Skip to content

Study of Different Interventions to Reduce Bruising Following CCH-Aaes Treatment for Cellulite of the Buttocks

APHRODITE-1: A Phase 2, Open Label, Self-Controlled Study of Different Interventions to Reduce Bruising Following CCH-Aaes Treatment for Cellulite of the Buttocks in Adult Females

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05419505
Acronym
APHRODITE
Enrollment
91
Registered
2022-06-15
Start date
2022-06-15
Completion date
2023-06-21
Last updated
2025-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edematous Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy, Cellulite

Keywords

Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum, collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes

Brief summary

The study will evaluate the effect of different doses, strengths (concentrations), diluent additives, depths of injection, and methods of injection on the severity of bruising potentially induced by QWO (collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes \[CCH-aaes\]).

Detailed description

The study will comprise a Screening Period (28 days), Treatment Period (90 days), and Follow-up Period (90 days). Participants will receive CCH-aaes in different doses, concentrations, diluent additives, depths of injection, and methods of injection in a split buttock arrangement, with the right buttock serving as the control, and the left buttock (investigational side) receiving a study intervention.

Interventions

Administered by subcutaneous injection.

DRUGAntifibrinolytic Agent

Self-administered by participants enrolled in Cohort 7.

Sponsors

Endo Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Have a body mass index of 18 to \<32 kilograms (kg)/meter (m)\^2 and intends to maintain stable body weight during the study. * Have both buttocks with moderate or severe cellulite as reported by the investigator using the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). * Have a Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS) Total Score of ≤12. * Has a Fitzpatrick Skin Type of I-IV * Be willing to apply sunscreen to the treatment areas before each exposure to the sun for the duration of participation in the study. * Be willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Has systemic conditions (coagulation disorders, skin pigmentation disorders, malignancy, keloidal scarring, abnormal wound healing) that restricts study participation. * Is pregnant and/or is breast-feeding or plans to become pregnant and/or to breast-feed during the course of the study. * Has any local (in the areas to be treated) conditions (thrombosis, post-thrombosis syndrome, vascular disorder, inflammation, active infection, active cutaneous alteration, tattoo or mole) that restricts study participation. * Requires antiplatelet medication, anticoagulants, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during the study. * Any medications, supplements, or foods that have, or have been reported to have anticoagulant effects within 14 days of treatment. * Has received treatment with investigational treatment within 30 days before treatment. * Has used or intends to use any of the local applications, therapies, injections, or procedures for the treatment of cellulite on either buttock that would restrict study participation. * Intends to initiate an intensive sport or exercise program or intensive weight reduction program during the study. * Intends to engage in strenuous activity within 48 hours of study intervention administration. * Has recently tanned or intends to tan (outdoors or indoors) during the study. * Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergy to collagenase or any other excipient of CCH. * Has any condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, might indicate the participant to be unsuitable for the study. * Has participated in a previous investigational study of CCH or received any collagenase treatments at any time prior to treatment in this study for the treatment of cellulite of the buttocks. In addition to the applicable aforementioned

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection3 to 5 days after initial CCH-aaes injection of left buttock (test) and right buttock (control)The investigator assessed the severity of bruising using the IABSS, The IABSS is a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with 0 indicating no bruising or almost none, and 4 indicating very severe bruising. Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. The investigator compared the bruising of the left (test) buttock to the right (control) buttock. Responders were participants whose left buttock/test side demonstrated at least a 1-level lower IABSS score versus the right buttock/control side. Percentages are based on the number of participants with an assessment at specified timepoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 1, 2, 3, and 4 after CCH-aaes injection of left buttock (test) and right buttock (control)The investigator assessed the severity of bruising using the IABSS, The IABSS is a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with 0 indicating no bruising or almost none, and 4 indicating very severe bruising. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. The investigator compared the bruising of the left buttock (test) to the right (control) buttock. Responders were participants whose left buttock/test side at Visit A demonstrated at least a 1-level lower IABSS score versus the right buttock/control side at Visit B, where Visit A and B could either be the same or different. Follow-up after first injection is presented: Follow-up 1 is 1 to 2 days after injection visit, Follow-up 2 is 3 to 5 days after injection visit, Follow-up 3 is 6 to 9 days after injection visit, and Follow-up 4 is 10 to 14 days after injection visit. Percentages are based on the number of participants with an assessment at specified timepoint.
Percentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 and Day 43 for Cohorts 1 to 5, Day 43 for Cohort 6, Day 22, Day 43, and Day 64 for Cohort 7, and Day 90, Day 135, and Day 180 for all cohortsThe investigator determined the degree of improvement of each buttock by comparing treated cellulite dimples from the Day 1 pre-treatment (Baseline) digital image of each buttock to the treated dimples observed in a live assessment. The investigator determined the degree of improvement of each buttock with the I-GAIS, which uses a 7-point scale ranging from +3 (very much improved) to -3 (very much worse). A higher score indicated a better outcome. The investigator compared the bruising of the left (test) buttock to the right (control) buttock. A 1-level I-GAIS responder was defined as any participant with an improved (+1, +2 or +3) score on the I-GAIS at an analysis visit for that treatment area. Percentages are based on the number of participants with an assessment at specified timepoint.
Percentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsFrom Day 1 (after dose) through Day 180Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any adverse events (AEs) that occur or worsen (increase in severity) on the same day or after the study intervention administration on Day 1. Percent of participants with TEAEs of injection site reactions are presented by left buttock (test) and right buttock (control). A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Ninety-one participants were enrolled in this split-person study to compare different collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes (CCH-aaes) treatment regimens. Participants were administered study intervention in a split-buttock arrangement, with each participant's right buttock serving as the control to their assigned intervention administered to the left buttock (test).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose Evaluation
Participants left buttock (test) received CCH-aaes injection using half the labeled dose (0.42 milligrams \[mg\]) but maintaining the labeled concentration (0.23 mg/milliliters \[mL\]). Participants right buttock (control) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL)
22
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration Evaluation
Participants left buttock (test) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) but using an approximate 5-fold dilution (0.05 mg/mL) of the labeled concentration (0.23 mg/mL). Participants right buttock (control) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL).
14
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth Evaluation
Participants left buttock (test) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL) but with an injection depth of one-quarter inch. Participants right buttock (control) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL) with labeled injection depth of one-half inch.
5
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method Evaluation
Participants left buttock (test) received CCH-aaes injection using an approximate 2.5-fold dilution of the labeled concentration (0.09 mg/mL) but administering only a single aliquot at one-quarter-inch depth per injection administered at up to 30 injections. Participants right buttock (control) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL) but administering only a single aliquot at one-quarter-inch depth per injection administered at up to 12 injections.
7
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive Evaluation
Participants left buttock (test) received CCH-aaes injection using half the labeled dose (0.42 mg) with diluent additive. Participants right buttock (control) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL).
10
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule Evaluation
Participants left buttock (test) received CCH-aaes injection using one-quarter of the labeled dose (0.21 mg) at one-half the labeled concentration (0.12 mg/mL). Treatment sessions were administered 6 weeks apart. Participants right buttock (control) received CCH-aaes injection using one-half the labeled dose (0.42 mg) but maintaining the labeled concentration (0.23 mg/mL). Treatment sessions were administered 6 weeks apart.
19
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic Agent
Participants left buttock (test) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL) with an antifibrinolytic agent treatment regimen. Participants right buttock (control) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL).
7
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic Agent
Participants left buttock (test) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL) with an antifibrinolytic agent treatment regimen. Participants right buttock (control) received CCH-aaes injection using the labeled dose (0.84 mg) and concentration (0.23 mg/mL).
7
Total91

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyAdverse Event00010000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21001201
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12000010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationCohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationCohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationCohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationCohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationCohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationCohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentCohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentTotal
Age, Continuous43.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.698
44.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.125
44.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.503
34.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.699
46.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.179
47.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.225
37.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.967
38.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.549
43.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.998
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
18 Participants14 Participants5 Participants7 Participants9 Participants18 Participants6 Participants7 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants14 Participants5 Participants7 Participants10 Participants19 Participants7 Participants7 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
EG014
affected / at risk
EG015
affected / at risk
EG016
affected / at risk
EG017
affected / at risk
EG018
affected / at risk
EG019
affected / at risk
EG020
affected / at risk
EG021
affected / at risk
EG022
affected / at risk
EG023
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 220 / 140 / 50 / 70 / 100 / 190 / 70 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 2222 / 2213 / 1413 / 145 / 55 / 57 / 77 / 710 / 1010 / 1019 / 1919 / 197 / 76 / 77 / 77 / 74 / 220 / 143 / 50 / 70 / 104 / 190 / 72 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 220 / 140 / 50 / 70 / 100 / 190 / 70 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection

The investigator assessed the severity of bruising using the IABSS, The IABSS is a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with 0 indicating no bruising or almost none, and 4 indicating very severe bruising. Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. The investigator compared the bruising of the left (test) buttock to the right (control) buttock. Responders were participants whose left buttock/test side demonstrated at least a 1-level lower IABSS score versus the right buttock/control side. Percentages are based on the number of participants with an assessment at specified timepoint.

Time frame: 3 to 5 days after initial CCH-aaes injection of left buttock (test) and right buttock (control)

Population: All participants who received at least 1 injection of CCH-aaes and who had at least 1 valid IABSS assessment after an injection of CCH-aaes at specified timepoint. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection90.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection33.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection44.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection63.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection33.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score 3 to 5 Days After Initial CCH-aaes Injection, as Assessed by the Investigator Assessment of Bruising Severity Scale (IABSS) After Initial CCH-aaes Injection33.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSS

The investigator assessed the severity of bruising using the IABSS, The IABSS is a 5-point scale ranging from 0-4, with 0 indicating no bruising or almost none, and 4 indicating very severe bruising. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. The investigator compared the bruising of the left buttock (test) to the right (control) buttock. Responders were participants whose left buttock/test side at Visit A demonstrated at least a 1-level lower IABSS score versus the right buttock/control side at Visit B, where Visit A and B could either be the same or different. Follow-up after first injection is presented: Follow-up 1 is 1 to 2 days after injection visit, Follow-up 2 is 3 to 5 days after injection visit, Follow-up 3 is 6 to 9 days after injection visit, and Follow-up 4 is 10 to 14 days after injection visit. Percentages are based on the number of participants with an assessment at specified timepoint.

Time frame: Follow-up 1, 2, 3, and 4 after CCH-aaes injection of left buttock (test) and right buttock (control)

Population: All participants who received at least 1 injection of CCH-aaes and who had at least 1 valid IABSS assessment after an injection of CCH-aaes at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 181.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 290.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 340.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 413.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 418.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 225.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 115.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 338.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 10 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 40 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 220.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 340.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 142.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 233.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 328.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 414.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 410.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 310.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 244.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 140.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 421.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 331.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 263.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 144.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 416.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 116.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 340.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 233.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 233.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 342.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 471.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least 1-Level Lower Score, as Assessed by the IABSSFollow-up 142.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes Injection

The investigator determined the degree of improvement of each buttock by comparing treated cellulite dimples from the Day 1 pre-treatment (Baseline) digital image of each buttock to the treated dimples observed in a live assessment. The investigator determined the degree of improvement of each buttock with the I-GAIS, which uses a 7-point scale ranging from +3 (very much improved) to -3 (very much worse). A higher score indicated a better outcome. The investigator compared the bruising of the left (test) buttock to the right (control) buttock. A 1-level I-GAIS responder was defined as any participant with an improved (+1, +2 or +3) score on the I-GAIS at an analysis visit for that treatment area. Percentages are based on the number of participants with an assessment at specified timepoint.

Time frame: Day 22 and Day 43 for Cohorts 1 to 5, Day 43 for Cohort 6, Day 22, Day 43, and Day 64 for Cohort 7, and Day 90, Day 135, and Day 180 for all cohorts

Population: All participants who received at least 1 injection of CCH-aaes and who had at least 1 valid assessment at a treatment area after an injection of CCH-aaes.~For Cohort 7a, on Day 22, I-GAIS was only assessed for the investigational buttock (left buttock) and for Cohort 7b, on Day 22, I-GAIS was only assessed for the control buttock (right buttock).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Right Buttock (Control)36.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Left Buttock (Test)71.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Left Buttock (Test)42.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)38.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)47.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Right Buttock (Control)76.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)36.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Right Buttock (Control)57.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Left Buttock (Test)36.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)47.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)90.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)80.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Left Buttock (Test)84.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Right Buttock (Control)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Left Buttock (Test)58.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Right Buttock (Control)76.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Right Buttock (Control)81.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)81.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)70.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Left Buttock (Test)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Left Buttock (Test)50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)83.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Right Buttock (Control)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Left Buttock (Test)83.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Right Buttock (Control)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Left Buttock (Test)11.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Right Buttock (Control)11.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Right Buttock (Control)40.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Left Buttock (Test)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Right Buttock (Control)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Left Buttock (Test)40.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)44.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)44.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)22.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)22.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)38.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)27.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)22.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Right Buttock (Control)50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Left Buttock (Test)17.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)33.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Left Buttock (Test)44.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Right Buttock (Control)41.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Right Buttock (Control)40.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)71.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Right Buttock (Control)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Left Buttock (Test)85.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)85.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Left Buttock (Test)66.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)83.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 64 Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 64 Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 22 Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 43 Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 64 Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 64 Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Left Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 90 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 135 (Follow-up) Right Buttock (Control)83.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Left Buttock (Test)83.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With at Least +1 or Higher Score on the Investigator-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (I-GAIS) After CCH-aaes InjectionDay 180 (End of Study) Right Buttock (Control)83.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Injection Site Reactions

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any adverse events (AEs) that occur or worsen (increase in severity) on the same day or after the study intervention administration on Day 1. Percent of participants with TEAEs of injection site reactions are presented by left buttock (test) and right buttock (control). A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: From Day 1 (after dose) through Day 180

Population: All participants who received at least 1 injection of CCH-aaes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsRight Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: CCH-aaes Dose EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsLeft Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsLeft Buttock (Test)92.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: CCH-aaes Concentration EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsRight Buttock (Control)92.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsRight Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: CCH-aaes Injection Depth EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsLeft Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsLeft Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: CCH-aaes Injection Method EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsRight Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsRight Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: CCH-aaes and Diluent Additive EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsLeft Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsRight Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 6: CCH-aaes Dose, Concentration, and Treatment Schedule EvaluationPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsLeft Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsLeft Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7a: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsRight Buttock (Control)85.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsRight Buttock (Control)100 percentage of participants
Cohort 7b: CCH-aaes and Antifibrinolytic AgentPercentage of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsLeft Buttock (Test)100 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026