Skip to content

Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy.

A Randomized Comparison Between the Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for First-attempt Intubation Success With the C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy in Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airway

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05429125
Acronym
VIFLEXTIPOR
Enrollment
140
Registered
2022-06-23
Start date
2022-06-17
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Keywords

intubation, difficult airway, videolaryngoscope, operating room, Awake intubation

Brief summary

Although VLs improve glottic visualization, on many occasions it may not be accompanied by intubation at the first attempt, because the endotracheal tube has to pass a sharp angle to enter the trachea. To avoid this limitation, a new flexible tip bougie is designed to flexibly navigate the distal tip and help facilitate precise insertion of the endotracheal tube in the trachea. The flexible tip bougie has an integrated slider along the surface which moves the tip anterior and posterior while the pre-curved distal portion of shaft allows the angulation to provide anterior flexion. This new flexible tip bougie could be used as a rescue when first intubation failure using the videolaryngoscopy, or as a first option to improve the percentage of patients intubated at the first attempt.

Detailed description

The purpose of this prospective randomized study is to compare successful intubation on the first attempt with the new flexible tip bougie versus endotracheal tube with stylet during awake intubation with videolaryngoscopy in patients with anticipated difficult airway.

Interventions

Patients randomised to Endotracheal Tube with Stylet will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with an endotracheal tube + stylet.

Patients randomised to Flexible Tip Bougie will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a Flexible Tip Bougie.

Sponsors

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years and older * Patients with anticipated difficult airway requiring intubation under with a videolaryngoscopy * Written informed consent from the patient or proxy (if present) before inclusion or once possible when patient has been included in a context of emergency.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * age \<18 years * refusal of the patient * patient's respiratory failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the first attempt intubation success rate (percentage)During intubationTo compare the difference in the first attempt intubation success rate (percentage) with the two differents devices compared.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the incidence of complications (percentage)Participants will be followed from the beginning of the intervention to 30 minutes after the interventionTo compare the difference in complications (percentage) with the two different devices compared: Hypoxemia (SpO2) \< 90 %, Hypoxemia severe (SpO2) \< 80 %, Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg, Severe hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 65 mm Hg, Cardiac arrest, death during intubation, Moderate or difficult intubation, oesophageal intubation, pulmonary aspiration, dental injuries.
Difficulty of intubationDuring intubationOperator-assessed subjective difficulty of intubation by means of a special analogue numerical scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no subjective difficulty and 10=maximal subjective difficulty
Difference in the overall intubation success rate (percentage)During intubationTo compare the difference overall intubation success rate (percentage) with the two differents devices compared.
Additional airway equipmentDuring intubationNeed for additional airway equipment
Number of intubation attemptsDuring intubationNumber of intubation attempts
Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic viewDuring intubationModified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view: I: full view of the glottis IIa: partial view of the glottis IIb: arytenoid or posterior part of the vocal cords just visible III: only epiglottis visible IV: neither glottis nor epiglottis visible

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactManuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
manutabo@yahoo.es0034-981950674
Backup ContactManuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
manuel.taboada.muniz@sergas.es678195618

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026