Skip to content

Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

Comparison of the Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace on Pain, Heart Rate, Work Performance and Physical Capacities Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05425693
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-06-21
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2022-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injuries, Pain

Keywords

Pain / injuries / warm-up intervention / vineyard workers / physical activity

Brief summary

Background: Physical activity programs at the workplace have shown positive results on physical capacities and pain for several years. Due to the duration of the training session, the need of instructor, and the need of a place to practice, these programs are commonly complex to implement. For this reason, many of companies, especially companies in manual sectors are turning to another solution, i.e warm-up intervention before work shift. These interventions present on paper numerous advantages such as short duration, no need to specifically allocate a place in companies and the possibility to perform exercises in working clothes… Surprisingly, while positive effects of warm-up interventions on pain, performance physical and psychological capacities, are expansively reported in sport context, effects of workplace warm-up intervention are lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to implement such intervention among vineyard-workers, workers highly exposed to heavy physical workload and pain and (2) to assess their effects on physical (pain, strength, flexibility) and psychological (workload) functions and also on work-related outcomes (work performance, readiness to work) Methods: A cluster randomized study will be implemented among French vineyard workers. Four groups of 30 participants will be constituted; corresponding to four different conditions: (1) hybrid warm-up intervention (HWU); (2) dynamic warm-up intervention (DWU); (3) stretching warm-up intervention (SWU); (4) no warm-up intervention (NWU). A total of 120 vineyard-workers will be recruited to participate in the study. Discussion: The results will provide more evidence about the short-term effects of warm-up interventions at the workplace, and will provide more evidence on which warm-up modality is the most effective on pain, performance, physical and psychological capacities among vineyard workers.

Interventions

OTHERHybrid Warm-up

Dynamic + stretching exercises

OTHERDynamic Warm-up

Dynamic exercises

OTHERStretching Warm-up

Stretching exercises

Sponsors

University Grenoble Alps
CollaboratorOTHER
Opti'Mouv
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A cluster randomized study will be implemented among French vineyard workers. Four groups of 30 participants will be constituted; corresponding to four different conditions: (1) hybrid warm-up intervention (HWU); (2) dynamic warm-up intervention (DWU); (3) stretching warm-up intervention (SWU); (4) no warm-up intervention (NWU). A total of 120 vineyard-workers will be recruited to participate in the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* working full time * having at least 1 year of employment in the company

Exclusion criteria

\- not to present previous surgery in the low back region in the last 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived pain intensityPain intensity will be rated for the last 3 monthsParticipants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate no pain while 10 indicate the worst possible pain.
Work performanceAfter one hour of work (Time 3)number of grapevine pruned

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart rateTime 0Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Readiness to workTime 1Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate not at all ready and 10 perfectly ready to work
Handgrip StrengthBefore the warm-up intervention (Time 0)Handgrip Strength
WorkloadTime 5NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX) is a multi-dimensional scale used to estimate workload from a worker.
Visuomotor reaction timeTime 0The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Work qualityTime 5Work quality will be assessed by the workers supervisors, with the same 0-10 scale in every company, developed by the research team and a vineyard growing specialist.
FlexibilityBefore the warm-up intervention (Time 0)Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026