Skip to content

Upright Position During First Stage of Labour

Effect of Upright Position During First Stage of Labour On Labour Outcome: An Evidence Based Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05392660
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-05-26
Start date
2019-01-02
Completion date
2020-03-27
Last updated
2022-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effects of Movement

Keywords

First stage of labor, Upright position, Labor outcomes

Brief summary

There are several physiological advantages for being upright during labour. These include the effect of gravity on the fetus within the uterus; reduced risk of aorto-caval compression this maximizes uterine blood flow to the placenta and fetus during labour and more efficient contractions which lead to shorter first and second stage of labor. In addition, being upright during labour provide better alignment of the fetus; and increased pelvic outlet when the woman is in squatting and kneeling positions

Interventions

OTHERassumed upright position during first stage of labor

The study group assumed one of upright positions during first stage of labor, defined as walking , sitting, standing, kneeling & squatting positions )

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

Allocation of the women to study or control group was carried out through a person not involved in the study nurses in charge during the shift. This allocation was concealed from person allocating a woman into the trial (nurses)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primipara parturient women who admitted to delivery unit; * in early active phase of 1st stage of labor (not more than 4cm), * age between 20-35 years, * had a single, viable, and full term (≥ 37 weeks), * with normal fetal heart rate pattern (120-160 b/min), * fetus in occipto anterior position * free from medical or obstetrical disorders that may interrupt labor progress

Exclusion criteria

* Any women out of inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensity of labor pain assessed by Visual analogue pain intensity scaleduring the procedureAssessment of labor pain assessed by VAS (Visual analogue pain intensity scale ).It is a self-reported 10 cm horizontal line which represented the subjective estimation of pain intensity. It comprised 0-10-point numerical scale, No pain (0), Mild pain (\< 4), Moderate pain (4-6), Sever pain (7-10).
duration of first stage of laborduring the procedureupright position may decrease the duration of first stage of labor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
duration of second stage of laborimmediately after interventionupright position may decrease the duration of second stage of labor
fetal outcomeduring the procedurefetal well being through fetal heart rate assessment assessed by CTG (cardio toco graph ) machine
Neonatal outcomeimmediately after interventionneonatal condition after delivery assessed by a standardized APGAR score tool by allocating scores to five simple criteria Activity (Muscle tone), Pulse (Heart rate), Grimace (reflex irritability) Appearance (Skin color) & Respiratory effort (breathing). A total score (0-3) revealed sever neonatal distress, (4-7) indicated moderate distress & (8-10) indicated absence of difficulty in adjusting to extra uterine live.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026