Skip to content

Cleft Palate Technique and Maxillary Growth

Effect of 2 Flap Palatoplasty Versus Furlow With Buccinators Flap During Palatal Cleft Repair on the Maxillary Development Patterns in Comparison to Non-cleft Children at 5-6years of Age

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05405738
Enrollment
28
Registered
2022-06-06
Start date
2022-05-06
Completion date
2023-03-01
Last updated
2023-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cleft Palate, Growth

Brief summary

comparison of the maxillary growth between cleft palate patients that underwent to repair by 2 flap palatoplasty versus Furlow with buccinator technique

Interventions

PROCEDURE2 flap palatoplasty technique

cleft palate repair by 2 flap palatoplasty technique

control normal group

PROCEDUREFurlow with buccinator technique

cleft palate repair by Furlow with buccinator technique

Sponsors

Fayoum University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 5-6 years old childreen with previous treated complete cleft lip and palate, nonsyndromic. * lip and palate repair performed by one craniofacial surgeon

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with syndromic cleft lip. * Redu cases * Bilateral cleft lip * Patient older 6years or younger 5 years. * Associated Cardiac anomalies. * Any systemic condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
maxillar growththrough study completion, an average one weekevaluation of the maxillary growth through Inter-canine width (ICW) measurement by mm

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026