Skip to content

Feasibility Evaluation of Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses Manufactured With an Alternative Hydration Process

Feasibility Evaluation of Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses Manufactured With an Alternative Hydration Process

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05427539
Enrollment
66
Registered
2022-06-22
Start date
2022-07-12
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2023-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ocular Physiology

Brief summary

This is a bilateral wear, dispensing, randomized, controlled, double-masked, 2-sequence × 2-period crossover study to evaluate ocular physiology following approximately one week of contact lens wear.

Interventions

DEVICETEST LENS

AO1DfA manufactured with PG hydration

AO1DfA manufactured with IPA hydration

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: The subject must: 1. Read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 2. Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 3. Be between 18 and 39 (inclusive) years of age at the time of screening. 4. By self-report, habitually wear soft contact lenses in both eyes in a daily reusable or daily disposable wear modality (i.e. not extended wear modality). Habitual wear is defined as a minimum of 6 hours of wear per day, for a minimum of 2 days per week during the past month. 5. Possess a wearable pair of spectacles that provide correction for distance vision. 6. In both eyes, have astigmatic refractive error suitable for correction with the toric contact lens powers available in this study: 1. Sphere powers (DS) -1.50 through -4.00 (inclusive) in 0.25 steps 2. Cylinder powers (DC) -0.75 and -1.25 3. Axes (°) 170, 180, 10, 80, 90, 100 7. Have best corrected monocular distance visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study: The submit must not: 1. Be currently pregnant or lactating. 2. Be diabetic. 3. Be currently using any ocular medications or have an ocular infection of any type. 4. By self-report, have any ocular or systemic disease, allergies, infection, or use of medication that might contraindicate or interfere with contact lens wear, or otherwise compromise study endpoints, including infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis), contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., Human Immunodeficiency Virus \[HIV\]), autoimmune disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome), or history of serious mental illness or seizures. See section 9.1 for additional details regarding excluded systemic medications. 5. Have habitually worn rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses, orthokeratology lenses, or hybrid lenses (e.g. SynergEyes, SoftPerm) within the past 6 months. 6. Be currently wearing monovision or multifocal contact lenses. 7. Be currently wearing lenses in an extended wear modality. 8. Have a history of strabismus or amblyopia. 9. Be an employee (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician) or immediate family member of an employee (including partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild or sibling of the employee or their spouse) of the clinical site. 10. Have participated in a contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 7 days prior to study enrollment. 11. Have clinically significant (grade 3 or higher on the FDA grading scale) slit lamp findings (e.g., corneal edema, neovascularization or staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection) or other corneal or ocular disease or abnormalities that contraindicate contact lens wear or may otherwise compromise study endpoints (including entropion, ectropion, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, aphakia, moderate or above corneal distortion, herpetic keratitis). 12. Have fluctuations in vision due to clinically significant dry eye or other ocular conditions. 13. Have had or have planned (within the study period) any ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, iridotomy, retinal laser photocoagulation, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp FindingsUp to 1-Week Follow-upSlit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 1-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher was reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 66 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of those enrolled, 65 subjects were dispensed at least one study lens, while 1 subject failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of those dispensed, 62 subjects completed the study while 3 subjects were discontinued.

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1Unsatisfactory Lens Fitting due to Test Article11
Period 1Withdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal
Age, Continuous30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.59
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
57 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 640 / 63
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 640 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 640 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings

Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 1-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher was reported.

Time frame: Up to 1-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects that were dispensed at least one study lens.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Senofilcon A Manufactured With PG HydrationProportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings0 proportion of eyes
Senofilcon A Manufactured With IPA HydrationProportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings0 proportion of eyes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026