Skip to content

Stress Management in College Students

Optimizing Stress Management in College Students

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05392621
Enrollment
46
Registered
2022-05-26
Start date
2022-06-02
Completion date
2023-03-31
Last updated
2025-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress

Keywords

yoga, deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation

Brief summary

Stress is defined as a response to one's evaluation of physical, emotional, or environmental challenges or demands. While the experience of stress is common, chronic exposure to high levels of stress is associated with a host of negative interrelated psychological, physiological, and behavioral outcomes. Mental health problems such as anxiety and depression have a high correlation with stress. In addition, chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease are also thought to be related to stress. For instance, research shows that stress increases blood lipids by changing cholesterol levels eventually leading to arterial thrombosis and stroke. While stress affects individuals across their lifespan, college students face a unique combination of academic and life challenges that exacerbate their experience of stress, making them highly susceptible to high levels of stress. Additionally, technological advances such as social media can be a source of chronic stress for many. As exposure to high levels of persistent stress is likely to predispose young adults to a lifetime of poor health and unhealthy behaviors, this is especially imperative in finding low impact and attainable methods of stress management for this population. Although a significant body of literature has addressed stress reduction techniques, most studies to date focus on intervention effects that accumulate over months of exposure, with many stress management programs lasting at minimum of 8 weeks. Previous research has found that interventions employing yoga, progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), and deep breathing exercise (DBE) significantly reduce stress levels. The relationship between yoga and stress reduction has been especially consistent across studies. It has been suggested that mindfulness may be the active agent in such programs. Intriguingly, Fountain et al., (2019) found a single 20-minute yoga session significantly decreased stress levels in college students. This raises the question of whether yoga, PMR, and/or DBE require repeated exposure to provide helpful stress-reducing effects, or whether benefits may be obtained in a single session. If so, college students who are unable to commit to an 8-week program will still benefit tremendously from a toolbox of stress reduction techniques, especially during high-stress periods (e.g., finals). The purpose of this study is to examine whether an acute bout of yoga, PMR, and DBE, delivered alone and in combination, are feasible and acceptable components in a single-session stress-reduction program for college students, and to explore initial effects on stress. We will use an efficient factorial design to gather data on the feasibility and acceptability of each of these three components, and to explore the initial main effects on stress.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALYoga

A single Hatha yoga session designed to support stress management.

BEHAVIORALDeep Breathing

A single deep breathing exercise session designed to elicit relaxation and to assist in stress management.

BEHAVIORALProgressive Muscle Relaxation

A single session of progressive muscle relaxation designed to elicit relaxation.

BEHAVIORALQuiet sitting

A single session of quiet sitting.

Sponsors

Wake Forest University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a 2x2x2 randomized factorial pilot trial. Participants will be randomized to receive one of 8 possible combinations of yoga (yes/no), progressive muscle relaxation (yes/no), or deep breathing (yes/no).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Undergraduate college students * Aged 18 -24 years * Capable of engaging in physical activity as assessed via the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q+) * Willing to provide consent and attend a single stress intervention session lasting up to 60 minutes * Agree to all study procedures and assessments

Exclusion criteria

* Outside of 18-24 years of age * Unable to safely engage in physical activity * Not an undergraduate student at Wake Forest University * Unwilling to complete study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment YieldBaselineNumber consented/number contacted
Completion RateThe day following the sessionNumber completed/number consented
Acceptability of the intervention as assessed by surveyEnd of sessionFeedback survey of aspects of the program participants enjoyed and disliked

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived StressPre-intervention, immediately preceding the single intervention session, immediately after completing the single intervention session, and 1 day after the single intervention sessionThe Perceived Stress Scale: A 10-item scale assessing the participants' perceived stress with final scores falling between 0 and 40 such that higher scores reflect more stress.
Perceived acceptability of the intervention package as assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)End of sessionA 4-item survey assessing perceived acceptability of a combination of intervention components
Positive and negative affectPre-intervention, immediately preceding the single intervention session, immediately after completing the single intervention session, and 1 day after the single intervention sessionThe Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): An 20-item assessment of both positive and negative affect. The final scores are given on two subscales (positive affect and negative affect) ranging from 10-50 such that lower scores represent less of the affective state (i.e., less positive or negative affect) and 50 representing more of the affective state (i.e., more positive or negative affect).
Perceived feasibility of delivering the intervention as assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)End of sessionA 4-item survey assessing perceived feasibility of a combination of intervention components
Perceived appropriateness of the intervention package as assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)End of sessionA 4-item survey assessing perceived appropriateness of a combination of intervention components

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026