Bruxism, Face Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
Objectives: To compare the effects of cervical manipulation on the ranges of motion of mouth opening and painful pressure points in the masseter and temporal muscles after of cervical manipulation compared to the control group. Material and methods: Single-blind randomized clinical trial with two arms, one group intervention and a control group. Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in mouth opening and painful pressure points between the intervention group and the control group. Expected results: The intervention group would significantly increase their mouth opening maximal and decrease pressure pain in the masseter and temporalis muscles.
Interventions
high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical manipulation
lateral flexion and cervical rotation without manipulation
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects over 18 years of age, men and women * Students with neck and/or facial pain minimum 3/10 VAS scale * Kinesiology students who regularly attend face-to-face classes who have a mobility pass and a health declaration. · Students who read and sign the informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Orthognathic surgery * Head and neck fracture or injury * Contraindication (red flag) to perform high-speed, low-amplitude cervical manipulation (bone cancer, osteoporosis, vertebral artery injury, etc.) * Positive cervical safety tests (example: Klein test positive)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| normal mouth opening in millimeters | Change from Baseline mouth open at 5 minutes | With a buccal goniometer, the maximum mouth opening will be measured in millimeters. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| masseter muscle pressure points | Change from Baseline pain points at 5 minutes | Pain points will be measured under pressure with a pressure pain meter or algo meter. This measurement will be measured in kilograms. |
Countries
Chile