Skip to content

Denosumab Effect on Bone Quality and Function After Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Denosumab Protects Bone Loss and Function in Osteopenia Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Diseases After Lumbar Fusion Surgery, a Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05415657
Enrollment
76
Registered
2022-06-13
Start date
2020-01-12
Completion date
2023-01-10
Last updated
2023-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Denosumab Allergy, Osteopenia, Spine Fusion

Brief summary

Degenerative lumbar spinal diseases have become a common health problem and the most frequent indication for spinal surgery in elderly individuals. It mainly contain lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis, occurs in most people over 60 years of age, and patients primarily diagnosed with lumbar degenerative disease are more likely to have osteoporosis. Our study was to explore denosumab effect on bone quality and functional status in osteopenia patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after lumbar fusion surgery.

Detailed description

However, It was still unknown for denosumab effect on osteopenia patients after lumbar fusion. Bone mineral density(BMD), bone turnover marker, lumbar functional status Roland-Morris Disability Functioning Questionnaire (RMDQ) and quality of life EuroQol Five-Dimension (EQ-5D), and Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis-31 (QUALEFFO-31) score, rate of new fracture, re-operation, lumbar fusion, complications or adverse events were still unknown. Our study will explore the effect of denosumab on lumbar, total hip, femoral neck BMD and bone turnover markers, functional status EQ-5D, QUALEFFO-31 and RMDQ score of participants after lumbar fusion at 12 months follow-up.

Interventions

DRUGDenosumab

Denosumab 60 mg per 6 month were injected subcutaneously on the same day after lumbar fusion surgery, and all participants received calcium supplementation 1200 mg/D and vitamin D 800 IU/D.

DRUGPlacebo

Equal volume of saline (0.9%) as placebo Q6M were injected subcutaneously on the same day after lumbar fusion surgery, and all participants received calcium supplementation 1200 mg/D and vitamin D 800 IU/D.

Sponsors

Shenzhen People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged 40 to 85 years * who diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar spondylolisthesis * osteopenia with BMD T score between -1.0 and -2.5 via dual-energy X-ray * low back pain or leg numbness or weakness * MRI demonstrated signs of nerve compression

Exclusion criteria

* cauda equina syndrome * progressive neurologic deficit * history of cancer * scoliosis greater than 15° * back open surgery history * have contraindications for surgery * who had anti-osteoporosis medication within 6 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lumbar bone mineral density (BMD)up to 12 monthsLumbar vertebral (L1 to L4, except the surgery segment) BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via Dual-energy X-ray.
Total hip BMDup to 12 monthsTotal hip BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via Dual-energy X-ray.
Femoral neck BMDup to 12 monthsFemoral neck BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via Dual-energy X-ray.
Type 1 n-terminal propeptide P1NPup to 12 monthsBone formation marker, type 1 n-terminal propeptide P1NP were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
C-terminal crosslinking type 1 collagen terminal peptide CTXup to 12 monthsBone resorption marker, C-terminal crosslinked type 1 collagen terminal peptide, CTX were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Visual analog scale (VAS) backup to 12 monthsVAS score for back pain were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Use a ruler about 10cm long, one side is marked with 0 and the other 10 respectively. A score of 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most unbearable pain.
VAS legup to 12 monthsVAS score for leg pain were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Use a ruler about 10cm long, one side is marked with 0 and the other 10 respectively. A score of 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most unbearable pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EQ-5D quality of life questionnaireup to 12 monthEQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based quality of life measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. From this, a quality of life score can be calculated ranging from -0.594, indicating a health state worse than death where 0 is death, to 1, indicating full health
Adverse effectup to 12 monthThe main adverse effect including deep vein thrombosis, rash, joint pain, headache, nausea, pneumonia, necrosis of jaw, atypical femoral fracture, pulmonary embolism, transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), stroke, acute renal failure, myocardial infarction and so on.
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaireup to 12 monthThe Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is a health status measure designed to be completed by patients to assess physical disability due to low back pain. The lowest score is 0, the highest 24. The higher the score, the more severe the dysfunction.
QUALEFFO-31 Questionnaireup to 12 monthQUALEFFO-31, which contains three domains including pain, physical function, and mental function. The worse the health related quality of life condition, the higher the score. This scale is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the highest QoL and 100 the lowest.
Lumbar Fusion rateup to 12 monthWe determined lumbar fusion rate via CT at 12 month after surgery.The lowest rate is 0, the highest 100%. The higher the score represents higher fusion rate.
New fracture rateup to 12 monthNew fracture rate including new vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fracture was assessed at 12 month after surgery. The lowest score was 0, the highest score was 100%. The lower score represents no fracture.
Reoperation rateup to 12 monthReoperation rate was assessed at 12 month after surgery. The lowest reoperation rate was 0, the highest score was 100%.
Complicationsup to 12 monthComplications such as cage subsidence, pedicle screw loosening, infection, peripheral nerve injury, recurrent symptoms were assessed at 12 months follow-up.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026