Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Plastic, Covered and Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stents in the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstructions (NEOSTENT)

Efficacy and Safety of Plastic, Covered and Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stents in the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstructions (NEOSTENT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05395013
Acronym
NEOSTENT
Enrollment
3149
Registered
2022-05-27
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2022-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Common Bile Duct Stricture, Jaundice; Malignant

Keywords

Biliary Stent, Jaundice, Pancreatic cancer, Common bile duct cancer

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the various types of stents available for biliary drainage in patients with neoplastic stenosis of the common bile duct and to evaluate the adherence to the current guidelines available.

Detailed description

Biliary drainage before surgery or chemotherapy is a common practice in patients with neoplastic stenosis of the common bile duct, often required by the presence of clinical conditions such as the onset of cholangitis or severe jaundice. The endoscopic approach has now been identified by the literature as the preferential drainage route, due to a lower incidence of adverse effects, liver or intraperitoneal metastases and lower costs associated with this technique compared to percutaneous drainage. The latest guidelines from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommend the placement of a 10 mm diameter self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) as the first choice for endoscopic drainage in patients with extra-hepatic biliary stenosis of neoplastic origin. Compared to plastic stents, SEMS placement is associated with a lower risk of developing stent dysfunction and/or cholangitis, lower risk of reintervention, and better patient survival. However, among the various types of metal stents available, to date there is no agreement on which type is the most suitable, as data on efficacy and post-interventional morbidity and mortality of the fully or partially covered and uncovered metal stents are contradictory. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the various types of stents available for biliary drainage in patients with neoplastic stenosis of the common bile duct and to evaluate the adherence to the current guidelines available.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Common bile duct stricture (i.e. jaundice and/or cholangitis) of malignant origin * Patients \> 18 years old * Obtaining informed consent

Exclusion criteria

\- Lack of sufficient clinical and laboratory data to define clinical efficacy and/or follow-up available \<1 month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bilirubin decreaseFrom 2017 to 2021Rate of resolution of obstructive jaundice in short and long term (i.e. maintenance of patency and/or the need for reintervention) of the different types of biliary stent placed in patients with neoplastic stenosis of the common bile duct

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of adverse eventsFrom 2017 to 2021Rate of periprocedural complications (i.e. bleeding, pancreatitis, cholecystitis) after biliary stent placement
Rate of endoscopic reinterventionFrom 2017 to 2021Rate of stent disfunction requiring an additional endoscopic procedure
Rate of biliary cannulation and successful stent placementFrom 2017 to 2021Rate of biliary cannulation and successful stent placement

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026