Skip to content

A Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Two Types of Ultrasound Technologies in Women Who Have Had Breast Cancer

Feasibility of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) Versus Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) for Breast Cancer Surveillance in Women With Nipple Sparing or Skin Sparing Mastectomy With Reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05408260
Enrollment
12
Registered
2022-06-07
Start date
2022-11-18
Completion date
2025-02-17
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Breast Neoplasm

Brief summary

This clinical trial evaluates automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and handheld ultrasound (HHUS) for the screening of women who have undergone breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Ultrasounds use high-frequency sound waves to create pictures of internal organs and tissues. ABUS has been found to be equal to HHUS for whole breast screening, but no data exist on its use for screening of reconstructed patients. This clinical trial evaluates the feasibility of using ABUS versus HHUS to screen women who have undergone reconstruction.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To show that ABUS reduces artifact compared to HHUS in terms of detection of the residual tissue in reconstructed nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) patients. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate both the performance and interpretation times for ABUS and HHUS so that these factors can be considered when scheduling patients and for ease of implementation into practice. II. A short survey will be administered immediately after both ultrasounds performed to enrolled patients to assess their experience with HHUS and ABUS, specifically addressing their perceived comfort level on a numerical scale and if they would be interested in obtaining subsequent annual screening HHUS or ABUS. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. The appearance of native and reconstructed anatomy on ABUS and HHUS will be studied. OUTLINE: Participants undergo HHUS and ABUS in no required order over 1 hour. Participants with ultrasound results indicating Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5 (suspicious and needs biopsy) undergo biopsy within 30 days.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasonography

Undergo HHUS

Undergo ABUS

Sponsors

Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female * \>= 18 years of age at time of consent * Free of focal breast symptoms and with no suspicious breast physical exam findings * Previous unilateral NSM or SSM with implant (silicone, saline) or flap reconstruction performed at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital * Must be able to understand and provide signed and dated informed consent form. If a patient understands the informed consent but is unable to sign, a legally authorized representative (LAR) may sign * Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study * Willing to honor any bills that may be incurred if the insurance company does not pay for the billed bilateral hand held ultrasound

Exclusion criteria

* History of breast cancer recurrence * Current focal breast symptoms since NSM or SSM with reconstruction * NSM or SSM with reconstruction was performed years prior to study enrollment * Bilateral NSM or SSM with reconstruction * Females who are pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Detection of the residual tissue (i.e., artifact) in reconstructed nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) patients by automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and handheld ultrasound (HHUS)Up to 1 yearThis is a binary endpoint. The rate of artifact will be compared between handheld and automated scanning using McNemar test.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026