Prostate Cancer, Prostate Cancer Stage
Conditions
Brief summary
In this study, it is aimed to compare the lesion location, lesion size, local and distant metastases detection rates of Ga68 PSMA PET and Multiparametric Prostate MR imaging tests used in staging in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. The pathologies of the patients who were decided to undergo radical prostatectomy as a treatment will also be compared with the staging tests.
Interventions
Comparison of Ga68 PSMA PET and Multiparametric Prostate MR imaging tests used in staging in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
47 male patients who will be evaluated with both imaging studies will be included in the study.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* diagnosed with prostate cancer * Gleason score 7 or above / 6 with high risk * No other treatment
Exclusion criteria
* treated with radiotherapy * treated with ADT
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lesion location | Between prostate biopsy and curative treatment decision , usually 2 month | Both MRI and PET results will be compared. Lesion location will be defined as left, right, apical, basal, midline. |
| Lesion Size | Between prostate biopsy and curative treatment decision , usually 2 month | Both MRI and PET results will be compared, Lesion size will be stated in milimeters. |
| Lymph node involvement | Between prostate biopsy and curative treatment decision , usually 2 month | Both MRI and PET results will be compared. Involvement will be stated as exist, non-exist. |
| Extraprostatic involvement | Between prostate biopsy and curative treatment decision , usually 2 month | Both MRI and PET results will be compared. Involvement will be stated as exist , non-exist. |
| Local and distant metastasis | Between prostate biopsy and curative treatment decision , usually 2 month | Both MRI and PET results will be compared. Metastasis will be stated as exist , non-exist. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)