Skip to content

High Dose Inspiratory Muscle Training in LOPD

High-dose Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) in Late-onset Pompe Disease (LOPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05431127
Enrollment
34
Registered
2022-06-24
Start date
2022-07-19
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2025-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Late-Onset Pompe Disease, Lysosomal Disease

Keywords

LOPD

Brief summary

Study Objectives: 1) assess the safety and feasibility of high-dose inspiratory muscle training (IMT) delivered remotely in Late-onset Pompe Disease (LOPD) and 2) determine its effects on respiratory and patient-reported outcomes.

Detailed description

This study aims to develop treatments that enhance respiratory strength and function to provide meaningful clinical improvements for people with LOPD. Identification of a cost-effective adjunctive intervention to address respiratory weakness remains critical to reduce disease burden, ease activity limitations and participation restrictions, and improve health-related quality of life. The proposed study will provide a high-dose inspiratory muscle training (IMT) stimulus to enhance treatment efficacy and efficiency. Our hypothesis is that high-dose IMT is necessary to produce meaningful changes in respiratory muscle strength and other outcomes in participants with LOPD.

Interventions

DEVICEIMT therapy using the Pr02 mobile device

Inspiratory Muscle Training using a device used to measure and increase respiratory strength and performance through resisted breathing exercises.

Sponsors

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Confirmed diagnosis of LOPD * MIP \>50% of predicted for sex and age * Stable on current Pompe disease treatment regimen \>6 months * Able to follow directions for study participation * Access to computer and smartphone/tablet with reliable internet connection for video visits and sensor-based respiratory technologies

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of medical comorbidities that prevent meaningful study participation (e.g., COPD GOLD III-IV, significant mental illness, dementia) * Use of continuous invasive or non-invasive ventilation while awake * Prior history of gene therapy for LOPD * Inability to give legally effective consent * Inability to read and understand English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post test, measured in cm H20

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in inspiratory power curve (IPC)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post test, measured in pressure-time units (PTUs)
Change in forced vital capacity (FVC)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters using a portable hand-held spirometer
Change in inspiratory duration (ID)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post test, measured by duration in seconds
Change in fatigue index test score (FIT)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post test, a proprietary measure which quantifies propensity to inspiratory muscle fatigue based upon the relationship between inspiratory capacity and demand using the following equation: (IPC \[in Watts\] x MID) / (Power500 x T500), where Power500 = power expended to inspire a mass of 500 mL air and T500 = time when mass of inspired air=500 mL at sea level
Change in forced expiratory volume over 1 second (FEV1)Baseline, week 15, week 30change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters per second using a portable hand-held spirometer
Change in peak expiratory flow (PEF)Baseline, week 15, week 30change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters per second using portable hand-held spirometer
Change in inspiratory phase duration (IPD)Baseline, week 15, week 30change pre-test to post-test, measured in seconds
Change in inspiratory peak flow (IPF)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters per second
Change in voice qualityBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) survey completion using a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=almost always, 4=always). Item responses are added to obtain a total score (values \>11 abnormal) with higher scores indicating greater perception of voice-related handicap.
Change in compression phase duration (CPD)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured in seconds
Change in maximum expiratory pressure (MEP)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post test, measured in cm H20
Change in cough volume acceleration (CVA)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by EPF/EPRT
Change in fatigueBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) survey completion, using a 7 point ordinal scale where a rating of 1 indicates strong disagreement and a rating of 7 indicates strong agreement.
Change in impact of fatigue on quality of life (QOL)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) survey completion using a score of 0 (never affected) to 4 (almost always affected). The total score ranges from 0 to a maximum of 84. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fatigue on quality of life.
Change in daytime sleepinessBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) survey completion using a 0 to 3 ordinal scale in which 0=no chance of dozing, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2= moderate chance of dozing, and 3=high chance of dozing. Scores are summed to obtain total ESS score where a score \>10 reflects excessive daytime sleepiness.
Change in sleep qualityBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) survey completion. The PSQI is a 9-question, 19-item instrument. Items 1 to 4 are open-ended questions (customary bedtime, length of time to fall asleep). Items 5 to 8 (including the 10 questions comprising item 5) are sleep symptoms which are rated as to their frequency using an ordinal scale: 0=not occurring in the last month, 1=less than once a week, 2=once or twice a week, and 3=three or more times a week. Item 9 is a rating of overall sleep quality over the past month using a 0 to 3 ordinal scale: 0=very good; 1=fairly good; 2= fairly bad; and 3=very bad. Scores from the 19-items are combined according to standard scoring criteria to obtain a Global PSQI score. Scores \>5 indicate reduced sleep quality.
Change in respiratory symptomsBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Respiratory Symptoms Questionnaire (RSQ) completion using a 0-3 scale where a higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Change in motor performanceBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Rotterdam Handicap Scale (RHS) survey completion using a ranging scale of 1 - 4 where 1 = unable to fulfil the task or activity and 4 = complete fulfillment of the task or activity. Scores are summed and range from 9-36.
Change in health-related quality of lifeBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey completion where physical and mental component summary scales (PCS and MCS) are calculated from the subscales and transformed to a normalized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better health-related quality of life.
Change in ability to communicateBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Communicative Participation Item Bank-Short From (CPIB-10) survey completion using a 4-point scale (not at all=3, a little=2, quite a bit=1, very much=0). Item scores are added to obtain the summary score which ranges from 0-30. This can be transformed into a standard T score (mean=50, SD=10). Higher scores represent less interference in communication participation.
Change in swallowing symptomsBaseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) survey completion using a 5-point scale (0=no problem, 4=severe problem). Item responses are added to obtain a total score (values \>3 abnormal) with higher scores indicating greater severity of swallowing symptoms.
Change in expiratory phase rise time (EPRT)Baseline, week 15, week 30Change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters per second

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026