Skip to content

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Spasticity in People With Spinal Cord Injury

Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Spasticity in Chronic SCI: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05432999
Enrollment
5
Registered
2022-06-27
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paraplegia, Spasticity, Muscle, Spastic Paraplegia, Spastic Quadriplegia, Spastic Tetraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia

Keywords

shockwave, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, spinal cord injury, spasticity

Brief summary

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience a host of secondary complications that can impact their quality of life and functional independence. One of the more prevalent complications is spasticity, which occurs in response to spinal cord damage and the resulting disruption of motor pathways. Common symptoms include spasms and stiffness, and can occur more than once per hour in many people with SCI. Spasticity can have a negative impact over many quality of life domains, including loss of functional independence, activity limitations, and even employment. Its impact on health domains is also pronounced, with many people who have spasticity reporting mood disorders, depression, pain, sleep disturbances, and contractures. Spasticity can interfere with post-injury rehabilitation and lead to hospitalization. There are many treatments for spasticity in this population. However, many do not have long-term efficacy, and, if they do, they are often pharmacological in nature and carry side effects that could limit function or affect health. The goal of this pilot, randomized-controlled study is to investigate the potential efficacy and safety of a non-invasive treatment with a low side effect profile, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT). ESWT has shown some benefits in people with post-stroke spasticity with no long term side effects. Thirty individuals with chronic, traumatic SCI will be recruited. Fifteen will be provided with ESWT while the other fifteen will be given a sham treatment. Clinical and self-report measures of spasticity and its impact on quality of life will be collected, as well as quantitative ultrasound measures of muscle architecture and stiffness. The ultimate goal of this pilot project is to collect the data necessary to apply for a larger randomized-controlled trial. Conducting a larger trial will allow for a more powerful estimation of safety and efficacy of ESWT as a treatment for spasticity in people with SCI.

Interventions

DEVICEExtracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Shockwaves are high pressure sound waves that interact with tissues to elicit a biological response. The shockwave probe will be placed on the skin with ultrasound gel and the muscle will be stimulated for a few minutes.

Sponsors

Kessler Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized, controlled trial with sham control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 years of age or older. 2. Have a non-progressive traumatic SCI (complete or incomplete) with residual neurological deficits that occurred greater than 1 year prior to their enrollment. 3. MAS score of 2 or greater in the gastrocnemius of the treated limb. 4. Can be treated with shockwaves. Contraindications include current or recent (within the past 3 months) infection at the site of treatment and severe coagulopathies (e.g. hemophilia).164 5. No change in antispasmodic medications within the past three months or intended changes over the course of the trial. 6. Participant is able and willing to comply with the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of surgical procedures of the lower extremity. 2. Ankle contracture. 3. Sever, inflammatory arthritic diseases. 4. Thrombosis. 5. Anticoagulant medications. 6. Pregnancy. 7. Cancer. 8. Recent history of local injection of botulinum toxin within 6 months, or phenol/alcohol with 12 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale scores4 weeksThe Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a physical exam maneuver used frequently both clinically and for research purposes to assess the increase in velocity-dependent muscle tone after neurologic disorders. We will be focusing on the MAS score of the ankle plantar flexors. This measure is included in the NINDS list of CDE recommendations for SCI. Specifically, it evaluates the resistance to passive stretch of the ankle joint through full range of motion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale scores8 weeksThe Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a physical exam maneuver used frequently both clinically and for research purposes to assess the increase in velocity-dependent muscle tone after neurologic disorders. We will be focusing on the MAS score of the ankle plantar flexors. This measure is included in the NINDS list of CDE recommendations for SCI. Specifically, it evaluates the resistance to passive stretch of the ankle joint through full range of motion.
Change in Modified Tardieu Scale4 weeksThe Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) was developed as a more accurate method to measure spasticity by assessing muscle tone at different velocities. Since its development, it has gone through multiple modifications. The MTS is also included in the NINDS CDE recommendations as a measure of spasticity in people with SCI. The MTS includes two measurements, quality and angle of muscle reaction.
Change in Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale4 weeksThe Modified Penn Spasticity Frequency Scale (mPSFS) is a self-report scale with two components, which is meant to provide a more complete understanding of an individual's spasticity status. The first component is comprised of a five-point scale, which assesses spasm frequency between 0 ("no spasms") and 4 ("spontaneous spasms occurring more than 10 times per hour"). The second component includes a three-point scale, which assesses spasm severity between 1 ("mild") and 3 ("severe"); this component is not answered if the individual reports no spasms in part one.
Change in Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure4 weeksThe Modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (mPRISM) is a self-reported instrument with 37 items that assesses the impact of spasticity on health-related quality of life. It is separated into physical, psychological, and social subdomains, making is possible to investigate how spasticity impacts different aspects of quality of life. Each item is rated using a scale of 0 ("never") to 3 ("often to very often").
Participant Global Impression of Change4 weeksThe Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC, also referred to as the original Guy-Farrar/PGIC scale) is used to measure global treatment effect. It asks the participant to rate, using a 7-point scale (anchored by "very much worse" and "very much improved"), his or her overall impression following treatment as compared to before the treatment. This scale is particularly useful as it provides an indication of clinically important improvement. Although it was designed for and has commonly been used in pain trials, it has been used to assess efficacy of spasticity treatments in people with SCI.
Medial gastrocnemius muscle echogenicity4 weeksAverage "brightness" of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured using quantitative ultrasound techniques.
Medial gastrocnemius muscle elasticity4 weeksAverage elasticity of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured using shear wave elastography.
Medial gastrocnemius muscle fiber length4 weeksFiber length of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.
Medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness4 weeksThickness of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.
Medial gastrocnemius muscle pennation angle4 weeksPennation angle of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, measured quantitatively using ultrasound.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026