Skip to content

Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Oncologic Thigh Surgery

Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Oncologic Thigh Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05393726
Enrollment
75
Registered
2022-05-26
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2024-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perioperative Pain

Keywords

Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block, postoperative pain

Brief summary

This is a prospective; double blinded randomized controlled trial that will be conducted on cancer patients subjected to oncologic thigh surgery.The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block and lumbar erector spinae plane block in oncologic thigh surgery.Patients will be randomized into three equal comparable groups, Group A (Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB)), Group B (Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB)), and Group C (control group). Primary outcome parameter is the total postoperative morphine consumption over the first 24 hours postoperative. Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Detailed description

Pain is one of the most common and significant postoperative events experienced by many surgical patients. Orthopedic surgery is a relatively painful surgery due to the significant amount of bone and soft tissue resection, damage, and reconstruction. After thigh surgery for sarcomas, the patient may experience any of three distinct types of pain, including acute postoperative pain, persistent long-term nociceptive pain, and neuropathic pain related to intraoperative nerve injuries. The management of pain in limb sparing surgery patients and amputated patients is crucial during the rehabilitation program and often its approach is multidisciplinary. The ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block further built on earlier anatomic discoveries to more reliably anesthetize the three nerves: femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator. The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block has evolved as an effective means of providing analgesia to the thigh, the knee, and, most notably, the hip. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane block reported in the treatment of postoperative pain from surgical procedures, ranging from shoulder to hip surgery. When performed at the lumbar 4th vertebral level, ESPB led to sensorial blockage between Th12 and L4 dermatomes lead to effective postoperative analgesia in hip and proximal femoral surgery. Although supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block and L-ESPB successfully reduced postoperative opioid consumption in previous study, no study has ever compared their efficacy in postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing oncologic thigh surgery under general anesthesia. Thus, in this randomized comparative study we are aiming to fill this gape in the literature.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block

Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block group will receive ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block injection 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with 2 ml of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml. Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block group will receive ultrasound-guided lumber erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) injection 40 ml bupivacaine 0.25% mixed with 2 ml of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml. control group will underwent surgery under general anesthesia and receive the perioperative routine protocol of analgesia

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-65 years. * Physical status: ASA II,III * Patient undergoing oncologic thigh surgery under general anesthesia. * Body mass index (BMI): 20-40 kg/m 2

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusal. * Sensitivity or contraindication to local anesthetics. * Bleeding tendency due to coagulopathy. * Patients with opioid dependence or alcohol or drug abuse. * Patients with psychiatric illness that prevent them from proper perception and assessment of pain. * Contraindication to regional anesthesia e.g. local infection at the site of block, coagulopathy with INR more than 1.6: hereditary (e.g. hemophilia, fibrinogen abnormalities & deficiency factor II) acquired (e.g. impaired liver functions with PC less than 60%, vitamin K deficiency & therapeutic anticoagulant drugs) . * Significant renal insufficiency (plasma creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative morphine consumption .over the first 24 hours postoperativeTotal postoperative morphine consumption over the first 24 hours postoperative.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
fentanyl consumption.intra-operativeTotal intra-operative fentanyl consumption.
The time of first rescue analgesia.over the first 24 hours postoperativeThe time of first rescue analgesia.
Visual Analogue Scaleover the first 24 hours postoperativePain will be assessed using Visual Analogue Scale, both at rest and during movement, pain scores using visual Analogue Scale will be recorded in the post anesthesia care unit and for the next 24 hours postoperative.score (0) means no pain, scores(1-3) are considered mild pain, (4-6) moderate pain and (7-10) severe pain

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026