Skip to content

Radial Versus Femoral Access For Carotid Artery Stenting

Radial Versus Femoral Access For Carotid Artery Stenting In Patients With Carotid-Artery Stenosis :a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Noninferiority Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05416853
Acronym
RACE-CAS
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2022-06-14
Start date
2022-07-04
Completion date
2026-03-20
Last updated
2026-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid Artery Diseases, Carotid Stenosis, Cerebral Revascularization, Ischemic Stroke

Brief summary

Background: For moderate to severe carotid artery atherosclerotic stenosis, in the past decades, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. The transfemoral artery (TFA) using Seldinger's technique has been the most commonly used approach for CAS. The radial artery is an ideal puncture site for cerebrovascular intervention. Studies have shown that nerve intervention through radial artery approach can complete most cerebrovascular intervention procedures, including cerebral angiography, carotid artery stent implantation, vertebral artery stent implantation, intracranial artery stent implantation, mechanical thrombectomy, aspiration, intra-arterial thrombolysis and so on. However, the current studies are based on single center small sample studies, and there has been still a lack of large sample randomized controlled experiments to verify the safety and effectiveness of CAS in transradial artery (TRA) . Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAS via TRA in patients with carotid artery stenosis through a multicenter, prospective and randomized study. Study design: This study is a randomized, open label, multicenter, parallel controlled trial. A non-inferiority test is performed to compare the primary end point between the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group will undergo carotid stent implantation via radial artery approach, while the control group will use femoral artery approach. Study population: Adult patients with symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis ≥50% or asymptomatic stenosis ≥70%. Study outcomes: Primary end points: The incidence of death, or new-onset stroke, or myocardial infarction, or severe hemorrhage events within 30 days post-procedure Secondary end points:1.The incidence of death, or new-onset stroke, or myocardial infarction, or severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours post-procedure. 2. The incidence of death, new-onset stroke and myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 3. The incidence of death within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 4. The incidence of new-onset stroke within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 5. The incidence of myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 6. The incidence of severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. Other end points: 1. Successful rate of cerebral angiography. 2. Successful rate of CAS. 3. Degree of patient-reported comfort. 4. Operation time. 5. NIHSS score changes within 5-7 days post-procedure. 6. mRS score score within 30 days post-procedure. Safety outcomes: 1.Occurrence of all adverse events. 2. AEs related to operation and device. 3. Incidence of adverse event of special interest.

Interventions

CAS involves insertion of a catheter or tube into an artery in the groin or the radial, and then threading the catheter through the arteries of the body to the location of the plaque within the carotid artery in the neck. A stent is then placed to cover the plaque and hold the artery open.

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* General inclusion criteria 1\) Age≥18 years old * Clinical inclusion criteria 1. Symptomatic stenosis: patients had a transient ischemic attack (TIA), amaurosis, or minor nondisabling stroke involving the target carotid artery within 180 days before randomization. 2. Asymptomatic stenosis: The results of medical history, physical examination and neurological examination do not suggest ischemic symptoms in the target carotid artery. If artery stenosis degree reache the standard, but there are any one or more of the following symptoms including: non-carotid artery symptoms; contralateral carotid artery symptoms; time from symptom to randomization more than 180 days; and vertebrobasilar artery symptoms. In these situations, patients are considered to be asymptomatic. 3. Pulsation is palpable in the radial and femoral arteries, and the radial artery must meet any of the following criteria: Allen test or Barbeau test suggesting that ulnar artery collateral circulation is good, or preoperative ultrasound confirming that the radial artery and ulnar artery are well developed. 4. No family planning within half one year after informed consent signed, or negative pregnancy test for women with childbearing potential. 5. Patients or their guardians can understand the study purpose, voluntarily participate in the trial, sign informed consent, and complete follow-up visits. * Vascular inclusion criteria 1. Lesions located in the internal carotid artery, with or without involvement of the adjacent common carotid artery (CCA). 2. For symptomatic patients, at least one of the following conditions should be met: stenosis of 70% or more on ultrasonography; 70% or more on computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); 50% or more on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) according to NASCET standard. 3. For asymptomatic patients, at least one of the following conditions should be met: stenosis of 70% or more on ultrasonography; 80% or more on CTA or MRA; 60% or more on DSA according to NASCET standard. 4. When bilateral carotid stenosis presented, only unilateral carotid artery can be treated. The other carotid artery, as a non-study artery, should be dealt with 30 days before randomization or 30 days after treatment. 5. According to clinician experience, the operation access would be reasonable and the surgical instruments could be successfully delivered to the lesion site.

Exclusion criteria

* General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of death, or new-onset stroke, or myocardial infarction, or severe hemorrhage events within 30 days post-procedure30 daysThe composite end point event is defined as any one of death, new-onset stroke, myocardial infarction, and severe hemorrhage events within 30 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of death, or new-onset stroke, or myocardial infarction, or severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours post-procedure48 hoursThe composite end point event is defined as any one of death, new-onset stroke, myocardial infarction, and severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours
The incidence of death, new-onset stroke and myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure48 hours / 30 daysThe incidence of death, new-onset stroke and myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure
The incidence of death within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure48 hours / 30 daysThe incidence of death within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure
The incidence of new-onset stroke within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure48 hours / 30 daysThe incidence of new-onset stroke within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure
The incidence of myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure48 hours / 30 daysThe incidence of myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure
The incidence of severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure48 hours / 30 daysThe incidence of severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 9, 2026