Age Related Hearing Loss, Aging
Conditions
Keywords
Cognitive training, Executive function, Aging, Dual-task walking, Near-infrared spectroscopy, Hearing loss, Middle age, Mobility
Brief summary
The proposed study is designed to evaluate the effect of at-home executive function training on cognition and mobility in older adults with age-related hearing loss (ARHL), older adults with normal hearing, and middle-aged adults.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALExecutive function (EF) training
EF training will involve at-home computer- or tablet based training to improve several EF processes, including divided attention, response inhibition, switching, and working memory updating. Training session duration = 30 min x 3 session/week.
Sponsors
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Concordia University, Montreal
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Masking description
The investigator will be blinded to group assignment.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Proficient in English (learned before age 5), can ambulate ≥ 10 meters independently, absence of cognitive impairment (neuropsychological test results in the average range compared to age norms), normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity (ETDRS), availability of a home computer or tablet with internet connection.
Exclusion criteria
* Reported major depression, substance abuse or significant psychiatric disorder, uncorrected visual impairment, vestibular impairment, Parkinson's disease or other neurological disorder or sequelae, clinically significant musculoskeletal disorders, diseases affecting the ear, or damage to the ear (e.g., occupational noise), onset of hearing loss prior to adulthood.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-training Change in auditory 2-back accuracy | baseline | Auditory 2-back performance will be assessed under single- and dual-task conditions (i.e., while the participant is standing or simultaneously walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace). The numbers for the task will be played through binaural speakers, and the decibel level will be individualized for each participant depending on hearing ability. Participants will be required to make a button response indicating whether the number they heard was the same or different from the number they heard two previously. Accuracy (percent correct) will be recorded. Half the participants will be given this assessment. See Outcome 5, Multi-talker, for other half. |
| Post-training Change in auditory 2-back accuracy | after 12 weeks | Auditory 2-back performance will be assessed under single- and dual-task conditions (i.e., while the participant is standing or simultaneously walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace). The numbers for the task will be played through binaural speakers, and the decibel level will be individualized for each participant depending on hearing ability. Participants will be required to make a button response indicating whether the number they heard was the same or different from the number they heard two previously. Accuracy (percent correct) will be recorded. Half the participants will be given this assessment. See Outcome 6, Multi-talker, for other half. |
| Pre-training Change in auditory 2-back reaction time | baseline | Auditory 2-back performance will be assessed under single- and dual-task conditions (i.e., while the participant is standing or simultaneously walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace). The numbers for the task will be played through binaural speakers, and the decibel level will be individualized for each participant depending on hearing ability. Participants will be required to make a button response indicating whether the number they heard was the same or different from the number they heard two previously. Reaction time (msec) will be recorded. Half the participants will be given this assessment. See Outcome 5, Multi-talker, for other half. |
| Post-training Change in auditory 2-back reaction time | after 12 weeks | Auditory 2-back performance will be assessed under single- and dual-task conditions (i.e., while the participant is standing or simultaneously walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace). The numbers for the task will be played through binaural speakers, and the decibel level will be individualized for each participant depending on hearing ability. Participants will be required to make a button response indicating whether the number they heard was the same or different from the number they heard two previously. Reaction time (msec) will be recorded. Half the participants will be given this assessment. See Outcome 6, Multi-talker, for other half. |
| Pre-training Multi-Talker word perception (accuracy) | baseline | We will use the multi-talker spatial listening task for the other half of the participants, in which a presented text cue indicates which of three simultaneously presented, but spatially distributed spoken sentences to report. Traffic noise will be included to more closely simulate real- world conditions. The signal-to-noise ratio will be held constant across participants, with signal intensity set according to individual average hearing thresholds. |
| Post-training Multi-Talker word perception (accuracy) | after 12 weeks | We will use the multi-talker spatial listening task for the other half of the participants, in which a presented text cue indicates which of three simultaneously presented, but spatially distributed spoken sentences to report. Traffic noise will be included to more closely simulate real- world conditions. The signal-to-noise ratio will be held constant across participants, with signal intensity set according to individual average hearing thresholds. |
| Pre-training Change in stride time (mean, standard deviation [SD] of stride time) | baseline | Stride time will be assessed under single- and dual-task conditions (i.e., walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace or while simultaneously completing the auditory 2-back task). The spatio-temporal characteristics of gait will be measured by foot pressure sensors worn on the base of the participants' shoes, with one sensor placed beneath the heel and the second sensor placed beneath the toe. The time between successive toe or heel strikes will be recorded (sec) and averaged across the trials. Those participants being assessed with Outcome 5 will perform the same walking task but in a simulated street-crossing environment. |
| Post-training Change in stride time (mean, standard deviation [SD] of stride time) | after 12 weeks | Stride time will be assessed under single- and dual-task conditions (i.e., walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace or while simultaneously completing the auditory 2-back task). The spatio-temporal characteristics of gait will be measured by foot pressure sensors worn on the base of the participants' shoes, with one sensor placed beneath the heel and the second sensor placed beneath the toe. The time between successive toe or heel strikes will be recorded (sec) and averaged across the trials. Those participants being assessed with Outcome 6 will perform the same walking task but in a simulated street-crossing environment. |
| Pre-training Change in stride time variability (mean, standard deviation [SD] of stride time) | baseline | Stride time variability will be assessed under single- and dual-task conditions (i.e., walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace or while simultaneously completing the auditory 2-back task). The spatio-temporal characteristics of gait will be measured by foot pressure sensors worn on the base of the participants' shoes, with one sensor placed beneath the heel and the second sensor placed beneath the toe. The time between successive toe or heel strikes will be recorded (sec) and the standard deviation will be taken to derive a measure of stride time variability. Those participants being assessed with Outcome 5 will perform the same walking task but in a simulated street-crossing environment. |
| Post-training Change in stride time variability (mean, standard deviation [SD] of stride time) | after 12 weeks | Stride time variability will be assessed under single- and dual-task conditions (i.e., walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace or while simultaneously completing the auditory 2-back task). The spatio-temporal characteristics of gait will be measured by foot pressure sensors worn on the base of the participants' shoes, with one sensor placed beneath the heel and the second sensor placed beneath the toe. The time between successive toe or heel strikes will be recorded (sec) and the standard deviation will be taken to derive a measure of stride time variability. Those participants being assessed with Outcome 6 will perform the same walking task but in a simulated street-crossing environment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-training WAIS-IV Digit span | baseline | Neuropsychological test to evaluate short-term memory. Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS; Wechsler, 2008). Scored based on highest span length correctly completed. |
| Post-training WAIS-IV Digit span | after 12 weeks | Neuropsychological test to evaluate short-term memory. Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS; Wechsler, 2008). Scored based on highest span length correctly completed. |
| Pre-training Subjective listening self efficacy | baseline | Listening self-efficacy questionnaire (LSEQ: Smith, Pichora-Fuller, Watts, & La More, 2011, Int J Audiol). Asks questions about one's self-rated ability to understand conversation in a variety of contexts, without the use of hearing aids, self-rated self-efficacy (0-100%). Internal consistency (Chronbach's α) = .96 (Smith et al., 2011). |
| Post-training Subjective listening self efficacy | after 12 weeks | Listening self-efficacy questionnaire (LSEQ: Smith, Pichora-Fuller, Watts, & La More, 2011, Int J Audiol). Asks questions about one's self-rated ability to understand conversation in a variety of contexts, without the use of hearing aids. Internal consistency (Chronbach's α) = .96 (Smith et al., 2011). |
| Pre-training Subjective balance confidence | baseline | ABC Balance Confidence Questionnaire (Powell & Myers, 1995, J Geront: MedSci). Sixteen-item questionnaire concerning self-rated confidence (0-100%) balancing in different physical activities and contexts. |
| Post-training Subjective balance confidence | after 12 weeks | ABC Balance Confidence Questionnaire (Powell & Myers, 1995, J Geront: MedSci). Sixteen-item questionnaire concerning self-rated confidence (0-100%) balancing in different physical activities and contexts. |
| Pre-training Mobility functioning as assessed by the Mini BESTest | baseline | The Mini BESTest is comprised of four sub-scales to evaluate balance performance, including an anticipatory sub-scale (e.g., sit-to-stand, toe rise), a reactive postural control subscale (measures compensatory stepping when one's centre of balance is displaced in the forward, backward, or lateral position), a sensory orientation subscale (e.g., eyes closed, foam mat), and a gait subscale (e.g., walking over an obstacle). |
| Post-training Mobility functioning as assessed by the Mini BESTest | after 12 weeks | The Mini BESTest is comprised of four sub-scales to evaluate balance performance, including an anticipatory sub-scale (e.g., sit-to-stand, toe rise), a reactive postural control subscale (measures compensatory stepping when one's centre of balance is displaced in the forward, backward, or lateral position), a sensory orientation subscale (e.g., eyes closed, foam mat), and a gait subscale (e.g., walking over an obstacle). |
| Pre-training Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | baseline | Neuropsychological test to evaluate global cognitive status. Scored on 30, a score of 26 or higher is used to identify Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) however a score of 23 or higher is used in this study as this cut-off has been shown to lower false positivity. (Nasreddine et al., 2005) |
| Post-training Functional neuroimaging (fNIRS) | after 12 weeks | Portable functional near infrared spectroscopy (BRITE MKII) will be used to assess prefrontal cortex activity during the single- and dual-task walking conditions. Sixteen detectors will be placed strategically 2.8 cm away from the optodes, eight of them will be dorsal to the optodes, while the other eight will be ventral, so that each probe has four dorsal detectors and four ventral detectors. The two probes will be placed symmetrically over the lateral prefrontal cortex and the most anterior and most ventral pair of optode-detector of each probe will be placed on Fp1/Fp2. The probes were designed based on existing configurations. Of interest are relative changes in concentration of frontal oxy-hemoglobin (HbO2: measured at absorption peak of 850nm) and deoxy-hemoglobin (HbR: measured at absorption peak of 735nm) compared to the baseline rest data. |
| Pre-training Standing Balance (Path length) | baseline | Postural measures will include spatial measures (centre of pressure path length; cm) in the anterior-posterior (front and back) and medial-lateral (side-to-side) orientations. |
| Pre-training Standing Balance (Velocity) | baseline | Postural measures will include temporal measures (velocity; cm/s) in the anterior-posterior (front and back) and medial-lateral (side-to-side) orientations. |
| Pre-training Standing Balance (Variability) | baseline | Postural measures will include variability measures (root means square, standard deviation) in the anterior-posterior (front and back) and medial-lateral (side-to-side) orientations. |
| Post-training Standing Balance (Path length) | after 12 weeks | Postural measures will include spatial measures (centre of pressure path length; cm) in the anterior-posterior (front and back) and medial-lateral (side-to-side) orientations. |
| Post-training Standing Balance (Velocity) | after 12 weeks | Postural measures will include temporal measures (velocity; cm/s) in the anterior-posterior (front and back) and medial-lateral (side-to-side) orientations. |
| Post-training Standing Balance (Variability) | after 12 weeks | Postural measures will include variability measures (root means square, standard deviation) in the anterior-posterior (front and back) and medial-lateral (side-to-side) orientations. |
| Pre-training Functional neuroimaging (fNIRS) | baseline | Portable functional near infrared spectroscopy (BRITE MKII) will be used to assess prefrontal cortex activity during the single- and dual-task walking conditions. Sixteen detectors will be placed strategically 2.8 cm away from the optodes, eight of them will be dorsal to the optodes, while the other eight will be ventral, so that each probe has four dorsal detectors and four ventral detectors. The two probes will be placed symmetrically over the lateral prefrontal cortex and the most anterior and most ventral pair of optode-detector of each probe will be placed on Fp1/Fp2. The probes were designed based on existing configurations. Of interest are relative changes in concentration of frontal oxy-hemoglobin (HbO2: measured at absorption peak of 850nm) and deoxy-hemoglobin (HbR: measured at absorption peak of 735nm) compared to the baseline rest data. |
| Post-training Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | after 12 weeks | Neuropsychological test to evaluate global cognitive status. Scored on 30, a score of 26 or higher is used to identify Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) however a score of 23 or higher is used in this study as this cut-off has been shown to lower false positivity. (Nasreddine et al., 2005) |
| Pre-training WAIS-IV Digit Symbol Coding | baseline | Neuropsychological test to evaluate processing speed. Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS; Wechsler, 2008). Scored based on correct number of symbols completed in 120 seconds. |
| Post-training WAIS-IV Digit Symbol Coding | after 12 weeks | Neuropsychological test to evaluate processing speed. Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS; Wechsler, 2008). Scored based on correct number of symbols completed in 120 seconds. |
| Pre-training Trail Making Test | baseline | Neuropsychological test to evaluate processing speed and executive functioning (Reitan, 1992). In form A, participants use a pencil to connect circles on a page in ascending numerical order. In form B, participants connect circles, alternating between ascending number and letter series. Time to complete (s) is recorded per form. Difference between Forms B and A completion times provides an index of switching, updating, and is considered a measure of executive function. |
| Post-training Trail Making Test | after 12 weeks | Neuropsychological test to evaluate processing speed and executive functioning (Reitan, 1992). In form A, participants use a pencil to connect circles on a page in ascending numerical order. In form B, participants connect circles, alternating between ascending number and letter series. Time to complete (s) is recorded per form. Difference between Forms B and A completion times provides an index of switching, updating, and is considered a measure of executive function. |
| Pre-training D-KEFS Stroop | baseline | Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color-Word Interference Test (CWIT) is a neuropsychological test to evaluate processing speed and executive functioning (adapted from Delis, Kaplan, & Kramer, 2001). A modification of the Stroop task (Stroop, 1935). In the CWIT, participants are asked to complete four conditions: colour naming, reading (both discontinued after 90 seconds), inhibition, and inhibition/switching (both discontinued after 180 seconds). Number correctly completed per condition. |
| Post-training D-KEFS Stroop | after 12 weeks | Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color-Word Interference Test (CWIT) is a neuropsychological test to evaluate processing speed and executive functioning (adapted from Delis, Kaplan, & Kramer, 2001). A modification of the Stroop task (Stroop, 1935). In the CWIT, participants are asked to complete four conditions: colour naming, reading (both discontinued after 90 seconds), inhibition, and inhibition/switching (both discontinued after 180 seconds). Number correctly completed per condition. |
| Pre-training Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test | baseline | Neuropsychological test to evaluate verbal memory (RAVLT; Rey, A. (1941). Scored by: adding up to correctly recalled words for each trial to obtain immediate recall total; how many correctly recalled words after the 30-minute interval to obtain their delayed recall total; divided delayed recall total by the total words correctly recalled on the fifth (last) trial of the initial administration and multiplied by 100 to obtain their percentage retention value. |
| Post-training Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test | after 12 weeks | Neuropsychological test to evaluate verbal memory (RAVLT; Rey, A. (1941). Scored by: adding up to correctly recalled words for each trial to obtain immediate recall total; how many correctly recalled words after the 30-minute interval to obtain their delayed recall total; divided delayed recall total by the total words correctly recalled on the fifth (last) trial of the initial administration and multiplied by 100 to obtain their percentage retention value. |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed