace through the collection of adverse events. |
| Evaluation of the fluidity level when using or not the knee brace. | Day 1 (2 times, after condition 1 and after condition 2) | Fluidity level is measured by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) completed by the patient : 0 corresponds to no fluidity (worst outcome) and 10 to maximum fluidity (better outcome). |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed