Skip to content

Osseodensification Drills Versus Piezoelectric Surgery

Changes in Implant Stability Using Different Site Preparation Techniques: Osseodensification Drills Versus Piezoelectric Surgery. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05410405
Enrollment
27
Registered
2022-06-08
Start date
2020-11-15
Completion date
2022-04-15
Last updated
2022-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous; Alveolar Process, Atrophy

Brief summary

implant stability is the first requirement for implant success. the aim is to assess whether different implant site preparation technique may impact the value of the primary stability.

Detailed description

Impianti stability represents one of the most fundamental issue for implant success. Different techniques of implant site preparation are available such as twist drill, osteotome, piezosurgery and lastly, osseodensification. Due to their different approach an biological rationale, piezosurgery and osseodensification might show diverse impact on implant first and secondary stability, therefore the aim of the present study was the assessment of primary and secondary stability changes of values between implant sites prepared with piezoelectric bone surgery and with specific osseodensification drills. Patients with bilateral single maxillary edentulism will randomly receive implant site preparation with piezoelectric approach or with osseodensification drills. standardized implants will be therefore inserted and primary stability will be assessed at the time of implant insertion and during the subsequent timepoints.

Interventions

piezoelectric bone surgery osseodensification drills

Sponsors

University of Foggia
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Trieste
CollaboratorOTHER
International Piezosurgery Academy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

implant stability assessment was blinded

Intervention model description

split mouth

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* bilateral single maxillary edentulism

Exclusion criteria

* smoking habit * history of periodontal disease * uncontrolled diabetes * pregnancy or breastfeeding * head and neck radiotherapy or chemotherapy * bone antiresorptive therapy * coagulopaties

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implant insertion torqueat implant insertioninsertion torque
implant stability quotientat implant insertionresonance frequency

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implant secondary stability7 days after implant insertionresonance frequency

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026