Skip to content

Non-Linear Imaging of Skin In Vivo

Non-Linear Imaging of Skin In Vivo: VIO In Vivo Skin Imaging evaluatiON (VISION)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05410964
Acronym
VISION
Enrollment
122
Registered
2022-06-08
Start date
2018-03-28
Completion date
2022-08-06
Last updated
2024-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Abnormalities, Skin Cancer, Skin Condition, Skin Diseases, Skin Lesion

Brief summary

The overall objective of this study is to investigate the potential for the VIO System to display microscopic skin structure in people of different age, sex, race, and skin health.

Interventions

DEVICEVIO System

To investigate the potential for the VIO System to display microscopic skin structure in people of different age, sex, race, and skin health

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Enspectra Health
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects, ages 2 - 90 years old. 2. Subject, or guardian, if applicable, must be willing to provide written informed consent prior to enrollment and agree to comply with protocol requirements. If applicable, child must be willing to provide written assent prior to enrollment and agree to comply with protocol requirements. 3. Subject or guardian, if applicable, must have sufficient mental capacity to understand the Informed Consent and provide clinically relevant and reliable feedback regarding their experience with the device. 4. Subject and guardian, if applicable, must comply with the protocol requirements. 5. Subject or guardian, if applicable, must agree that anonymized personal data will be made available to Study Sponsor and requisite regional and international regulatory bodies.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any general health condition or systemic disease that may represent, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, a potential increased risk associated with device use 2. Currently infected with a communicable skin infection (e.g., shingles or methicillin-resistant S. aureus), which does not include local and minimally pathogenic or non-pathogenic infections distant from the imaging location(s) (e.g., warts, acne) 3. Any known allergies to any materials used in the preparation of skin and/or device use 4. Has a temporary or permanent electrical implanted medical device \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VIO System Imaging Performance3 hoursQuantify imaging performance in various types of skin, which may include estimated in vivo resolution and imaging depth. Various types of skin includes skin of different people as well as skin in different locations on the body, and skin with skin disease, including basal cell carcinoma. VIO System device design characteristics were iterated during the study to optimize image quality across subjects with various skin types, body locations, and skin disease states. The outcome measure of device imaging performance (acceptable/not acceptable) was assessed through engineering expert review of VIO images. The engineering expert review determined whether images were of consistent quality.
VIO System Image Quality3 hoursQualitatively evaluate image quality and interpretability by physicians trained in dermatopathology as a function of skin type. VIO System device design characteristics were iterated during the study to optimize image quality across subjects with various skin types, body locations, and skin disease states. The outcome measure of device image quality (acceptable/not acceptable) was assessed through clinical expert review of VIO images. The clinical expert review determined whether VIO images could be interpreted by physicians trained in dermatopathology.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VIO Imaging
Healthy subjects, volunteers as well subjects with suspected skin condition recruited from dermatology clinics
122
Total122

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVIO Imaging
Age, Continuous47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
111 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type I
6 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type II
30 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type III
46 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type IV
25 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type V
5 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Type VI
1 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Unknown
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
84 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
122 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
75 Participants
Skin Health
Healthy
90 Participants
Skin Health
Suspected or known skin diseases
32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 122
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 122
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 122

Outcome results

Primary

VIO System Image Quality

Qualitatively evaluate image quality and interpretability by physicians trained in dermatopathology as a function of skin type. VIO System device design characteristics were iterated during the study to optimize image quality across subjects with various skin types, body locations, and skin disease states. The outcome measure of device image quality (acceptable/not acceptable) was assessed through clinical expert review of VIO images. The clinical expert review determined whether VIO images could be interpreted by physicians trained in dermatopathology.

Time frame: 3 hours

Population: VIO System Image Quality assessment was conducted on images taken of all participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VIO ImagingVIO System Image Quality122 # participants with acceptable images
Primary

VIO System Imaging Performance

Quantify imaging performance in various types of skin, which may include estimated in vivo resolution and imaging depth. Various types of skin includes skin of different people as well as skin in different locations on the body, and skin with skin disease, including basal cell carcinoma. VIO System device design characteristics were iterated during the study to optimize image quality across subjects with various skin types, body locations, and skin disease states. The outcome measure of device imaging performance (acceptable/not acceptable) was assessed through engineering expert review of VIO images. The engineering expert review determined whether images were of consistent quality.

Time frame: 3 hours

Population: VIO System Imaging Performance assessment was conducted on images taken of all participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VIO ImagingVIO System Imaging Performance122 # participants with acceptable images

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026