Skip to content

Comparison of Standard Epidural and Dural Puncture Epidural Analgesia in Open Gynecological Surgery Techniques

Comparison of the Efficiency of Standard Epidural and Dural Puncture Epidural Analgesia Techniques Guided by Nociception Level Index in Open Gynecological Surgery Under General Anesthesia: a Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05408052
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-06-07
Start date
2022-08-15
Completion date
2023-07-01
Last updated
2025-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard epidural and dural puncture epidural analgesia techniques used under NOL guidance. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of NOL-guided antinociception on intraoperative total local anesthetic consumption during anesthesia. The secondary aim is to compare onset time, analgesia duration time, hemodynamic parameters, time to first postoperative analgesic requirement, and postoperative side effects.

Detailed description

This prospective randomized double-blind study was planned in 36 adult female patients aged 18-75 years, with ASA I-III, who underwent elective open gynecological surgery under general anesthesia with lower midline or Pfannenstiel incision after Ataturk University Medical Faculty Hospital ethics committee approval and written consent of the patients.

Interventions

Using the 18G Tuohy needle in the sitting position, the epidural space will be determined from the L3-L4 or L4-L5 space using the loss-of-resistance method After Dural puncture will be performed using a 25G Whitacre needle from the Tuohy needle to patients in the DPE group and free CSF flow will be observed, but no medication will be applied to the subarachnoid space. Afterwards, epidural catheter will be placed and when the catheter is fixed, a test dose of 3 mL will be administered through the catheter to check for intravascular or subarachnoid catheter placement. An epidural local anesthetic will be administered throughout the catheter for intraoperative analgesia at 0,1% (bupivacaine+fentanyl+ saline) concentration with the NoL monitor guidance.

PROCEDUREStandart Epidural

The neuraxial procedure will be performed in the sitting position using the 18G Tuohy needle, in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 range using the loss-of-resistance method. The epidural catheter will be placed so that it remains 4 to 5 cm in the epidural space. After the catheter is fixed, a test dose of 3 mL will be administered through the catheter to check for intravascular or subarachnoid catheter placement. An epidural local anesthetic will be administered throughout the catheter for intraoperative analgesia at 0,1% (bupivacaine+fentanyl+ saline) concentration with the NoL monitor guidance.

Sponsors

Ataturk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I-III physical condition * patients aged between 18-75 years * elective surgeries under general anesthesia for gynecological procedures * lower midline or Pfannenstiel incision

Exclusion criteria

* patients with classical contraindications to neuraxial procedures, * morbidly obese (body mass index \> 40 kg / m2), * pregnant and lactating women * hypersensitive or allergic to local anesthetic agents, * abuse of drugs or alcohol in the past 6 months. * chronic opioid use before surgery, * using chronic psychoactive drugs in the 90 days before surgery, * patients with peripheral and central nervous system disease, * preoperative hemodynamic compromise (patients with irregular sinus heart rhythm and pacemaker) * patients using antimuscarinic, α2-adrenergic agonists, β1-adrenergic antagonists, antiarrhythmic agents, * patients with diabetes, severe lung and significant liver disease with increased bilirubin, * operations that will take less than 2 hours * MAP \>160 mmHg or \<60 mmHg, heart rate \>90 beats/min or \<45 beats/min on the day of surgery * patients who do not want to participate in the study will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary outcome is to compare the total amount of epidural local anesthetics consumed during the intraoperative periodintraoperative periodThe primary outcome is to compare the total amount of epidural local anesthetics (mg) consumed during the intraoperative period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Our secondary aim is to compare onset timeintraoperative periodOur secondary aim is to compare onset time

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026