Advance Care Planning, Primary Health Care
Conditions
Keywords
Advance Care Planning, Group Medial Visit, Shared Medical Appointment
Brief summary
The main goal of the ENACT (ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks) Group Visit intervention is to integrate a patient-centered advance care planning process into primary care, ultimately helping patients to receive medical care that is aligned with their values. The ENACT Group Visit intervention involves two group discussions about advance care planning with 8-10 patients who meet for 2-hour sessions, one month apart, facilitated by a geriatrician and a social worker. This study will compare the ENACT Group Visit intervention to mailed advance care planning materials.
Detailed description
This pilot feasibility randomized controlled study will determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the ENACT Group Visit intervention compared to a comparison arm. The ENACT Group Visit intervention aims to engage patients in an interactive discussion of key ACP concepts and support patient-initiated ACP actions (i.e. choosing decision-maker(s), deciding on preferences during serious illness, discussing preferences with decision-makers and healthcare providers, and documenting advance directives). The group visits involve two 2-hour sessions, one month apart, facilitated by a geriatrician and a social worker. The ENACT Group Visit is based on an intervention manual that guides the structure, facilitator considerations, session format, and documentation and billing details. The discussions include sharing experiences related to ACP, considering values related to serious illness, choosing a surrogate decision-maker(s), flexibility in decision making, and having conversations with decision-makers and healthcare providers. The facilitators support an interactive discussion that promotes opportunities for patients to learn from others' experiences.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALENACT group visit
Participation in two 2 hour group visits about advance care planning.
BEHAVIORALMailed Resources
Participants will receive advance care planning resources in the mail with instructions to follow up with their primary care provider.
Sponsors
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
University of Colorado, Denver
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Randomized Controlled Trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Patient Participants: Inclusion Criteria: * 70 or older * At least one clinic visit in past year * No advanced care planning (ACP) document in electronic health record based on a clinic-level, population-based report * Preferred language English for UCHealth clinics or preferred language English or Spanish for Denver Health clinic
Exclusion criteria
* Inability to demonstrate informed consent * Does not have ready access to a telephone * Inability to travel to clinic * Moving out of area in 6 months * Inability to participate in group visits due to hearing impairment as determined by clinic and/or study staff * A household member (same address) is already enrolled Caregivers Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 and older * Preferred language English for UCHealth clinics or preferred language English or Spanish for Denver Health clinic * Patient with potential cognitive impairment consented to participate in study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants with New Advanced Care Planning (ACP) documentation in their electronic health record at 6 Months | 6 months | Number of Participants with New Advanced Care Planning (ACP) documentation in the electronic health record inclusive of advance directives (i.e., easy-to-read advance directive, medical durable power of attorney forms, living wills), and medical orders (POLST forms or CPR directives. If an advanced care planning document is completed and in patient's electronic health record, the participant will be counted as having a New ACP. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Measure of readiness for ACP | Baseline, 6 months | Patient readiness for Advanced Care Planning (ACP) will be measured via the Advanced Care Planning (ACP) Engagement Survey. The 4-item ACP Engagement Survey assesses ACP readiness for signing papers for a decision maker; talking with a decision maker; talking with the doctor about future care; and signing papers about future care. Possible scores range from Possible scores for each item range from 1-5 and total scores range from 4-20, with higher indicating more planning readiness and a better outcome. |
| Measure of decision self-efficacy | Baseline, 6 months | The 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more decision self-efficacy and a better outcome. |
| The Quality of Communication (QOC) | Baseline, 6 months | Quality of Communication (QOC) Questionnaire is a 13-item validated measure of the overall quality of end-of-life communication. Possible scores are averaged and range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. |
| Composite of advanced care planning documentation | Baseline, 6 months | Clinician documentation of ACP (preferences for future medical care) in electronic health record will be measured using a standardized and double-adjudicated chart review audit process. The number of participants with clinician-documented ACP present in their electronic health records will be reported. Documentation of ACP that is added to the record as part of the ENACT group visits will be excluded. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Retention | 6 Months | Percent of individuals who complete the intervention and the 6 month follow up |
| Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) scores | Baseline, 6 months | The T-MoCA measures cognitive impairment in adults via a questionnaire conducted over the phone. Possible scores range from 0 to 22, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome. |
| Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Global Health Scores | Baseline, 6 months | The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Global Health score measures patient reported measures of health. Scores are converted to a T score so that the average respondent score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10 points, with scores of higher than 50 indicating better than average outcomes, and scores of lower than 50 indicating worse than average outcomes. |
| Percent of Recruitment (Reach) | From date of pre-screening until the date of participants' decision to enroll in study or not, up to 3 months | Percent of individuals who participate of eligible patients, by clinic-based screening |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed