Skip to content

abSorbable vErsus Non-absorbable SuturEs for Wound Closure in Carpal Tunnel Release

Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures for Wound Closure in Carpal Tunnel Release: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05431101
Acronym
SENSE
Enrollment
2604
Registered
2022-06-24
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2025-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Suture, Complication, Wound Infection

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome, wound infection, absorbable sutures, non-absorbable sutures

Brief summary

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is a prevalent condition, up to 9% in women and 0.6% in men. Surgical decompression in the most effective treatment. After surgery, approximately 1,8% of the patients develop a wound infection. Possibly, the type of sutures used can influence the prevalence of wound infection. In this RCT the incidence of infection is investigated between the use of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures in carpal tunnel release.

Detailed description

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is a prevalent condition; up to 9% in women and 0.6% in men. It causes complaints of paresthesia, pain, numbness and loss of strength. Surgical decompression is the most effective treatment. After surgery, approximately 1,8% of the patients develop a wound infection. Possibly, the type of suture material which is used can influence the prevalence of wound infection. In current clinical practice both absorbable and non absorbable sutures are used. In literature, various hypothesis are described: Absorbable sutures could give more reaction of macrophages and therefore a higher chance on infection. This would not be the case for non-absorbable sutures, since they will be removed. However, in literature, there is still not enough evidence for superiority of absorbable or non-absorbable suture. In this RCT the incidence of infection is investigated between the use of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures in carpal tunnel release. The primary outcome is the ASEPSIS wound score. This will be scored by independent investigators. Use of antibiotics, handtherapy and extra outpatient visits will be recorded. Patients are asked to register their NRS scores the first three weeks after surgery.

Interventions

Transection of flexor retinaculum for patients who have carpal tunnel syndrome

Sponsors

Deventer Ziekenhuis
CollaboratorOTHER
Gelre Hospitals
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• indication for carpal tunnel release

Exclusion criteria

* carpal tunnel syndrome which has yet been operated * injection with corticosteroids

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ASEPSIS wound score (Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria, and Stay as inpatient prolonged over 14 days)10 to 14 days post surgeryscore based on a picture made of the wound 10-14 days post carpal tunnel release. Minimum score 0, maximum score 70, score above 40 is categorized as wound infection

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NRS score (Numeric Rating Scale for pain)until three weeks post surgerypain score, minimum score 0, maximum score 10. Unbearable pain is scored as 10, no pain is scored as 0.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactPauline Verhaegen, MD PHD
paulineverhaegen@hotmail.com0555811244

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026