Cerebral Palsy, Dual-tasks, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Hawthorne Effect, Kinematics
Conditions
Brief summary
It is the clinical experience of the authors that some children with cerebral palsy who walk in crouch gait show sufficient knee extension during the clinical gait analysis, but walk in considerable knee flexion when they leave the gait laboratory. Possible differences between walking in a gait lab and walking in daily life may be caused by the effect of observational awareness in the lab (also known as the Hawthorne effect), and the lack of dual-tasks (DT) during the analysis (which are common during daily life walking). Since so far there is no technique to reliably measure gait kinematics in children with CP outside of the laboratory, the researchers aim to objectify the influence of both the Hawthorne effect and dual-tasks by introducing different conditions during a standard clinical 3D gait analysis.
Detailed description
Study design: Observational study Study population: Patients with cerebral palsy, bilateral spastic, knee flexion gait pattern, GMFCS classification I-III, age 4-16 years. Objective: To determine the effect of observational awareness (the Hawthorne effect) and dual-tasks on spatiotemporal and kinematic variables during a clinical 3D gait analysis. Primary research question: Does reduced observational awareness and/or introduction of a dual-task influence knee flexion in stance phase in children with spastic diplegie cerebral palsy and knee flexion gait? Secondary research questions: 1. Does reduced observational awareness and/or introduction of a dual-task increase toe walking in children with spastic diplegie cerebral palsy and knee flexion gait? 2. In children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy and knee flexion gait, do spatiotemporal gait parameters change when observational awareness is reduced and/or a dual-task is introduced? Conditions in which gait data will be gathered: 1. With awareness of observation + without Dual-task 2. With awareness of observation + with Dual-task 3. Without awareness of observation + without Dual-task 4. Without awareness of observation + with Dual-task
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Roessingh Research and Development
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Cerebral palsy, bilateral spastic, GMFCS classification I-III * Age \<16 years * Use of bilateral AFO's (rigid or ground reaction AFO's) to improve knee extension in stance
Exclusion criteria
* Behavioural issues or poor instructability which might affect participation in the protocol * Significant visual disorders * Other diagnoses influencing gait * Not willing to sign informed consent before inclusion
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Minimal knee flexion during the single support phase | Day 1 | Minimal knee flexion during the single support phase |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Foot to floor angle at initial contact | Day 1 | — |
| Knee flexion at initial contact | Day 1 | — |
| Foot to floor angle at moment of minimal knee flexion in single support phase | Day 1 | — |
| Variation of knee kinematics in stance phase | Day 1 | Calculated with the Winters-Waveform Coefficient of variation |
| Variation of ankle kinematics in stance phase | Day 1 | Calculated with the Winters-Waveform Coefficient of variation |
| Walking speed | Day 1 | — |
| Cadence | Day 1 | — |
| Step length | Day 1 | — |
Countries
Netherlands
Contacts
CONTACTMartin Oude Alink, Msc
STUDY_CHAIRHans Rietman, Professor
Roessingh Research and Development
Outcome results
None listed