Skip to content

Assess the Influence of Nicotine Flux and Nicotine Form on Subjective Effects Related to Dependency

Nicotine Flux, a Potentially Powerful Tool for Regulating Nicotine Delivery From Electronic Cigarettes: Significance of Nicotine Flux to the Rate of Nicotine Delivery and Subjective Effect

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05430334
Enrollment
130
Registered
2022-06-24
Start date
2022-07-13
Completion date
2025-07-11
Last updated
2025-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nicotine Addiction, Nicotine Dependence, Nicotine Vaping

Keywords

Nicotine, Nicotine Flux, Vaping, ENDS, Aerosol, Combustible

Brief summary

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) heat and vaporize a nicotine-containing liquid to produce an aerosol that can deliver nicotine to the blood and the brain. ENDS use has increased rapidly in the last decade, especially among youth: over 20% of US high school students are current ENDS users, and there is evidence of nicotine dependence in this population. Federal legislation has been proposed that would restrict ENDS liquid nicotine concentration to make ENDS significantly less addictive and appealing to youth. However, these and other efforts to curb addiction by limiting nicotine liquid concentration are unlikely to succeed because nicotine emissions from ENDS depend on multiple variables. To achieve the intended public health aims, regulations targeting addiction must focus on nicotine delivery, not nicotine concentration. While nicotine delivery cannot be regulated directly, the rate at which an ENDS emits nicotine, the nicotine flux, can be regulated and, importantly, predicted based on a few device design and operating variables. However, to date there is no empirical evidence demonstrating the relationship between flux and delivery, nor between flux and the subjective effects that support nicotine dependence. Closing this gap is essential for providing an effective framework for regulating ENDS. At the American University of Beirut, the investigators will assess the relationship between nicotine flux, form, and subjective effects. Participants will use ENDS devices with varying nicotine fluxes and forms. Dependency measures, such as urge to smoke, craving, and abstinence, will be assessed. The outcome will indicate the degree to which nicotine flux/form influence subjective effects related to dependency, puffing intensity, and exposure to toxicants. In summary, this project will provide the empirical evidence needed for public health agencies to use nicotine flux as an encompassing and convenient construct to regulate nicotine delivery from ENDS.

Detailed description

Assess the influence of nicotine flux and nicotine form on subjective effects. At AUB, the investigators will assess subjective effects (e.g. product liking, nicotine craving) and puffing topography for 130 participants who will undergo 5 ENDS use sessions (combinations 1-5) consisting of 2 bouts (10 puffs + 60min ad libitum) with 2 fluxes (16 and 32μg/s) x 2 forms (protonated, freebase) and a 0 nicotine condition. In addition, the investigators will use a state-of-the-art device to sample in situ a fraction of the aerosol generated during each puff to verify actual nicotine flux and form, and measure exposure to pulmonary toxicants (carbonyls). The investigators hypothesize that increasing nicotine flux and protonated nicotine will result in greater reductions of nicotine craving, and lower puffing intensity and carbonyl exposure. In addition, 10 participants that completed the five use sessions will attend the lab for one additional visit with the aim of determining the influence of puff-by-puff variation of ENDS power and liquid composition on puffing behavior and sensory effects. During this visit participants will complete three directed puffing bouts (10 puffs). In each bout, participants will alternate puffs between two identical ENDS devices differing by a single design factor (combinations 6-8).

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTe-liquid 1

30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 4mg/ml protonated

COMBINATION_PRODUCTe-liquid 2

30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 10mg/ml protonated

COMBINATION_PRODUCTe-liquid 3

30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 4mg/ml free base

COMBINATION_PRODUCTe-liquid 4

30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 10mg/ml freebase

COMBINATION_PRODUCTe-liquid 5

30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 0mg/ml (placebo)

COMBINATION_PRODUCTe-liquid 6

30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 0mg/ml

COMBINATION_PRODUCTe-liquid 7 and e-liquid 8

e-liquid 7: 30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 4mg/ml protonated e-liquid 8: 30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 8mg/ml protonated

COMBINATION_PRODUCTe-liquid 9 and e-liquid 10

e-liquid 9: 30/70 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 4mg/ml protonated e-liquid 10: 70/30 PG/VG ratio with nicotine concentration 4mg/ml protonated

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Each participant will attend the lab for five different visits that differ by nicotine flux and/or form in random order. All sessions will be double-blind (Participant / Investigator). The analytical chemist will be providing the investigator with e-liquid in a random order in each session for each participant.

Intervention model description

Each participant will attend the lab for five different visits that differ by nicotine flux and/or form in random order.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Must be healthy and above 18 years of age * Must be willing to provide informed consent, attend the lab, and abstain from tobacco/nicotine as required (participants will be instructed to abstain from nicotine/tobacco and/or ENDS use for ≥12h) * A dual ENDS and tobacco user who reports daily use of ENDS (≥ 3 mg/ml nicotine) or cigarettes (any frequency) AND someday use (≥ 3 days/week) of ENDS (≥ 3 mg/ml nicotine) or cigarettes (any frequency) for the past 3 months or longer

Exclusion criteria

* History of chronic disease or an uncontrolled psychiatric condition * History of or active cardiovascular disease, low/high blood pressure, seizures, regular use of a prescription medication (except vitamins/birth control) * Past month use of cocaine, opioids, benzodiazepines, or methamphetamines * Individuals who report using marijuana \>15/30 days * Women will be excluded if they are breast-feeding or pregnant * Participants intending to quit tobacco/nicotine use in the next 30 days and referred to cessation treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Measures of Nicotine Abstinence Symptoms - Hughes and HatsukamiUp to 180 minutesThe Hughes-Hatsukami Withdrawal Questionnaire (HHWQ) will be assessed by the Hughes and Hatsukami 1986 questionnaire on a subjective scale (0-100, Not at all - extremely).
Subjective Measures of Nicotine Abstinence Symptoms - PROMIS-10 Global Health measuresVisit 1 - Before starting the first sessionThe PROMIS-10 Global Health measures five domains: physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social health. 10 Items are rated on a five-point scale (Poor=1, Fair=2, Good=3, Very good=4, Excellent=5) with higher scores indicating higher activity.
Subjective Measures of Nicotine Abstinence Symptoms - The corresponding 4-item E-Cigarette DependenceVisit 1 - Before starting the first sessionThe corresponding 4-item E-Cigarette Dependence Scale that assesses dependence on ENDS. 4 Items are rated on a five-point scale (Never=1, Rarely=2, Sometimes=3, Often=4, Almost Always=5) with higher scores indicating higher activity.
Subjective Measures of Nicotine Abstinence Symptoms - The corresponding 4-item Combustible cigarette DependenceVisit 1 - Before starting the first sessionThe corresponding 4-item Combustible cigarette Dependence Scale that assesses nicotine dependence for daily and nondaily smokers. 4 Items are rated on a five-point scale (Never=1, Rarely=2, Sometimes=3, Often=4, Always=5) with higher scores indicating higher activity.
Nicotine Dependence questionnaires - The Fagerstrom Test of Nicotine DependenceVisit 1 - Before starting the first sessionThe Fagerstrom Test of Nicotine Dependence questionnaires that assesses nicotine dependence on ENDS. General questions not based on a scale.
Subjective Measures of Nicotine Abstinence Symptoms - Product liking magnitude scaleUp to 180 minutesProduct liking will be assessed by the Electronic Cigarette Specific Effects questionnaire, general labeled magnitude scale (gLMS) on a subjective scale (0-100, not at all - extremely), with higher scores indicating higher effects.
Subjective Measures of Nicotine Abstinence Symptoms - Product liking hedonic scaleUp to 180 minutesProduct liking will be assessed by the Electronic Cigarette Specific Effects questionnaire, general labeled hedonic scale (LHS) (0-100, most disliked sensation imaginable - most liked sensation imaginable), with higher scores indicating higher effects.
Subjective Measures of Nicotine Abstinence Symptoms - Drug EffectUp to 180 minutesThe Drug Effect Questionnaire (DEQ) will measure acute effects consisting of seven items: drug strength, high, feeling stimulated, good effects, bad effects, wanting more drugs, and drug liking and this will be assessed on a subjective scale (0-100, not at all-extremely), with higher scores indicating higher effects.
Subjective Measures of Nicotine Abstinence Symptoms - Smoking urgesUp to 180 minutesSmoking urges will be assessed by the smoking urges questionnaire on a subjective scale (0-100, Strongly disagree - strongly agree) with higher scores indicating higher urges.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Puff DurationWill be measured during the approximately 5-minute, 10-puff use bout and 60-minute, ad lib use boutMeasured topography Average Puff Duration (sec).
Flow rateWill be measured during the approximately 5-minute, 10-puff use bout and 60-minute, ad lib use boutMeasured topography Average Flow rate (LPM).
Puff IntervalWill be measured during the approximately 5-minute, 10-puff use bout and 60-minute, ad lib use boutMeasured topography Average Inter Puff Interval (sec).
Number of PuffsWill be measured during the approximately 60-minute, ad lib use boutMeasured topography Total Number of Puffs (puffs).
Liquid consumedWill be measured after the approximately 5-minute, 10-puff use bout and 60-minute, ad lib use boutLiquid consumption for each participant use session will be determined by pre- and post-weighing the ENDS device tank (g/session).
Carbonyl compound yieldWill be measured after the 60-minute, ad lib use boutTotal Carbonyls Compounds will be quantified (microg/session).
Nicotine fluxWill be measured after the approximately 5-minute, 10-puff use bout and 60-minute, ad lib use boutNicotine flux will be quantified (mg/sec).
Sensory Feedback - Perceived MouthfulWill be measured during the approximately 5-minute, 10-puff use boutThe perceived mouthful will be assessed using the following question: How would you rate the amount of smoke filling your mouth during the puff you just smoked?. A subjective visual analog scale will be used (1-5, barely any smoke- a lot of smoke) with higher scores indicating higher mouthful.
Sensory feedback - Perceived Draw EffortWill be measured during the approximately 5-minute, 10-puff use boutThe perceived draw effort will be assessed using the following question: How would you rate the effort needed to draw the puff you just smoked?. A subjective visual analog scale will be used (1-5, easy- hard) with higher scores indicating harder draw effort.

Countries

Lebanon

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026