Skip to content

Prevention of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis

Comparison of Two Skin Protection Regimes for the Prevention of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis in Geriatric Care: an Exploratory Trial (PID)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05403762
Acronym
PID
Enrollment
220
Registered
2022-06-03
Start date
2022-08-19
Completion date
2025-02-06
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incontinence-associated Dermatitis

Keywords

Skin care, Long-term care, Nursing home resident, Erythema, Geriatric medicine

Brief summary

Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is an inflammation of the skin caused by prolonged direct contact of the skin with urine and/or stool. Elderly and care-dependent people are often affected by this type of inflammation. Gentle skin cleansing and the use of skin protection products are recommended. Available skin protection products can be categorized into film-forming or lipophilic skin protectants depending on the ingredients and overall composition. There is no evidence about the superiority of one product compared to another regarding skin protection. The overall aim of this study is to compare the effects of two skin protection products compared to an untreated control group. An exploratory trial in elderly nursing home residents and geriatric patients will be conducted.

Detailed description

Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is an inflammation of the skin caused by prolonged and direct contact of the skin with urine and/or stool. It may occur in all age groups but elderly and care-dependent incontinent people are often affected by this type of inflammation. Promotion of continence, use of absorbent products and structured skin care are recommended to prevent and/or treat IAD. Available skin protection products can be categorized into film-forming or lipophilic skin protectants depending on the ingredients and overall composition. Currently, there is no evidence about the superiority of one product compared to another regarding skin protection. The overall aim of this study is to compare the effects of two skin protection products compared to an untreated control group. An exploratory randomized controlled trial in incontinent elderly nursing home residents and geriatric patients will be conducted. In the two intervention groups, a film-forming or a lipophilic skin protection product will be applied in addition to standardized skin care regimens. Every other day, investigators will perform skin inspections, including instrumental skin measurements to quantify erythema for a total study period of n= 14 days. IAD- related pain and itch will be assessed. A total of n= 210 nursing home residents and geriatric patients in Berlin, Germany, aged over 65 years, who are affected by urinary and faecal incontinence without signs of severe IAD will be included.

Interventions

OTHERESENTA™ Skin Barrier Spray (ConvaTec, UK)

The skin protectant will be applied on clean and dry skin exposed to urine and stool. After application, the solvent evaporates leaving a silicone film on the skin surface.

OTHERHydrophobes Basisgel DAC

The skin protectant will be applied on clean and dry skin. It contains 95% paraffin oil and creates a hydrophobic layer on the skin surface.

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Geriatric patients or residents being incontinent of urine and stool * Expected minimum length of stay of 14 days at the care facility * Intact skin with no clinical signs of IAD OR * intact skin with early clinical signs of IAD (IAD category 1A) * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Residents/patients at the end of life * Residents/Patients with IAD category 1B, 2A, 2B and/or signs of clinical infection in the IAD area * Any skin condition or wounds (at investigational areas of the skin) requiring additional treatment (e. g. pressure ulcers, intertrigo, infection) * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to silicones and/or topical leave-on products * Topical treatments in the IAD area.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis (IAD)14 DaysNumber of subjects developing IAD of all subjects (cumulative incidence). Classification of IAD according to Ghent Global IAD Categorisation Tool (GLOBIAD) (Category 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B). The GLOBIAD categorises IAD severity based on visual inspection of the affected skin areas. Category 1A: Persistent redness without clinical signs of infection Category 1B: Persistent redness with clinical signs of infection Category 2A: Skin loss without clinical signs of infection Category 2B: Skin loss with clinical signs of infection

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Erythema (Instrumental Measurement)14 DaysErythema measured with the Mexameter MX® 18 (Courage + Khazaka, Cologne, Germany). Means of two duplicate measurements per skin area are displayed in arbitrary units (AU) ranging from 0 (= no erythema) to 999 (= extreme erythema).
Erythema (Visual Inspection)14 DaysClinical rating of erythema is conducted according to the item 'Redness' of the incontinence-associated dermatitis and its severity (IADS) instrument. The 3-Item-Scale describes 'Redness' as (1) none, (2) pink, (3) red/ bright red.
Incidence of Erosion14 DaysThe presence (no or yes) of erosion is defined according to the latest International League of Dermatological Societies glossary of cutaneous lesions as a loss of either a portion of or the entire epidermis. Number of subjects developing erosions of all subjects (cumulative incidence).
Incidence of Maceration14 DaysThe presence (no or yes) of maceration is defined as the result of prolonged exposure (of the skin) to moisture and causes the skin to soften and breakdown so that the connective fibres can be teased apart and the skin often exhibits a white appearance. Number of subjects developing maceration of all subjects (cumulative incidence).
IAD Related Pain14 DaysNumeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score. The NRS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. The NRS was administered only to participants without cognitive impairment (MMSE ≥24).
Incidence of IAD Related Itch14 DaysIAD related itch will be reported directly by patients (yes or no). Number of subjects reporting itch of all subjects (cumulative incidence).
Presence of Local Intolerances14 DaysThe presence of local intolerances will be assessed with the following options: (0) None; 1. homogeneous redness with scattered papules; 2. homogeneous redness and homogeneous infiltration 3. homogeneous redness and infiltration with vesicles 4. homogeneous redness and infiltration with coalescing vesicles
Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)14 DaysAEs and SAEs will be documented and reported according to the current regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices (MDR) Article 2.
Incidents and Serious Incidents14 DaysIncidents abd serious incidents will be documented according to the definition of the EU regulation 2017/745 MDR Article 2 and reported to the Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJan Kottner, Prof.

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted in the federal state of Berlin, Germany. Recruitment and study procedures took place in 20 geriatric care units, including two inpatient wards in acute care hospitals and 18 long-term care facilities. Participant recruitment was conducted from August 2022 to January 2025, and follow-up for all study outcomes, including potential harms, was completed in February 2025.

Pre-assignment details

53/220 individuals were excluded before randomisation for the following reasons: * not meeting the inclusion criteria (n = 20; for example, a pre-existing wound at the investigational area), * unavailability at baseline screening (n = 12), * discharge or absence at baseline (n = 7), * terminal condition or death (n = 7), * declined participation (n = 2), * other reasons (n = 5).

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous82.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Barthel Index25.4 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1
Body Mass Index (BMI)25.2 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Care level
Care level 1
1 Participants
Care level
Care level 2
6 Participants
Care level
Care level 3
35 Participants
Care level
Care level 4
25 Participants
Care level
Care level 5
17 Participants
Care level
None
2 Participants
Care level
Unknown
2 Participants
Cognitive Ability
MMSE < 24
42 Participants
Cognitive Ability
MMSE ≥ 24
12 Participants
Diarrhoea5 Participants
Erythema
None
1 Participants
Erythema
Pink
21 Participants
Erythema
Red/Bright red
1 Participants
Erythema level265 AU
STANDARD_DEVIATION 91
IAD-related itch2 Participants
IAD-related pain2 Participants
Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD)
IAD Category 1A present
8 Participants
Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD)
No IAD
49 Participants
Location of IAD 1A
Back
4 Participants
Location of IAD 1A
Both
1 Participants
Location of IAD 1A
Front
5 Participants
Maceration
Back
3 Participants
Maceration
Front
0 Participants
Maceration
None
18 Participants
Main Medical Diagnoses
Dementia
26 Participants
Main Medical Diagnoses
Diabetes mellitus
13 Participants
Main Medical Diagnoses
Heart arrhythmia
16 Participants
Main Medical Diagnoses
Hypertension
34 Participants
Main Medical Diagnoses
Renal failure
23 Participants
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)9.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Satisfaction7.3 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
Urinary tract infection9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 570 / 570 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 570 / 570 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 570 / 570 / 53

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026