Skip to content

Assessment of Digital Consultations on Clinical Impact and Efficiency

Assessment of Digital Consultations on Clinical Impact and Efficiency Using a RCT (ADMINISTER) Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05413447
Acronym
ADMINISTER
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-06-10
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2024-06-06
Last updated
2024-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Digital consultations, GDMT optimization, HFrEF

Brief summary

Healthcare workers have a high workload as compared to other sectors and this burden is projected to increase due to an aging society. It is and will in the future be challenging to deliver optimal HF care because of personnel shortages, the high costs of healthcare, intensive GDMT uptitration schedules, and an epidemic rise in HF patients.This study aims to evaluate the impact of digital consultations (DC) on efficiency and clinical impact in heart failure (HF) patients. A randomized controlled trial on multifaceted digital consults including 1) digital data sharing (e.g. exchange of pharmacotherapy use, home measured vital signs, etc), 2) patient education via an eLearning, and 3) digital guideline recommendations to treating physicians. Included patients will be randomly (1:1) assigned to the intervention group or standard care. The ADMINISTER trial is expected to offer the first robust randomized controlled multicenter data of GDMT prescription rates, time till full GDMT optimization, time spent on healthcare, patient satisfaction and quality of life of digital consults in GDMT optimization.

Detailed description

Introduction: Many heart failure (HF) patients do not receive optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) despite clear benefit on morbidity and mortality outcomes. Digital consultations (DC) have the potential to improve efficiency on GDMT optimization to serve the growing HF population. Hence, the investigator initiated ADMINISTER trial was designed as a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of DC in patients on HF treatment. Methods: Patients (n = 150) diagnosed with HF with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) will be randomized to DC or standard care (1:1). The intervention group receive multifaceted digital consults including 1) digital data sharing (e.g. exchange of pharmacotherapy use, home measured vital signs, etc), 2) patient education via an eLearning, and 3) digital guideline recommendations to treating physicians. The consultations are performed remotely unless there is an indication to perform the consult physically. The primary outcome is the GDMT prescription rate score, secondary outcomes include time till full GDMT optimization, patient and clinician satisfaction, time spent on healthcare, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaire. Results will be reported in accordance to the CONSORT statement. Conclusion: The ADMINISTER trial will offer the first randomized controlled data on GDMT prescription rates, time till full GDMT optimization, time spent on healthcare, quality of life, and patient and clinician satisfaction of the multifaceted patient and clinician targeted DC for GDMT optimization.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTDigital consult

Consultations will be prepared digitally using the Mychart patient portal, an elearning and questionnaires. The consultation takes place via Teams.

Sponsors

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Masking the clinicians of the control group assignment is done to optimally capture local practice. Masking of the intervention group is not feasable as patients and healthcare workers will know whether they are receiving normal care or digital care. Outcome measures are determined beforehand.

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HFrEF

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not in possession of any attributes to perform the consults digitally

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prescription rate of periodic screening of iron insufficiency12 weeks after baselineIt is checked whether periodic (once a year) screening of iron deficiency is performed. And if the patient had iron insufficiency; it is checked whether the patient is receiving intravenous iron administration. Iron insufficiency is defined as ferritin \<100 ng/ml or ferritin \< 300 ng/ml with transferrin saturation (TSAT) \< 20%. For patients with periodic screening for iron deficiency and if appropriate supplementation, a score of 1 was assigned. Other patients will receive a score of 0. Significant differences between groups will be assessed at both timepoints.
Prescription rate of ACE/ARNI according to the guidelines12 weeks after baselineThe treatment with ACE/ARNI in accordance to the guideline is measured at baseline and within 4 weeks after the consult. The received dose is divided by the target dose per timepoint. The score will range between a maximum of 1 (corresponding with a treatment according to the guidelines) and a minimum of 0 (corresponding with not administering the medicine). Significant differences between the two groups are determined at both timepoints.
Prescription rate of betablockers according to the guidelines12 weeks after baselineThe treatment with betablockers in accordance to the guideline is measured at baseline and within 4 weeks after the consult. The received dose is divided by the target dose per timepoint. The score will range between a maximum of 1 (corresponding with a treatment according to the guidelines) and a minimum of 0 (corresponding with not administering the medicine). Significant differences between the two groups are determined at both timepoints.
Prescription rate of MRA according to the guidelines12 weeks after baselineThe treatment with MRA in accordance to the guideline is measured at baseline and within 4 weeks after the consult. The received dose is divided by the target dose per timepoint. The score will range between a maximum of 1 (corresponding with a treatment according to the guidelines) and a minimum of 0 (corresponding with not administering the medicine). Significant differences between the two groups are determined at both timepoints.
Prescription rate of SGLT2i according to the guidelines12 weeks after baselineThe treatment with SGLT2i in accordance to the guideline is measured at baseline and within 4 weeks after the consult. The received dose is divided by the target dose per timepoint. The score will range between a maximum of 1 (corresponding with a treatment according to the guidelines) and a minimum of 0 (corresponding with not administering the medicine). Significant differences between the two groups are determined at both timepoints.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time spend on healthcare12 weeks after baselineThe amount of time the patient spends on healthcare.
Patient satisfactionAt baseline and 12 weeks after the baseline recordingPatient satisfaction measured with the Net Promotor Score. This is a score in which the patient is asked to give a value between 1 and 10 indicating the likelihood that he/she will recommend the care given at the AUMC to other patients (1 equals unlikely and 10 likely).
Difference in summary score of Kansas city cardiomyopathy questionnaireAt baseline and 12 weeks after the baseline recordingWorsening of experienced HF, assessed with the Kansas city cardiomyopathy questionnaire. This will lead to a summary score indicating the severity of the experienced heart failure. This score will range from 0 indicating a bad outcome of the questionnaire to 100 indicating a good outcome.
Amount of hospitalizations per patientHospitalization are recorded from baseline until 12 weeks after baselineAmount of hospitalizations is recorded for each patient and group differences between the treatment and control group are determined
Healthcare satisfaction12 weeks after baselineClinicians will be asked to rate their satisfaction using the Net Promotor Score. This is a score in which the clinician is asked to give a value between 1 and 10 indicating the likelihood that he/she will recommend the remote care with digital consultations to other collegues (1 equals unlikely and 10 likely).

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026