Skip to content

Surgical Ablation of AF Efficacy Trial

Surgical Ablation of AF Efficacy Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05434819
Acronym
SAFE
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2022-06-28
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure

Keywords

Surgical Ablation, Cardiac Surgery

Brief summary

SAFE is an international multicentre RCT of concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing cardiac surgery.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects more than 1% of the general population and is an important risk factor for stroke. AF prevalence increases with age, occurring in 10 to 15% of patients older than 80 years of age, which is important with the aging population. Of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 10.8% have a history of AF. AF is believed to cause the left atrium to dilate and lose its transport function. AF significantly increases the risk of ischemic stroke of cardioembolic origin, but is also associated with heart failure and impairs quality of life. Although the causal relationship between the 2 clinical entities has not been fully elucidated, AF is believed to cause heart failure via several mechanisms. Ablation of AF is the application of scars to the atrial tissue to disrupt faulty electrical signals that cause the arrhythmia. If surgical ablation of AF yields a benefit similar to catheter-based AF ablation, thousands of people undergoing cardiac surgery could benefit from this procedure each year. SAFE will be a landmark trial in cardiac surgery, definitely establishing surgical AF ablation's impact on cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiac surgery is the optimal setting to establish whether maintenance of sinus rhythm through AF ablation yields clinical benefit, and is a setting where sham-control is possible. This will not only provide evidence for the cardiac surgical patients but will bolster the evidence for ablation (catheter or stand-alone surgical) in other AF patients. The intervention under investigation is concomitant surgical AF ablation which is compared to no surgical AF ablation. The primary outcome is hospital readmissions with heart failure during 4 years of follow-up. This study will enroll 2000 patients from 50 centres, globally. Patients will be followed at hospital discharge, 4 to 6 weeks after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and then at 6-month intervals until the final follow-up visit, for a median follow-up for 4 years.

Interventions

PROCEDURESurgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Surgeon will preform surgical atrial fibrillation ablation using either cryoablation or bipolar radiofrequency clamps including 2 layers of atrium or vein, a minimum of 2 burns per clamping with at least 3 lines in the ablation group. Cavo-tricuspid isthmus and mitral lines will be allowed.

Sponsors

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
CollaboratorOTHER
Population Health Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blinding to allocation will be maintained for all parties, excluding the operating surgeon and necessary operating room personnel.

Intervention model description

Each patient will be assigned in a blinded fashion to one of two groups (atrial fibrillation ablation or no atrial fibrillation ablation) in a 1:1 ratio.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years; * Undergoing a clinically indicated cardiac surgical procedure: CABG, AVR, ascending aorta replacement, or combinations thereof; * Documented history of paroxysmal or persistent AF * Provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Dominant atrial arrhythmia is atrial flutter; * Documented left atrial diameter ≥ 6 cm; * Previous cardiac surgery requiring opening of the pericardium; * Patients undergoing any of the following procedures: 1. Heart transplant 2. Complex congenital heart surgery 3. Sole indication for surgery is ventricular assist device insertion 4. Mitral valve repair or replacement 5. Tricuspid valve repair or replacement * Patient resides in a long-term care facility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of hospital readmissions for heart failure over duration of follow-upCommon termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Total number of hospital readmissions for heart failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of ICU stayFrom the date of study intervention surgery completion to the date of index hospital discharge, assessed up to the common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Length of ICU stay, including readmissions, from study intervention surgery to hospital discharge, including readmissions
Length of hospital stayFrom the date of study intervention surgery completion to the date of index hospital discharge, assessed up to the common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Length of hospital stay
Freedom from recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia1 year post-operativelyFreedom from recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia
Number of days free from admission to healthcare facility or presentation to the emergency department for heart failureCommon termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Number of days free admission to healthcare facility or presentation to the emergency department for heart failure
All-cause mortalityCommon termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)All-cause mortality
Cardiovascular mortalityCommon termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Cardiovascular mortality
Antiarrhythmic drug useBeyond 6 weeks until common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Antiarrhythmic drug use
Number of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation90 days post- study surgery until common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Number of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation
Quality of Life - atrial fibrillation specificAt 1 year, and at common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Atrial fibrillation specific quality of life as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy of Life questionnaire (AFEQT) which is 20 questions using a 7 point Likert scale where a higher score means a worse outcome.
Quality of Life - heart failure specificAt 1 year, and at common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Heart failure specific quality of life assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) which is a 12 questions using Likert scales where a higher score is a better outcome.
Quality of Life - GeneralAt 1 year, and at common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Quality of life- general as assessed by the European quality of life index version 5D (EQ-5D-5L) which consists of a descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement.
Number of Ischemic stroke or systemic arterial embolism events over duration of follow upCommon termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Number of Ischemic stroke or systemic arterial embolism events over duration of follow up

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volume of chest tube outputUp to 24 hours post-operativelySafety outcome - chest tube output measured in mL.
Re-operation for bleedingFrom date of study intervention surgery completion to date of index hospital discharge, assessed up to the common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Safety outcome
All-cause mortalityPrior to discharge or within 30 days post-operatively (whichever occurs first)Safety outcome
Post-operative major bleeding<48 hours after surgerySafety outcome
Number of patients with pulmonary vein stenosisAt 1 year, and at common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Safety outcome
Number of patients with stiff left atrium syndromeAt 1 year, and at common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Safety outcome
Number of patients with esophageal to atrial fistulaAt 1 year, and at common termination point for trial (median follow-up of 4 years)Safety outcome
Health economic analysis of surgical atrial fibrillationAt 1 year, and at common termination point (median follow-up of 4 years)Economic analysis will be assessed via health care utilization by patients
Number of patients requiring permanent pacemaker implantationUp to 1 year post-operativelySafety outcome
Number of Ischemic stroke and systemic arterial embolismUp to 30 days post-operativelySafety outcome

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactRichard Whitlock
Richard.Whitlock@phri.ca905-521-2100
Backup ContactSAFE Coordinators
SAFE@phri.ca

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026