Skip to content

Clinical Characteristics, Management Patterns and Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection: A Sino-US Comparative Cohort Analysis

Clinical Characteristics, Management Patterns and Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection: A Sino-US Comparative Cohort Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05409469
Enrollment
11550
Registered
2022-06-08
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Dissection

Keywords

Aortic Dissection, China, the United States

Brief summary

This study constructed a retrospective cohort study by retrospectively analyzing the data of all patients with aortic dissection from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2021 from the Cardiovascular Disease Registration System of Jiangsu Province in China and the data of similar diseases in recent years from National Inpatient Sample database in the United States

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurgery

surgery on patients with aortic dissection

Sponsors

China Medical University, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Xin Chen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1.Clinical diagnosis of type A Aortic Dissection

Exclusion criteria

1. age\<18, age unknown, 2. diagnosis of aortic aneurysm, transfer out within 1 day, 3. unknown vital status at discharge; 4. unknown treatment type: cardioplegia, valve or cardiac repair only without aortic repair or two types of treatments on different days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline data of patients with type A aortic dissection was assessed by SPSS 17.0from 2015 to 2019Baseline data of patients with type A aortic dissection included gender, age,height, weight, past medical history, family history, hospital costs, etc.
The main efficacy indicators was assessed by SPSS 17.0.from 2015 to 2019The main efficacy indicators included surgical procedures, surgical outcome (postoperative bleeding, ICU stay, extubation time), perioperative complications (including infection, bleeding, neurological complications, cardic complications, renal insufficiency, etc.), and postoperative mortality.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026