Skip to content

Targeting Investigation and Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

Targeting Investigation and Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction (TARGET-Type 2): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05419583
Acronym
TARGET-Type 2
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-06-15
Start date
2022-11-14
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction Type 2

Keywords

Type 2 myocardial infarction, Randomised controlled trial, Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, Coronary artery disease, Left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Brief summary

Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is common and associated with poor clinical outcomes, with as many as one in ten experiencing recurrent MI within one year, and only one in three alive at five years. Recent prospective data demonstrates two-thirds of patients with type 2 MI have underlying coronary artery disease and one-third have left ventricular systolic impairment. Importantly, this is previously unrecognised in over half of all patients, suggesting there may be opportunities to identify and treat these underlying conditions to modify clinical outcomes. The investigators will undertake a pilot randomised controlled trial in which patients will be randomised to standard care or a complex intervention involving detailed cardiology assessment for the likelihood of coronary disease or left ventricular impairment, followed by targeted investigation and treatment where underlying disease is identified. This study will inform the design and delivery of a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial powered for clinical outcomes.

Detailed description

TARGET-Type 2 is the pilot phase of a prospective, randomised, open label with blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE) parallel group, event driven, multicentre trial, assessing the impact of a complex intervention in patients hospitalised with type 2 myocardial infarction. Patients will be recruited from the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (tertiary cardiac referral centre) and the Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy (district general hospital). The study aims to recruit 60 patients with type 2 myocardial infarction who will be randomised 1:1 to standard care or the complex intervention. Potential participants will be identified throughout the hospital, including the Emergency Department (ED), Acute Medical Unit (AMU) and all inpatient wards whilst in hospital and using electronic medical records after discharge. Potential participants who are not approached in hospital (e.g., as they attend out of hours or due to the lack of availability of the study team) will be identified using electronic medical records or through referral from the clinical team and contacted by phone by the research team to invite them to take part in the study. The trial will be integrated into routine clinical care at participating sites. A pre-screening log will be kept of patients who meet the inclusion criteria and are subsequently found to be ineligible or not recruited. Following consent and completion of baseline assessments patients who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria and are eligible will be randomised into the study, using a web-based computer-generated randomisation process. Patients will be randomised 1:1 ratio to either standard care or the complex intervention. Randomisation will be stratified based on the presence of 1) known coronary artery disease and 2) known left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Once randomised, a letter will be sent to the participant's General Practitioner (GP) to inform them of their involvement in the study and treatment allocation. Study participants who are randomised to usual care will not have any additional study visits. Those randomised to the complex intervention may be invited for further investigations to guide additional treatment and invited for follow up clinic visits. Proposed Complex Intervention: A structured management plan for doctors to guide their (a) risk assessment, (b) targeted investigation and (c) secondary preventative therapy delivered after consultation with a cardiologist. All investigations and treatments recommended are established practice in national and international clinical guidelines for patients with coronary artery disease or LV impairment due to type 1 MI. The cardiologist will estimate if the pre-test probability of coronary artery disease or LV impairment is low, intermediate, or high. This assessment will be based on symptoms, cardiovascular risk factors, previous medical history, and an evaluation of the presenting illness and initial routine investigations including a physical examination, routine blood tests, the 12-lead ECG and chest x-ray. Where the probability of coronary disease or LV impairment is low, further investigation may not be indicated. Where the probability of coronary artery disease is intermediate, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may be recommended. CCTA will be performed according to previously published methodology. Patients with a heart rate exceeding 65 beats/min will receive oral beta-blockade (50 or 100 mg metoprolol) 1 hour before computed tomography. Additional intravenous beta blockers will be given depending on heart rate at the time of imaging. All patients will receive sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (300 μg) immediately prior to dual cardiac and respiratory-gated computed tomography imaging of the coronary arteries. The investigators will quantify total plaque burden using CT calcium scoring. A bolus of 80-100 mL of contrast (400 mg/mL; Iomeron, Bracco, Milan, Italy) will be injected intravenously at 5 mL/s. CT angiography will be evaluated jointly by a Radiologist and a Cardiologist with suitable training to determine the extent of coronary atherosclerosis. In select cases, where the probability of obstructive coronary disease is considered high or if the patient has ongoing symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, invasive coronary angiography may be recommended. Where invasive coronary angiography is recommended this will be performed via the femoral or radial artery with 6F arterial catheters. Where coronary artery disease is known or highly likely, no further investigations may be required unless there is clinical suspicion of worsening disease severity. Where the probability of LV impairment is intermediate or high, a transthoracic echocardiogram will be recommended. Standard transthoracic echocardiography will be undertaken in accordance with guidance from the British Society of Echocardiography for 'full examination'. In selected patients where there is a suspicion of underlying cardiomyopathy or recent type 1 MI based on abnormal findings on echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and coronary imaging if not already performed will be considered to identify areas of scar or to clarify the final diagnosis in line with usual recommendations for clinical practice. It is intended that where possible, investigations will be completed within thirty days of randomisation. The investigators will identify if there is coronary heart disease or left ventricular impairment in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. Our treatment strategy will involve the use of therapies approved by clinical guidelines for use in standard clinical practice because of proven benefit for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with anti-platelet agents, such as aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors, and lipid lowering drugs, such as statins. In patients who undergo invasive coronary angiography, if there is evidence of recent plaque rupture or where there are high risk features, revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention will be considered if in the patient's best interests, in line with clinical practice guidelines. Revascularisation will also be considered in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease who report limiting anginal symptoms despite medical therapy. This intervention may be considered at the first procedure where patients are established on treatment, or during follow up review. In patients with evidence of left ventricular impairment, additional therapies including beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or aldosterone/neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and SGLT-2 inhibitors will be considered and recommended in line with guideline recommendations. All drugs have a class I recommendation from the European Society of Cardiology in patients with left ventricular impairment. Decision making on treatment recommendations will be patient centred, and whilst recommendations will be made by the study team all prescriptions will issued by the usual care team after consideration. Patients found to have obstructive coronary artery disease, moderate to severe LV impairment, evidence of cardiomyopathy or at least moderate valvular heart disease will be offered a cardiology outpatient clinic appointment for further assessment. A structured template recording a clinical summary, cause of type 2 MI, assessment, investigation and treatment recommendations will be recorded on the electronic patient record for the usual care team. A letter will be sent to the GP informing them of participation in the study, treatment allocation, the results of investigations and recommended treatments. In those who provide consent, blood samples will be obtained to facilitate biomarker evaluation and risk stratification in future studies As recruitment to the TARGET-Type 2 feasibility study begins, recruitment processes will be investigated using qualitative research methods to identify specific facilitators or barriers to recruitment. a purposive sample of patients across a range of ages, trial participation status and study site will also be invited to consent to an interview study. Interviews will explore reasons for participation and non-participation, and the acceptability of study procedures. Patients can choose whether to take part in either or both parts of the study. Interviews with patients will explore views on the presentation of trial information, understanding of study processes (e.g. randomisation), the acceptability of study interventions and reasons underlying decisions to consent or decline to participate. If screening logs identify clinician hesitation to randomise their patient as a barrier to recruitment, clinicians will be invited to participate in an interview to explore the reasons underpinning this. The interview topic guide will explore views about the trial importance, relevance and interventions from a clinician's point of view, and how recruitment operates in practice.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCoronary computed tomography angiography

CT scan of the heart arteries

Invasive coronary angiography via the radial or femoral approach

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTransthoracic echocardiography

Ultrasound scan of the heart

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCardiac MRI scan

An MRI scan to assess the heart structure and function

DRUGAntiplatelet Drug (Aspirin or Statin)

Antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease

DRUGAnticoagulants (Apixaban, Edoxaban, Rivaroxoban, Warfarin)

Anticoagulant therapy if atrial fibrillation identified (DOAC or Warfarin)

DRUGGuideline directed heart failure therapy

Use of guideline approved heart failure treatments (ACE-inhibitor / angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) / ARB and neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, beta blocker, SGLT-2 inhibitor, diuretic therapy)

Statins will be recommended for patients with coronary plaque disease or hypercholesterolaemia

Sponsors

Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Edinburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction, defined as: i. Symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, or signs of myocardial ischaemia on 12-lead electrocardiogram (≥0.5mm ST segment depression in any two contiguous leads or new regional T wave inversion) ii. A clinically significant change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentration with at least one value above the 99th centile upper reference limit, or a single measurement if considered significantly elevated iii. Documented evidence of myocardial oxygen supply (anaemia, hypoxia, hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, arrhythmia) or demand (hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, valvular heart disease) imbalance.

Exclusion criteria

i. Patients under 30 years who are less likely to benefit from cardiac imaging ii. Inability to give informed consent iii. Patients on renal replacement therapy or with eGFR \<30ml/min iv. Patients with advanced frailty (based on Clinical Frailty Score ≥7) v. Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding vi. Patients with ST-segment elevation on 12-lead electrocardiogram vii. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction viii. Patients who have had diagnostic imaging confirming coronary vasospasm, embolism or spontaneous coronary artery dissection has caused type 2 myocardial infarction ix. Previous randomization into TARGET-Type 2 pilot study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trial process outcomes: eligibility, approach, consent and randomisation90 daysThe proportion of patients who are eligible, approached, consented and randomised

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment rate30 days and 90 daysRate per month and overall
Adherence to recommended investigation90 daysDetermined as the proportion of patients who received recommended investigation
Adherence to recommended treatment90 daysDetermined as the proportion of patients who received recommended treatment
Proportion of patients with changes in prescription of secondary prevention therapy90 daysDefined as initiation, intensification or cessation of cardiac medication including aspirin, clopidogrel, statin, bisoprolol or ACE-inhibitor and others as defined in data dictionary.
Frequency of investigation and treatment90 daysProportion of patients who undergo routine cardiac investigation (echocardiography, invasive coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, CT coronary angiography, cardiac MRI) in the standard care arm per month
Change in classification of myocardial infarction90 daysProportion of patients in whom the classification of myocardial infarction changes after study intervention
Quantity of missing dataBaseline and 90 days

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of major bleeding90 daysBleeding Academic Research Consortium \[BARC\] 3-5
Rate of cardiac death90 daysDefined as death resulting from an acute myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, or death due to heart failure.
Rate of non-cardiovascular death90 daysDefined as death arising from any other cause not listed under cardiovascular death
Rate of hospitalisation with heart failure90 days
Rate of myocardial infarction90 daysAs per the Fourth Universal Definition
Rate of all-cause death90 days
Rate of cardiovascular death90 daysDefined as death resulting from an acute myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure, death due to stroke, death due to haemorrhage, and death due to other cardiovascular causes
Rate of unscheduled coronary revascularization90 days

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026