Skip to content

Effect of Topical Application of Hyaluronic Acid on Stability of Immediate Loading Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla

Effect of Topical Application of Hyaluronic Acid on Stability of Immediate Loading Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05403099
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-06-03
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2020-03-01
Last updated
2022-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Missing Teeth

Keywords

Hyaluronic Acid, dental implant

Brief summary

Effect of Topical Application of Hyaluronic Acid on Stability of Immediate Loading Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla

Detailed description

Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group I (Control group): Ten implants were placed in posterior maxilla and immediately loaded. Group II (Study group): Ten implants were coated with HA before placement in posterior maxilla and immediately loaded.

Interventions

OTHERHyaluronic acid

immediate placement of dental implant after topical application of hyaluronic acid on implant surface

immediate placement of dental implant without application of hyaluronic acid on implant surface

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Twenty implants were inserted in patients seeking for replacement of missed single or multiple posterior maxillary teeth. Patients were divided randomly into two groups. In the control group, ten implants were placed and immediately loaded. While in the study group, ten implants were coated with hyaluronic acid (HA) immediately before placement and immediately loaded. All patients were clinically evaluated at implant placement time, one, three and six months after loading regarding implant stability. Peri-implant pocket depth and modified sulcus bleeding index were evaluated clinically at six months in all patients. Bone density was evaluated radiographically after three months. All clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Highly motivated patients with good oral hygiene. * Age 18 years or older. * Adequate alveolar bone volume at the implant site, at least 6mm in width and 15 mm in height. * Free from any parafunctional habits

Exclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from any systemic or local disease that contraindicate implant placement or surgery. * Pregnancy. * Smokers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implant stabilityimmediately after surgeryusing radiofrequency analysis
bone densitythree monthsbone density around the implant is measured in cone beam computed tomography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
bleeding inexsix monthsModified sulcus bleeding index
propping depthsix monthsThe distance between the gingival margin and the base of the pocket

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026