Skip to content

A Multicenter Randomized Open-label Study of Chidamide Plus HD-DEX Versus HD-DEX in ITP

A Multicenter Randomized Open-label Study of Chidamide Combined With High-dose Dexamethasone Versus High-dose Dexamethasone in the Management of Newly-Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05411874
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-06-09
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2024-10-30
Last updated
2022-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thrombocytopenia

Keywords

HD-DEX, Chidamide

Brief summary

Recently, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) has been used for their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities. It has been shown that HDACi can alleviate graft-versus-host disease by enhancing the number and function of Foxp3+ Tregs. Our group found that low-dose HDACi alleviated thrombocytopenia in both passive and active murine models of ITP. Furthermore, low-dose HDACi attenuated macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-coated platelets, stimulated production of natural Foxp3+ Tregs, promoted peripheral conversion of T cells into Tregs, and restored Treg suppressive function in vivo and in vitro. The project was undertaking by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and other 10 well-known hospitals in China. In order to report the efficacy and safety of the low dose chidamide combined with high-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in the management of ITP.

Detailed description

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with low platelet count. Low-dose HDACi alleviated thrombocytopenia in both passive and active murine models of ITP. In this multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial, newly diagnosed ITP patients will be enrolled from 11 tertiary medical centres in China. Participants will be randomly assigned into the combination group or the monotherapy group by masked statisticians in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoints are sustained response at month 6. The secondary outcomes include initial response, time to response, duration of response, bleeding score, health-related quality of life assessment, and safety issue. This study will compare the efficacy and safety of low dose chidamide combined with high-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone monotherapy in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia.

Interventions

DRUGChidamide

5mg po biw for 24 weeks

DRUGHD-DXM

40mg po qd for 4days

Sponsors

Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* newly diagnosed ITP patients need of treatment(s) to minimize the risk of clinically significant bleeding primary ITP confirmed by excluding other supervened causes of thrombocytopenia

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy hypertension cardiovascular disease diabetes liver and kidney function impairment HCV, HIV, HBsAg seropositive status patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained response6 monthThe maintenance of platelet count ≥ 30 x 10\^9/L, at least 2-fold increase of the baseline count, the absence of bleeding, and no need for rescue medication at the 6-month follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with bleeding6 monthNumber of patients with bleeding complication. Bleeding symptoms were graded according a standardized bleeding scale specific to primary immune thrombocytopenia on the basis of site and severity of bleeding by Khellaf et al (PMID: 15951296). A modification was made to exclude age from the original scale so that only bleeding symptoms were described. Scores ranged from 0 to 59, with higher values indicating higher bleeding risk.
Number of patients with adverse events6 monthAdverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). At each visit, we recorded adverse events. Routine visits were scheduled once a week for the first 4 weeks and once a month thereafter.
Initial responseday 14CR: platelet count ≥ 100 × 109/L and absence of bleeding; R: platelet count ≥ 30 × 109/L but \< 100 × 109/L and a doubling from baseline and absence of bleeding.
Duration of response (DOR)6 monthDuration of response was defined as the time from achievement of a complete response or a partial response to the loss of response (platelet count \<30 × 10⁹ cells per L; measured on two occasions more than 1 day apart or the presence of bleeding).
Health-related quality of life assessment6 monthHealth-related quality of life was assessed using a self-administered immune thrombocytopenia Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) at baseline and at week 12. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality of life.
Time to response6 monthThe time from starting treatment to time of achievement of CR or R

Contacts

Primary ContactMing Hou, Doctor
houming@medmail.com.cn
Backup ContactMing Hou, Doctor
houming@medmail.com.cn82169896

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026