Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
hypertension management, blood pressure monitoring
Brief summary
Explore barriers, facilitators, acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity of the telemedicine management of hypertension intervention
Detailed description
The purpose of the current study is to conduct pre-implementation work to understand the determinants of the telemedicine management of hypertension intervention implementation, feasibility of the intervention and its tailoring, and explore potential inequitable implementation factors in African American patients to enhance the intervention's usability to inform future hybrid trial design.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALTelemedicine Management of Hypertension
Telemedicine Management of high blood pressure using home blood pressure monitoring and telemedicine based hypertension self- management support and pharmacotherapy. This will be supplemented by support from community health workers.
Sponsors
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
enroll up to 10 patients/clinic
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Patients: * \> 18 years of age * diagnosis of Hypertension (HTN) * systolic Blood Pressure \> 140mmHg on last two clinic visits * stable anti-HTN medication in the preceding six weeks * possess smart phone * must speak and read English
Exclusion criteria
Patients: * conditions that diminish the ability to conduct home-based self-assessments of Blood Pressure * chronic conditions that add complexity in HTN management * recent acute health changes that increases likelihood of Blood Pressure instability * terminal illness Inclusion Criteria Stakeholders: * identify stakeholders using Mendelow's stakeholder matrix, which helps recognize stakeholders according to their interest and power in using the intervention in their clinic - Stakeholders are from clinic and community health workers
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of Intervention (AIM) | Month 3 | Acceptability will be assessed using mixed methods from both patients and stakeholders. The study team will derive themes from relevant constructs about implementation acceptability using qualitative interviews. The study team will complement this using a quantitative measure, Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), which is a validated four item generic implementation outcome measures to assess implementation acceptability. Embedded mixed methods will allow alignment in results of the qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide context, complementarity, and convergence. |
| Appropriateness of Intervention (IAM) | Month 3 | Appropriateness will be assessed using mixed methods from both patients and stakeholders. The study team will derive themes from relevant constructs about implementation appropriateness using qualitative interviews. The study team will complement this using a quantitative measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), which is a validated four item generic implementation outcome measures to assess implementation appropriateness. Embedded mixed methods will allow alignment in results of the qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide context, complementarity, and convergence. |
| Feasibility of Intervention (FIM) | Month 3 | Feasibility will be assessed using mixed methods from both patients and stakeholders. The study team will derive themes from relevant constructs about implementation feasibility using qualitative interviews. The study team will complement this using a quantitative measure, Feasibility Intervention Measure (FIM), which is a validated four item generic implementation outcome measures to assess implementation feasibility. Embedded mixed methods will allow alignment in results of the qualitative and quantitative analyses to provide context, complementarity, and convergence. As an additional feasibility outcome, the study team will assess the proportion of eligible and screened patients who agree to participate as well as those who decline (with reasons). |
| Fidelity of Intervention/implementation | Month 3 | The study team will assess implementation fidelity both at the provider level (number of contacts between patients and nurses; number of pharmacologic activations) and at the patient level (number of home blood pressure data transferred). |
| Cost Estimates | Month 3 | The study team will estimate cost by calculating the numbers of clinic staff needed and the time spent (by provider type) per patient as well as other resources required for implementation. The study team will document resource commitment (e.g., staff time by provider type \[nurses, advanced practice providers, physicians, community health workers\], equipment, support \[investigative team's support for device set-up, technical and implementation help\]) for cost assessments. The study team will stratify cost related to the intervention and implementation strategy. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed