Skip to content

Traveling-wave Transcranial Electric Stimulation

Precision Transcranial Electric Stimulation for the Therapy of Cognitive Impairment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05399381
Acronym
TravelingTES
Enrollment
34
Registered
2022-06-01
Start date
2022-09-05
Completion date
2025-02-01
Last updated
2026-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Working Memory

Brief summary

This study will assess the impact of traveling wave transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on working memory performance in adults.

Detailed description

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can non-invasively alter neuroelectric activity in the brain by applying weak time-varying electric currents via the scalp. Complex patterns of electric brain activity can take the form of traveling waves - spatially coherent brain rhythms that gradually propagate through the neocortex. Traveling waves are crucial for the temporal coordination of informational flow in the brain. Using the novel traveling-wave transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) approach, the investigators will explore the effects of frontal-to-parietal and parietal-to-frontal traveling waves on working memory performance and brain electrophysiology in adults.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Non-invasive, multi-electrode transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over frontal and parietal brain areas.

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Randomized, within-subject crossover assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 18 and 45 years old. 2. Confident level of English language.

Exclusion criteria

1. History or evidence of chronic neurological or mental disorder. 2. Metal or electric implant in the head, neck, or chest area. 3. History of head injuries with loss of consciousness. 4. Any acute or chronic medical condition that requires ongoing pharmacological treatment. 5. Pregnancy or breast-feeding. 6. Alcohol or drug addiction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Working Memory Accuracy (N-back Task)During each stimulation block (approximately 20 minutes per block) in two study sessions conducted on separate days and separated by a minimum 48-hour washout period.Accuracy (proportion of correct responses) during performance of the N-back working memory task within each stimulation block. Values represent absolute task performance during active or sham stimulation in a within-subject crossover design.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Reaction TimeDuring each stimulation block (approximately 20 minutes per block) in two study sessions conducted on separate days and separated by a minimum 48-hour washout period.Reaction time (milliseconds) during performance of the N-back working memory task within each stimulation block. Values represent absolute reaction time during active or sham stimulation conditions in a within-subject crossover design
Theta-band Frontoparietal EEG Phase Connectivity (dwPLI)Resting-state EEG was recorded immediately before and immediately after each stimulation block in two sessions conducted on separate days (≥48-hour washout).Frontoparietal phase synchronization in the theta band (4-7 Hz), quantified using the debiased weighted Phase-Lag Index (dwPLI) between frontal and parietal electrode pairs. Connectivity values range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating stronger phase synchronization

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORIvan Alekseichuk, PhD

University of Minnesota

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 34 participants were enrolled in the study. Of these, 29 participants completed all study procedures and received all stimulation conditions.

Pre-assignment details

All participants were assigned to a single randomized within-subject crossover arm. Each participant completed two study sessions separated by a washout period, receiving two active stimulation conditions per session. Across both sessions, every participant received all four active stimulation conditions exactly once. Counts shown for individual conditions are session-specific and do not represent separate treatment arms.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 290 / 290 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 290 / 290 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 290 / 290 / 29

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 21, 2026