Class I Medical Device on Post-surgical Scars

Head-to-head, Randomized Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Class I Pullulan Based Medical Device Containing Allium Cepa and Hyaluronic Acid Compared to Class I Medical Device Silicone Gel on Post-surgical Scars

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05412745

Enrollment

Registered

2022-06-09

Start date

2022-05-01

Completion date

2022-09-10

Last updated

2022-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix, Hypertrophic Scar, Keloid, Post-Surgical Complication, Scar Itching

Keywords

scar, Keloid, Cicatrix, allium cepa, silicone

Brief summary

To compare the effect of a class I pullulan based medical device containing Allium cepa & HA versus a class I medical device silicone gel on new post-surgical wounds

Detailed description

A head-to-head, randomised, pivotal controlled trial evaluating the appearance of post-surgical scars for 12 weeks. The study was developed in 10 months, including recruitment, evaluation every 4 weeks and evaluation of the secondary objective in the third month (T2). The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the effectiveness of the class I medical device contain onion (Allium cepa) extract compared to the silicone gel used in the treatment of post-surgical scars for the prevention of hypertrophic scars. Objective scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Manchester Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), itching, redness and pliability were performed after 4,8 and 12 weeks of treatment. Safety was also evaluated by gathering adverse events related to application of the gel. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out by applying parametric or non-parametric tests depending on the distribution of the data that was going to be obtained. The one-way analysis of variance ANOVA test was used to evaluate the reduction/increase of clinical parameters in the pre-established observation times (T0, T2, T3 and T4) for each treatment, whereas comparison between treatments was performed via t-test analysis. Correlation tests were also used. The differences were considered statistically significant for p values \<0.05.

Interventions

DEVICEKaloidon Plus

topical application; twice daily

DEVICEsilicone gel

topical application; twice daily

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

PREVENTION

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 70 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects aged between 18 and 70 who have undergone surgery for the excision of skin lesions at least 20 days before the start of the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects affected by spontaneous keloids * Diabetic subjects with a previous history of disorders in the repair of wounds; * Subjects with overinfected wounds after the first week after surgery; * Subjects with documented sensitivity to silicone gel; * Subjects affected by collagen disorders (e.g. Pseudoxantoma elasticum, poikilodermatosis).

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Change of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12.	week 4,8,12	Change of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12. Lower score denotes a better outcome using the POSAS (range: 0-10).
Change of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS)	week 4,8,12	Change of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12. * vascularity(range from normal(0 point) to purple(3point) * pigmentation(range from normal(0 point) to hyper-pigmentation(3point) * pliability(range from normal(0 point) to contracture(5point) * height (range from flat(0 point) to above 5mm(3point) * pain(range from none(0 point) to Require medication(2point) * itchiness(range from none(0 point) to Require medication(2point) We assess total score that are minimum score is 0 and maximum is 18. The lowest score means the best scar condition.
Change of Manchester Scale	week 4,8,12	Change of Manchester Scale from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12. * Color (range from perfect (1 point) to Gross mismatch (4 points) * Shine ( from matte (1 point) to shiny (2 points)) * Contour ( from Flush with surrounding skin (1 point) to keloid (4 points)) * Distortion ( from none (1 point) to severe (4 points)) Lower score denotes a better outcome using the MSS (range: 4-14).
Change of pliability from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12	week 4,8,12	Change of pliability from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be measured by testing folding of the scar with a six-step scale: normal, supple, yielding, firm, banding, and contracture. Lower score denotes a better outcome (range: 0-10).
Change of itching from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12	week 4,8,12	Change of itching from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be measure with the visual analogue scale (VAS). Lower score denotes a better outcome using the VAS (range: 0-10).
Change of redness from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12	week 4,8,12	Change of redness from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be evaluted as 10 points scale, from normal (1 point) to purple (10 points). Lower score denotes a better outcome (range: 0-10).

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Incidence of adverse events occurrence after treatment	week 12	Incidence of adverse events will be evaluated since the baseline visit until 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. Adverse Events reported by patients or noticed by investigator will be reported as local skin reactions.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026