Skip to content

Effect of Cervical Manipulation on Mouth Opening

Effect of Cervical Manipulation on Mouth Opening

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05416788
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-06-13
Start date
2022-05-11
Completion date
2022-05-11
Last updated
2022-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bruxism, Face Pain

Brief summary

Objectives: To compare the effects of cervical manipulation on the ranges of motion of mouth opening and painful pressure points in the masseter and temporal muscles after of cervical manipulation compared to the control group. Material and methods: Single-blind randomized clinical trial with two arms, one group intervention and a control group. Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in mouth opening and painful pressure points between the intervention group and the control group. Expected results: The intervention group would significantly increase their mouth opening maximal and decrease pressure pain in the masseter and temporalis muscles.

Interventions

high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical manipulation

OTHERSham intervention

lateral flexion and cervical rotation without manipulation

Sponsors

University of Americas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects over 18 years of age, men and women * Students with neck and/or facial pain minimum 3/10 VAS scale * Kinesiology students who regularly attend face-to-face classes who have a mobility pass and a health declaration. · Students who read and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Orthognathic surgery * Head and neck fracture or injury * Contraindication (red flag) to perform high-speed, low-amplitude cervical manipulation (bone cancer, osteoporosis, vertebral artery injury, etc.) * Positive cervical safety tests (example: Klein test positive)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
normal mouth opening in millimetersChange from Baseline mouth open at 5 minutesWith a buccal goniometer, the maximum mouth opening will be measured in millimeters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
masseter muscle pressure pointsChange from Baseline pain points at 5 minutesPain points will be measured under pressure with a pressure pain meter or algo meter. This measurement will be measured in kilograms.

Countries

Chile

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026