Skip to content

Implementation of Upper Gi Endoscopy Preparation: Fasting Versus Lumevis

Implementation of Upper Gi Endoscopy Preparation: RCT Fasting Versus Lumevis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05401383
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-06-02
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
2023-03-31
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

EGDS Preparation; Fasting; Lumevis

Brief summary

One of the major problems for the endoscopist during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) is the presence of foam, bubbles, mucus and saliva, whether small or large, which can compromise correct endoscopic visibility. Endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract, like that of the lower gastrointestinal tract, requires optimal visualization of the mucosa. It is clear that endoscopic vision is often hindered by the presence of bubbles and foam: multiple aspirations alternating with intraprocedural washes are therefore necessary, which lengthen the time necessary for the endoscopic examination. Nowadays there's no universal raccomandation about a specific preparation before EGDS. The aim of our study is to compare fasting versus the use of simethicone premedication in combination with N-acetyl- cysteine and acetic acid (LumevisTM). The study is observational, randomized 1:1, and double blind. Primary outcomes are: grade of mucosa visualization defined by visual analogue scale (0-10) for each analyzed segment (esophagus, stomach and duodenum). Secondary aims: general patient satisfaction defined by visual analogue scale, eventual adverse events, duration of the exam.

Interventions

DEVICELumevis (IIa class)

intake of Lumevis 30 minutes before EGDS

Sponsors

Azienda USL Modena
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients that underwent EGDS

Exclusion criteria

* previous upper GI surgery * previous endoscopic bariatric procedures * known upper GI stenosis (benign and malign) * previous diagnosis of achalasia or motility disorders * diabetes * allergy to one of lumevis components * cystinuria * fasting not correctly respected * pregnant or brest-feeding women * urgent-emercengy setting * inpatients * patients who don't give their consent to partecipate to the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
grade of mucosa visibility6 monthsevalueted by VAS after the exam (it will be recorded a video) by a physician that not performed the exam and that are blinded about the randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
general patient satisfaction6 monthsevalueted by VAS at the end of the exam, before the discharge to home
eventual adverse events6 monthsevalueted by ASGE lexicon, at the end of the exam, before the discharge to home
duration of the exam6 monthsminutes between intubation and extubation of the endoscope from the mouth

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMauro Manno
m.manno@ausl.mo.it0039 059659250

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026