Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Different Resin Composite Restorations

Comparative Study of Clinical Criteria of Different Resin Composite Restorations Among Lower Molars

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05418400
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-06-14
Start date
2022-08-15
Completion date
2023-11-01
Last updated
2022-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Keywords

composite resin

Brief summary

Posterior resin composite is challenging esthetic restoration. Patients seek for durable, esthetic and functional restorations in molars. one of the major problems is polymerization shrinkage. Some materials were developed to overcome the polymerization shrinkage, among them bulk fill resin composite which have been developed to reduce the shrinkage stress during polymerization and offer much greater depth of cure. This is achieved by the addition of fillers such as barium aluminum silicate filler, ytterbium trifluoride and mixed oxides. Furthermore, a prepolymerized fillers have been added with silanes to reduce shrinkage stress. so, the objective of this trial is to clinical Evaluate and compare clinical performance of bulk fill VS incremental filling technique.

Interventions

OTHERsonic fill 3 & PALFIQUE bulk flow & Neo spectra & Clear fill AP-X

dental filling materials

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

inclusion criteria of participants: * Male gender * Good oral hygiene * Only Cooperative patient * Medically free patient * Age range 18-24 inclusion criteria of the teeth: * Vital teeth with no periapical lesion or radiolucency. * Prepared cavity with no undermined enamel walls. * Functioning tooth with presence of an opposing. * Healthy periodontium.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post operative sensitivityalong one yearrestorations will be evaluated the according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS)
marginal discolorationalong one yearrestorations will be evaluated the according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS)
marginal adaptationalong one yearrestorations will be evaluated the according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS)
recurrent cariesalong one yearrestorations will be evaluated the according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026