Skip to content

Safety and Feasibility of Dasatinib and Quercetin in Adults at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

Senolytics To Alleviate Mobility Issues and Neurological Impairment in Aging

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05422885
Acronym
STAMINA
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-06-21
Start date
2022-05-20
Completion date
2024-01-24
Last updated
2025-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease, Senescence

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of administering intermittent doses of Dasatinib and Quercetin (D+Q) in older adults at risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The study will evaluate whether giving D+Q may improve cerebral blood flow regulation, mobility, and cognition in older adults, and thus may prevent progression to Alzheimer's disease.

Detailed description

The investigators will conduct a 12-week single arm, open label, pre-post pilot study in 12 adults aged 65 or older with slow gait speed (\<1.0 m/sec) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI, defined as a Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score (MoCA) \<19). Participants will be asked to take 100mg of Dasatinib and 1,250mg of Quercetin for 2 consecutive days, every two weeks over a period of 12 weeks (12 doses in total, given over 6 cycles). At baseline, enrolled participants will undergo gait speed and neurocognitive testing, and provide blood and urine to evaluate biomarkers of senescence. At visits 3,4, 6, and 7, participants will have safety labs drawn, and the study team will assess medication adherence and adverse events. At visits 2, 5, and 8, participants will undergo cognitive assessments, gait speed testing, cerebral blood flow and neurovascular coupling testing. At the final study visit, participants will again provide blood and urine to assess biomarkers of senescence.

Interventions

DRUGDasatinib

Dasatinib 100 mg for 2 consecutive days, every two weeks for 12 weeks

DRUGQuercetin

Quercetin 1,250 mg for 2 consecutive days, every two weeks for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Lewis Lipsitz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women \>/= 65 years * Ambulatory, * Community dwelling, * Slow gait speed (\<1 m/second), * Mild Cognitive Impairment (Telephone MoCA score \<21, which is indicative of cognitive impairment)

Exclusion criteria

, or as per clinical judgment: * Telephone MoCA score \<10 points * Unwilling to take study medications or follow study protocol * Inability to independently perform Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), * Allergies to Dasatinib or Quercetin, * Hospitalization within 6 months, * Unstable coronary artery disease (myocardial infarction within 6 months or angina), * Stroke or transient ischemic attack in the past 6 months, * Chronic heart failure, * Current or chronic history of liver disease, * Neurodegenerative disease including Parkinson's disease, * Anemia, * Chronic renal disease, * Drug or alcohol abuse in the last 5 years, * QTc prolongation, * Thrombocytopenia, * Neutropenia, * Prolonged prothrombin time or INR, * Indications of current fluid retention, * History or current diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, * Inability to insonate the middle cerebral artery through a temporal bone window on at least one side using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, or * Chronic use of any of the following medications: anti-arrhythmic medications, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, anti-platelet or anti-coagulant medications other than aspirin, quinolone antibiotics, or drugs metabolized by the same liver enzymes as Quercetin or Dasatinib.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurovascular CouplingScreening, 8, and 14 weeksChange in cerebral blood flow during an N-back cognitive task using transcranial doppler ultrasound.
Executive FunctionBaseline, 8, and 14 weeksAssess change in executive cognitive function using TRAILS test, corrected for response time. Higher scores indicate worse executive functioning.
Gait SpeedBaseline, 8, and 14 weeksAssess change in gait speed. Performed without a distracting cognitive task.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ScoreBaseline, 8, and 14 weeksThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment evaluates global cognition. Scores range from 0-30 points, with higher scores indicating better cognition

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
P16 ink4a Expression in CD3 Positive CellsScreening and 14 weeksMeasure of P16 ink4a expression in senescent CD3 lymphocytes in the blood.
Physical PerformanceBaseline, 8, and 14 weeksAssessment of overall physical function using the short physical performance battery (SPPB) scored from 0-12, based on a composite of balance, strength, and walking speed. Higher scores indicate better mobility.
SASP Factors in Blood and UrineScreening and 14 weeksMeasure of the senescence-associated biomarkers IL-1alpha picogram/mL and IL-6 picogram/mL.
MobilityBaseline, 8, and 14 weeksTest of mobility using timed up and go test, including standing from a chair, walking, and turning.
Grip StrengthBaseline, 8, and 14 weeksMeasure of grip strength using a hand dynamometer.
Gait Speed During Cognitive TaskBaseline, 8, and 14 weeksMeasure of gait speed during a cognitive task.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted from 2022-2024 in the greater Boston, MA area. Individuals were recruited through a recruitment firm that utilizes online targeted advertisements based on an individual's browsing history, as well as senior housing presentations, study flyers at clinical practices, and invitations to previous research volunteers who agreed to be in our participant registries.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 332 individuals that expressed interest in the study, 115 were screened via telephone. Sixty were ineligible due to not meeting the pre-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of the 55 eligible telephone screeners, 24 were not enrolled due to loss of interest (n=12), loss to follow-up (n=10), or closed enrolment (n=2). Of the 31 participants that were screened in-person, 16 were excluded for various reasons, while 15 individuals were eligible and willing to participate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dasatinib and Quercetin
Participants took 100 mg of Dasatinib and 1,250 mg of Quercetin for 2 consecutive days, every two weeks for 12 weeks
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDasatinib and Quercetin
4-meter Gait Speed0.8 meters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
Age, Continuous77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Body Mass Index27 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Depression4 Participants
Eye Disease8 Participants
High Blood Pressure5 Participants
High Cholesterol6 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Associates Degree
1 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Bachelors Degree
5 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Graduate/Doctoral/Law Degree
7 Participants
Highest Level of Education
No Diploma
1 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Some College/Vocational School
1 Participants
Osteo- or Degenerative Arthritis6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
Stomach Disease (e.g., Acid Reflux)7 Participants
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score17 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Executive Function

Assess change in executive cognitive function using TRAILS test, corrected for response time. Higher scores indicate worse executive functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, 8, and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinExecutive FunctionBaseline (Week 2)80.6 secondsStandard Deviation 80.2
Dasatinib and QuercetinExecutive FunctionWeek 875.0 secondsStandard Deviation 61.4
Dasatinib and QuercetinExecutive FunctionWeek 1463.4 secondsStandard Deviation 44.6
Primary

Gait Speed

Assess change in gait speed. Performed without a distracting cognitive task.

Time frame: Baseline, 8, and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinGait SpeedBaseline (Week 2)0.87 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.15
Dasatinib and QuercetinGait SpeedWeek 80.85 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.16
Dasatinib and QuercetinGait SpeedWeek 140.87 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.14
Primary

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment evaluates global cognition. Scores range from 0-30 points, with higher scores indicating better cognition

Time frame: Baseline, 8, and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ScoreBaseline23 pointsStandard Deviation 2
Dasatinib and QuercetinMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score8 Weeks25 pointsStandard Deviation 3
Dasatinib and QuercetinMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score14 Weeks24 pointsStandard Deviation 2
Primary

Neurovascular Coupling

Change in cerebral blood flow during an N-back cognitive task using transcranial doppler ultrasound.

Time frame: Screening, 8, and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinNeurovascular CouplingWeek 80.26 cm/sStandard Deviation 2.04
Dasatinib and QuercetinNeurovascular CouplingWeek 140.80 cm/sStandard Deviation 2.13
Dasatinib and QuercetinNeurovascular CouplingScreening0.68 cm/sStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Gait Speed During Cognitive Task

Measure of gait speed during a cognitive task.

Time frame: Baseline, 8, and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinGait Speed During Cognitive TaskWeek 80.75 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.16
Dasatinib and QuercetinGait Speed During Cognitive TaskWeek 140.78 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.14
Dasatinib and QuercetinGait Speed During Cognitive TaskBaseline (Week 2)0.76 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.13
Secondary

Grip Strength

Measure of grip strength using a hand dynamometer.

Time frame: Baseline, 8, and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinGrip StrengthWeek 1423.6 kilogramsStandard Deviation 5.3
Dasatinib and QuercetinGrip StrengthBaseline (Week 2)23.5 kilogramsStandard Deviation 7.2
Dasatinib and QuercetinGrip StrengthWeek 822.7 kilogramsStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Mobility

Test of mobility using timed up and go test, including standing from a chair, walking, and turning.

Time frame: Baseline, 8, and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinMobilityBaseline (Week 2)14.2 secondsStandard Deviation 2.6
Dasatinib and QuercetinMobilityWeek 813.9 secondsStandard Deviation 3.1
Dasatinib and QuercetinMobilityWeek 1413.6 secondsStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

P16 ink4a Expression in CD3 Positive Cells

Measure of P16 ink4a expression in senescent CD3 lymphocytes in the blood.

Time frame: Screening and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinP16 ink4a Expression in CD3 Positive CellsScreening10.6 relative expression to housekeeping geneStandard Deviation 5.2
Dasatinib and QuercetinP16 ink4a Expression in CD3 Positive CellsWeek 149.4 relative expression to housekeeping geneStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Physical Performance

Assessment of overall physical function using the short physical performance battery (SPPB) scored from 0-12, based on a composite of balance, strength, and walking speed. Higher scores indicate better mobility.

Time frame: Baseline, 8, and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinPhysical PerformanceBaseline (Week 2)9 pointsStandard Deviation 1
Dasatinib and QuercetinPhysical PerformanceWeek 89 pointsStandard Deviation 2
Dasatinib and QuercetinPhysical PerformanceWeek 149 pointsStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

SASP Factors in Blood and Urine

Measure of the senescence-associated biomarkers MMP-9 nanograms/mL and MMP-12 nanograms/mL.

Time frame: Screening and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinSASP Factors in Blood and UrineSerum MMP-9 Screening458.5 nanograms/mLStandard Deviation 189.4
Dasatinib and QuercetinSASP Factors in Blood and UrineSerum MMP-9 Week 14541.6 nanograms/mLStandard Deviation 454.4
Secondary

SASP Factors in Blood and Urine

Measure of the senescence-associated biomarkers IL-1alpha picogram/mL and IL-6 picogram/mL.

Time frame: Screening and 14 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dasatinib and QuercetinSASP Factors in Blood and UrineSerum IL1-alpha Screening664.5 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 368.1
Dasatinib and QuercetinSASP Factors in Blood and UrineSerum IL1-alpha Week 14742.2 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 513.1
Dasatinib and QuercetinSASP Factors in Blood and UrineSerum IL-6 Screening3.6 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 1.7
Dasatinib and QuercetinSASP Factors in Blood and UrineSerum IL-6 Week 142.8 picograms/mLStandard Deviation 1.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026