Skip to content

Outcome, Hindsight and Implicit Bias in Emergency Medicine and Medical Disciplinary Law.

Outcome, Hindsight and Implicit Bias in Emergency Medicine and Medical Disciplinary Law.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05424497
Acronym
OHIBEM
Enrollment
350
Registered
2022-06-21
Start date
2022-06-16
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2022-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergencies, Implicit Bias

Brief summary

Background Hindsight bias and outcome bias may play an important role in retrospective law of errors in Emergency Medicine and may affect judgement. In addition, differences in sex and medical history may affect treatment decisions (implicit bias). Aims First, to assess if and to what extent knowledge of an outcome may affect the ability of Emergency Physicians and physicians with experience in disciplinary law to determine the quality of care given. Secondly, to investigate whether a medical history with nonspecific/functional/somatoform complaints and sex differences affect clinical decision making in Emergency Physicians. Study design and analyses A web-based cross-sectional survey using vignettes with six clinical scenarios (four vignettes for outcome/hindsight bias, four vignettes for implicit bias). The survey was sent to all Emergency Physicians and residents in training in the Netherlands. Four scenarios were also sent to physicians with experience in disciplinary law. In four vignettes, participants received a scenario without an outcome, or with a positive or negative outcome. They were asked to rate the quality of care provided as sufficient or insufficient and, in more detail, poor/below average/average/good/outstanding and how likely they thought it would be that the patient would have had a negative outcome (in percent). In the other two vignettes, participants received one vignette describing a scenario of a patient presenting to the ED with acute abdominal pain and one vignette describing a scenario with chest pain. The sex and medical history differed among the participants (e.g. male/female, nonspecific medical history/somatic medical history). Participants were asked whether they would prescribe pain medication, and whether they would do diagnostic imaging. Importance and impact This research may help to understand the impact of knowing the outcome in retrospective laws in Dutch Emergency Physicians and physicians with experience in disciplinary law. If outcome and hindsight bias are present, retrospective judgement may need a different approach in medicine, i.e. blinding judges for the outcome, to prevent wrong justice and adverse effect on clinicians well-being. Also, if implicit bias in sex and medical history is present, a training programme is needed to reduce certain bias and to improve equality in the provided care.

Interventions

OTHERVignettes

Presenting vignettes with fictive cases

Sponsors

Maxima Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Emergency physicians or residents, General practitioners, and physicians with experience in disciplinary law.

Exclusion criteria

* others

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of careThroughout the study, 1dayThe quality of care rated on a likert scale from 1 to 5 will be assessed for 4 fictive cases. The mean will be compared for each case without outcome, with positive outcome, and with negative outcome.
Diagnostic imagingThroughout the study, 1dayWhether the physician would perform diagnostic imaging after reading the vignette. The The outcome will be compared for vignettes including a somatic medical history with the vignettes with a nonsomatic medical history.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hindsight biasThroughout the study, 1dayThe estimate of the chance of getting the negative outcome (0 to 100%). Compared between the group of vignettes without outcome, with a positive outcome and with a negative outcome.
Pain medicationThroughout the study, 1dayWhether pain medication is prescribed (y/n) and how many milligrams. Compared between group of patients with somatic medical history and nonsomatic medical history.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026