Skip to content

Retrospective Study of Implants With Peri-implantitis Surgically Treated Using Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD)

Retrospective Study of Implants With Peri-implantitis Surgically Treated Using Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05419102
Enrollment
34
Registered
2022-06-15
Start date
2022-04-01
Completion date
2022-06-06
Last updated
2022-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Determination of Beneficial Effect of Using Enamel Matrix Derivative During Implant Treatment

Keywords

dental implant, peri-implantitis, enamel matrix derivative

Brief summary

The existing records of a private practice limited to the practice of periodontology were reviewed to locate patients who had been diagnosed with peri-implantitis (failing dental implant) and had been surgically treated utilizing enamel matrix derivative (Commercially available FDA product Emdogain sold by Straumann USA). Various clinical factors were gathered from the existing records. Some of the factors recorded were: retention of the implant, presence of bleeding, presence of further damage, and presence of inflammation. All patients had signed an informed consent for treatment and the anonymous use of their data for research purposes. All HIPA requirements were followed.

Detailed description

See brief summary.

Interventions

PROCEDUREperi-implantitis surgery with enamel matrix derivative

surgical procedures around dental implants with peri-implantits to remove infectious material and apply enamel matrix derivative to the implant.

Sponsors

North Dallas Dental Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all adult patients of record who presented with existing peri-implantitis that was clinically deemed treatable (the implant was not considered hopeless.)

Exclusion criteria

* none except for routine medical contraindications for periodontal surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
retention of the implant0.71 to 6.4 yearsDetermine if the implant was still present at the time of reevaluation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
record the clinical condition of the implant at the time of reevaluation0.71 to 6.4 yearsMultiple standard measurements of the clinical condition of the implant were recorded at the time of reevaluation

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026