Skip to content

Dysmenorrhea Exploration in Teenagers, Their Parents and Caregivers

Monocentric Descriptive Study Regarding the Impact of Severe Dysmenorrhea on Teenagers, Their Parents and Caregivers Receiving Those Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05414825
Acronym
DEMETER
Enrollment
27
Registered
2022-06-10
Start date
2022-08-29
Completion date
2022-09-13
Last updated
2022-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysmenorrhea

Keywords

Endometriosis, severe dysmenorrhea, pain, teenagers, pediatric, qualitative research, focus group, patient care management

Brief summary

Teenagers experimenting severe dysmenorrhea also face age-specific challenges, particularly impacting their self-confidence, self-esteem, and relations. On one hand, the study team will conduct focus group interviews to better understand the experience of teenagers and their parents consulting pediatric services for severe dysmenorrhea. On the other hand, they will conduct focus group interviews with caregivers from services that usually encounter such patients (gastrologic, gynecologic and pain services). This, allowing to later propose specific tools and healthcare organization to evaluate and accompany teenagers suffering from severe dysmenorrhea.

Detailed description

Endometriosis is a complex disease that remains underdiagnosed (7 to 9 years delay), and incorrectly treated. While endometriosis was at first considered as a condition affecting adult women, since the early 2000s, literature has described more and more cases of adolescent patients, with frequently atypical presentations. Indirect prevalence estimates ranging from 25% to 100% in adolescents' girls with pelvic pain. Moreover, Arruda et al. indicate that adolescents girls arrive after a delay in diagnosis which has a significant impact on the progression of the disease and on their confidence in the medical listening and understanding abilities. However, the pain induced by dysmenorrhea has a profound impact on everyday life of and are frequently responsible for school missing as shown in the RESENDO survey. By conducting a qualitative analysis based on focus groups, the main objective of the study is to describe as faithfully and extensively as possible the experience of teenage patients and their parents consulting for severe dysmenorrhea, and delineate factors potentially improving or hindering care engagement. The study utilizes a qualitative method as a tool to have a better understanding of this population, a population increasing in pediatric gynecology services or pain management consultations. Gathering their words, their views on their symptoms and its repercussions, and their main issues, will enable to build a relationship of trust with caregivers, better address the broad problematic, and identify risk factors.

Interventions

Group interview gathering words, views, symptoms and its repercussions, and main issues of the subjects regarding severe dysmenorrhea

Sponsors

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

: * For teenage groups: * adolescents between 11 and 17 years old * consulting for severe dysmenorrhea (whether through pediatric gynecology, pain management or gastric consultation) * For parents groups: o Parent (mother or father) of an adolescent patient consulting for severe dysmenorrhea * For medical staff groups: * Member of a consultation receiving adolescent patients with severe dysmenorrhea * All type of professionals (nurses, psychologist, doctors…)

Exclusion criteria

: * For teenage groups: * suffering from an identified chronical disease * identified psychiatric condition * For parents groups: o Parents whose adolescent opposes their participation in this study * For medical staff groups: * no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
main themes emerging from focus groupup to one yearqualitative outcome : identifying the main verbatim used during the focus group

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026