Skip to content

Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients on Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) Versus Entecavir

Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients on Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) Versus Entecavir

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05423834
Enrollment
1800
Registered
2022-06-21
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Brief summary

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of tenofovir (TFV), has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. TAF has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of HBV replication at a low dose, with high intracellular concentration and more than 90% lower systemic TFV concentration than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). TAF has been approved in the clinical practice guidelines in the west. Since its availability in Asia in 2017, there have been evolving data concerning its positive impact on renal safety as shown in registration trials. The primary objective of this study is to compare the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in chronic hepatitis B patients on TAF versus ETV in a territory-wide cohort in Hong Kong.

Detailed description

Antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) has revolutionized the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the last two decades.1 Entecavir (ETV), a nucleoside analogue, is one of the first-line NAs recommended by all international treatment guidelines.2-4 As hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance rarely occurs, most patients require long-term, if not life-long, NA therapy. Hence, the safety of NAs requires careful scrutiny. In clinical trials, nephrotoxicity may occur in a small proportion of patients receiving nucleotide analogues. We previously demonstrated that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) was associated with mild renal impairment in a minority of patients; those treated with entecavir (ETV) had a similar risk compared to untreated patients.5 Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of tenofovir (TFV), has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. TAF has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of HBV replication at a low dose, with high intracellular concentration and more than 90% lower systemic TFV concentration than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). TAF has been approved in the clinical practice guidelines in the west. Since its availability in Asia in 2017, there have been evolving data concerning its positive impact on renal safety as shown in registration trials.

Interventions

DRUGTenofovir alafenamide

Chronic hepatitis B patients who are receiving TAF as antiviral therapy for CHB, who were previously treatment naïve.

DRUGEntecavir

Chronic hepatitis B patients who are receiving ETV as antiviral therapy for CHB, who were previously treatment naïve.

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or documented history of CHB for 6 months or more; AND * On TAF 25 mg daily as antiviral treatment for CHB (cases); OR * On ETV 0.5 to 1.0 mg daily as antiviral treatment for CHB (controls)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous NA treatment prior to TAF or ETV * Positive antibody against hepatitis C, D, or human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HCV, anti-HDV, or anti-HIV) * Evidence of other autoimmune or metabolic liver diseases (except non-alcoholic fatty liver disease). * Moribund state including advanced/pre-terminal liver cancer or other non-hepatic cancers * Non-hepatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy within last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CKD at 12 months12 monthsTo evaluate chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression at 12 months. The CKD progression is defined as an increase in CKD stage for at least 1 stage for at least 3 consecutive months during follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in eGFR12 monthscalculated using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation expressed as a single equation: GFR (in mL/min/1.73 m2) = 141 × min (Scr /κ, 1)α × max(Scr /κ, 1)-1.209 × 0.993Age × 1.018 \[for the cases of females\] × 1.159 \[for the cases of ethnic Africans \]; where: Scr is the serum creatinine in mg/dL (equals to serum creatinine in micromole/L /88.4) , κ is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, α is -0.329 for females and -0.411 for males, min indicates the minimum of Scr /κ or 1, and max indicates the maximum of Scr /κ or 1.11 CKD stages 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4 and 5 were defined based on eGFR

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026