Group Visits for High Risk Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Group Visits to Improve Technology Use, Glycemic Control, and Quality of Life in High Risk Children With Type 1 Diabetes

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05431686

Enrollment

Registered

2022-06-24

Start date

2022-02-16

Completion date

2025-07-01

Last updated

2025-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Brief summary

The investigators propose to conduct a pilot prospective cohort study to assess the impact of shared medical appointments (SMA) visits in underserved youth with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D). The trial will employ an enrollment visit, SMA visits every 3 months over a 12 month study period, followed by a 6-month observational period to assess feasibility and acceptability of SMA and the impact on glycemic control, self-management skills, and health related quality of life.

Detailed description

Dyads of youth with T1D aged 8-12 years and their primary diabetes caretakers identifying as non-Hispanic Black or Latinx will be recruited to participate in a pilot prospective cohort study exploring feasibility and acceptability of SMA and the impact on glycemic control, self-management skills, and health related quality of life. This trial will employ an enrollment visit, SMA visits every 3 months over a 12-month study period, and a follow-up 6-month observational period to continue to evaluate outcomes once patients return to routine individual follow up care. The study will include the intervention group participating in the SMA visits (n=20). All staff participating in the SMA visit will receive comprehensive training on how to facilitate the SMA discussion sessions effectively. All topics that will be covered at each SMA visit will be reviewed by the study staff ahead of the visit. Potential participants will be screened for participation using our electronic medical records system and will be approached during routine clinical visits. After explaining all study procedures, informed consent using an IRB-approved consent form will be obtained for all participants. After obtaining consent, a blinded Dexcom G6 CGM will be placed on the participant. Participants will be instructed to wear the blinded CGM for 10 days in order to obtain baseline glycemic control data prior to starting the SMA visit intervention. At the completion of the 10 day wear period, participants will mail back the blinded CGM in a pre-addressed envelope so that the data can be assessed within 30 days of the wear time. Because SMA visits will be used in place of routine clinic visits and because participants will not require any additional in person study visits, the investigators anticipate significant interest in participation with minimal barriers. Secure REDCap surveys will be sent to participants via email 1 week before each follow-up visit. If the surveys have not been completed at the time of the visit the participant will be asked to complete the measures using an iPad or paper in clinic at the time of their visit. Youth who elected not to use a CGM for routine clinical care, will be asked to wear a blinded professional CGM for 10 days prior to each visit whenever possible. SMA Structure: SMAs will consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver. All youth and caretakers will complete standard check-in procedures with the clinic medical staff, including routine clinical intake questionnaires, vital sign assessments and point-of-care fingerstick A1c measurements. Before each session, dyads will be invited to submit questions to the research team that will then be anonymously reviewed and discussed among the group during the SMA. In the event that no questions are submitted by families, the facilitator will begin the discussion with stories and questions related to technology use and potential barriers in order to focus the discussion on the aspect of diabetes management being highlighted in that specific SMA. After discussing the questions, the facilitator will lead a group discussion focusing on the topic of the day. During each visit, the facilitator role will be shared by a pediatric endocrinologist, CDCES, nutritionist, and psychologist. Youth and caregivers will individually meet with the endocrinologist at different time points during the session to update personal management plans and goals of care. The group visit will conclude with a review of the core concepts discussed. Youth will be encouraged to set and share individual goals to be addressed before the next SMA. Enrollment visit: This visit will occur at a routine clinic visit once a patient expresses interest in participating in the study. Alternatively, patients expressing interest in enrolling who are unable to do so at a routine clinic visit will have the option to come back for enrollment at a different time. A study team member will meet with the patient and family to review the study details and obtain consent. A blinded Dexcom G6 pro CGM will be placed on the patient and be worn for 10 days in order to collect baseline data prior to starting the intervention. Phone applications that will allow for sharing of CGM data between patients and the diabetes clinical care team will be downloaded and established before the end of the visit. Initial SMA: The structure of the group visits will be reviewed with patients and families, and all members of the diabetes team will introduce themselves and explain their role in diabetes care. As some patients will be CGM naïve before this visit, education will focus on insertion and removal of the CGM along with appropriate use of the CGM receiver, alerts and alarms, data sharing, and troubleshooting common CGM problems. Established sharing of CGM data between patients and the diabetes clinical care team will be confirmed before the end of the visit. The group visit will conclude with a review of the core concepts discussed, and patients will set goals for the next SMA. Follow Up SMA: Follow up SMA will be scheduled 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from the initial group visit. CGM data from 14 days prior to each SMA will be reviewed by the endocrinologist ahead of the group visit. Discussions and education guided by the facilitators will focus on issues that have been described in the literature as potential barriers to CGM use and adherence. Recurrent alerts and alarms can result in alarm fatigue, and falsely low glucose readings and sensor or transmitter failures have been cited as reasons for discontinuing CGM use. The continuous nature of CGM data has been shown to place significant demands on patients and their families, and to create stress related to the constant need for diabetes-related attention. Follow up visits will focus on optimized use of CGM alarms and prevention of alarm fatigue. Psychologists and CDCES will discuss strategies to cope with the on-body presence and potential embarrassment resulting from CGM wear and to optimize parent-child communication surrounding CGM. Nutritionists will highlight the impact of different foods on glycemic trends and discuss strategies to optimize control. SMA will also allow ample opportunity to jointly review de-identified CGM reports and how to effectively interpret data and make management changes in response to CGM data, empowering patients and families to improve self-management and reduce stress related to CGM use. Active participation in discussions and group exercises will continue to strengthen the community feeling and social support network within the SMA group. Any participant that chooses to discontinue CGM during the 12 month study period will wear a blinded CGM 10 days prior to the follow up visits to allow for complete data collection. Upon completion of the final SMA visit at month 12, dyads will be contacted to schedule a semi-structured interview and will then return to standard clinical care. 3-Month and 6-Month Post-Intervention Follow-Ups: Survey measures and assessments of glycemic control will be repeated after 3 months and 6 months of routine clinical care to assess for long-lasting effects of the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSMA visits

SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period

Study design

Allocation

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Masking

NONE

Intervention model description

The study will include the intervention group participating in the SMA visits (n=20)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

8 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Patients clinically diagnosed with T1D managed with insulin injections for at least 1 year * Non-Hispanic Black or Latinx ethnicity * Public healthcare insurance * Male or female ages ≥ 8 and \< 12 years * Poorly controlled T1D: one A1c value \> 8% in the preceding year * Fluent in English as the Dexcom technology is currently available only in English * Participation of the primary diabetes caregiver

Exclusion criteria

* Use of insulin pump therapy for diabetes management at time of enrollment * Major illnesses other than T1D * Significant cognitive limitations and major psychiatric disorders in the child or * Concurrent use of any non-insulin diabetes medication to control blood glucose levels. * Concurrent participation in any other clinical studies during study period

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Percentage of Eligible Participants Who Agreed to Participate as Assessed by Tracking Those Who Were Approached to Participate and Those Who Agreed to Participate	12 months	Investigators will track all patients who screened eligible to participate in the study, as well as those who that were contacted to gauge interest in participating. Investigators will track the percent of people who agreed to participate from those that were approached, with the goal of \>60% of those reached/eligible to participate agreeing to enroll as a measure of feasibility.
Percentage of Participants With CGM Use, as Assessed by Tracking CGM Use Status From Enrollment to the End of the Study.	18 months	For those who agree to enroll, investigators will classify participant's CGM use status at time of enrollment as either current CGM users, never CGM users, or those with CGM attrition. At the completion of the study, CGM use status will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% current CGM users among study participants as a measure of feasibility.
Frequency of SMA Sessions Attended, as Assessed by Tracking Study Visit Attendance.	12 months	For those who agree to enroll, investigators will document if participants attended or were absent from scheduled study visits. At the completion of the study, attendance will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% sessions attended among study participants as a measure of feasibility.
Perceived Satisfaction of SMA Intervention as Assessed by Semi-structured Interviews.	12 months	Thematic analysis of qualitative data will be conducted by two team members who independently review interview transcripts to generate initial codes. Initial codes will be discussed by the group to generate a list of second-cycle codes and each team member will then apply coding framework to all transcripts before identifying dominant themes. ATLAS.ti software will be used to organize and analyze qualitative data.
Perceived Utility of the SMA Intervention Content, as Measured by User Satisfaction Surveys Summary Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation as Well as Percent Answering a Specific Likert Level)	12 months	Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention utility. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived utility as a measure of acceptability.
Perceived Benefit of the SMA Intervention Content, as Measured by User Satisfaction Surveys Summary Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation as Well as Percent Answering a Specific Likert Level)	12 months	Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention benefit. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived benefit as a measure of acceptability.

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in the coefficient of variation values within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in number of episodes of severe hypoglycemia since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Number of Emergency Room Visits	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in number of episodes of emergency room visits since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Number of Hospital Admissions	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in number of hospital admissions since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Hemoglobin A1c	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in HbA1c at study visits within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in percent CGM wear time within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	The DSMP is a validated survey assessing T1D adherence. Scores range from 0 to 90, with higher scores reflecting better T1D management. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	The SED is a validated survey assessing diabetes-specific self-efficacy. Scores range from 0-4 for each question, with higher scores indicating increasing levels of child responsibility. The total scores can range from 0-100. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale is widely used for measuring diabetes-related emotional distress. Scores range from 0-5 for each question, with higher scores indicating greater burden relating to having diabetes. The total scores can range from 0-80. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	The CGM Benefits and Burdens scale is widely used for measuring perceptions of CGM benefit and burdens. Raw scores range from 1-5 for each question, with higher scores reflecting greater burdens/benefits. Total scores are scaled and combined, ranging from 0-200. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	The T1DAL is a validated survey assessing diabetes specific quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater quality of life. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in number of episodes of DKA since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are in range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are below range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are above range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose	baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months	We will look at differences in the mean sensor glucose values within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

all participants are assigned to a single SMA visit intervention arm

Participants by arm

Arm	Count
SMA Visit Intervention Arm SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver. Baseline characteristic data was collected for youth, not from caregivers.	4
Total	4

Withdrawals & dropouts

Period	Reason	FG000
Overall Study	unable to schedule	10

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic	SMA Visit Intervention Arm
Age, Categorical <=18 years	4 Participants
Age, Categorical >=65 years	0 Participants
Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years	0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino	1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino	3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported	0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native	0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB) Asian	0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American	3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race	0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported	0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB) White	1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Female	2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Male	2 Participants

Adverse events

Event type	EG000 affected / at risk	EG001 affected / at risk
deaths Total, all-cause mortality	0 / 4	0 / 4
other Total, other adverse events	0 / 4	0 / 4
serious Total, serious adverse events	0 / 4	0 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Frequency of SMA Sessions Attended, as Assessed by Tracking Study Visit Attendance.

For those who agree to enroll, investigators will document if participants attended or were absent from scheduled study visits. At the completion of the study, attendance will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% sessions attended among study participants as a measure of feasibility.

Time frame: 12 months

Arm	Measure	Value (MEDIAN)
SMA Visit Intervention Arm	Frequency of SMA Sessions Attended, as Assessed by Tracking Study Visit Attendance.	90 percentage of visits attended

Primary

Perceived Benefit of the SMA Intervention Content, as Measured by User Satisfaction Surveys Summary Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation as Well as Percent Answering a Specific Likert Level)

Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention benefit. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived benefit as a measure of acceptability.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: user satisfaction ratings were not collected given the small study sample population, instead, semi-structured interviews were performed to collect acceptability data

Primary

Perceived Satisfaction of SMA Intervention as Assessed by Semi-structured Interviews.

Thematic analysis of qualitative data will be conducted by two team members who independently review interview transcripts to generate initial codes. Initial codes will be discussed by the group to generate a list of second-cycle codes and each team member will then apply coding framework to all transcripts before identifying dominant themes. ATLAS.ti software will be used to organize and analyze qualitative data.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 2 youth-caregiver dyads participated in semi-structured interviews

Arm	Measure	Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SMA Visit Intervention Arm	Perceived Satisfaction of SMA Intervention as Assessed by Semi-structured Interviews.	2 Participants

Primary

Perceived Utility of the SMA Intervention Content, as Measured by User Satisfaction Surveys Summary Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation as Well as Percent Answering a Specific Likert Level)

Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention utility. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived utility as a measure of acceptability.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: user satisfaction ratings were not collected given the small study sample population, instead, semi-structured interviews were performed to collect acceptability data

Primary

Percentage of Eligible Participants Who Agreed to Participate as Assessed by Tracking Those Who Were Approached to Participate and Those Who Agreed to Participate

Investigators will track all patients who screened eligible to participate in the study, as well as those who that were contacted to gauge interest in participating. Investigators will track the percent of people who agreed to participate from those that were approached, with the goal of \>60% of those reached/eligible to participate agreeing to enroll as a measure of feasibility.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Inclusion criteria: ages 8-12 years, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) or Latinx, publicly insured, insulin pump naïve, recent HbA1c \>8%

Arm	Measure	Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SMA Visit Intervention Arm	Percentage of Eligible Participants Who Agreed to Participate as Assessed by Tracking Those Who Were Approached to Participate and Those Who Agreed to Participate	14 Participants

Primary

Percentage of Participants With CGM Use, as Assessed by Tracking CGM Use Status From Enrollment to the End of the Study.

For those who agree to enroll, investigators will classify participant's CGM use status at time of enrollment as either current CGM users, never CGM users, or those with CGM attrition. At the completion of the study, CGM use status will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% current CGM users among study participants as a measure of feasibility.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: SMA intervention participants

Arm	Measure	Value (MEDIAN)
SMA Visit Intervention Arm	Percentage of Participants With CGM Use, as Assessed by Tracking CGM Use Status From Enrollment to the End of the Study.	87.5 percentage of 14 day CGM wear

Secondary

CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale

The CGM Benefits and Burdens scale is widely used for measuring perceptions of CGM benefit and burdens. Raw scores range from 1-5 for each question, with higher scores reflecting greater burdens/benefits. Total scores are scaled and combined, ranging from 0-200. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.