Skip to content

Effects of Aortic Valve Replacement on Myocardial T1 Values in Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Effects of Aortic Valve Replacement on Myocardial T1 Values in Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05404100
Acronym
FIBROTIC
Enrollment
86
Registered
2022-06-03
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2025-09-08
Last updated
2026-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Replacement, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Fibrosis, T1 Mapping

Keywords

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Replacement, Myocardial Fibrosis, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, T1 mapping

Brief summary

Background: Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the commonest valve disease. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is primarily indicated when symptoms occur and/or when there is a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction. However, irreversible myocardial damage, such as replacement fibrosis, leads to increased morbidity and mortality despite treatment. Improved patient selection and timely treatment is thus warranted. T1 mapping, a non-invasive method to quantify myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), could be a marker to guide treatment. Aims: To investigate the change of myocardial fibrosis\* in AS patients following AVR and if these changes are associated with disease and/or procedural characteristics. Methods: This is an observational clinical trial. Approximately 60 patients with severe AS planned to undergo AVR (either surgical or transcatheter) at Rigshospitalet, Denmark will be included. Participants will undergo CMR before surgery and at a 1-year follow-up. Other assessments include clinical evaluation and blood sampling. The primary end-point is change in T1 values after AVR. Hypotheses and perspectives: The investigators hypothesize that (1) myocardial fibrosis\* will regress in patients undergoing AVR as a group, (2) the degree of myocardial fibrosis is positively correlated with the degree of symptoms, (3) the regression of myocardial fibrosis is greater in patients undergoing TAVR compared to SAVR, and (4) the regression of myocardial fibrosis is greater in patients with tricuspid aortic stenosis compared to bicuspid aortic stenosis. Ultimately, T1 mapping is a potential marker for improved patient selection for the timing of AVR. \* Estimated by T1 mapping

Interventions

PROCEDUREAortic valve replacement

SAVR or TAVR

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER
Danish Cardiovascular Academy (DCA)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Eva og Henry Frænkels Mindefond
CollaboratorOTHER
Snedkermester Sophus Jacobsen and hustru Astrid Jacobsens Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Severe aortic valve stenosis (Vmax \> 4 m/s and/or mean gradient \>40 mmHg)

Exclusion criteria

* Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (\<50%) * More than mild left-sided valvular insufficiency * Previous or planned primary coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) * Persistent atrial fibrillation * Contraindications for CMR (pregnancy, severe claustrophobia, magnetic metallic implants) * Pacemaker/ICD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in T1 values from baseline to follow-upThrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concentration of NT-Pro-BNPThrough study completion, an average of 1 year
Concentration of Troponin TThrough study completion, an average of 1 year
New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationThrough study completion, an average of 1 year
Type of AVRThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearSAVR or TAVR
Native valveThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve
Left ventricular volumesThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy cardiac magnetic resonance
Left ventricular massThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy cardiac magnetic resonance
Left ventricular strainThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography
Late gadolinium enhancementThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy cardiac magnetic resonance
Extracellular volumeThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy cardiac magnetic resonance
Left ventricular ejection fractionThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography
Left atrial sizeThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography
e' velocityThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy echocardiography
Tricuspid regurgitation velocityThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy echocardiography
E/e' ratioThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearBy echocardiography

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026