Skip to content

Effect of taVNS on Abdominal Pain and Other Symptoms in Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

The Efficacy and Mechanisms of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Abdominal Pain and Other Symptoms in Patients With Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05392439
Enrollment
42
Registered
2022-05-26
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
2020-12-15
Last updated
2022-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Abdominal Pain

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the effects and possible mechanisms of transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) on abdominal pain and other symptoms in patients with IBS-C.

Detailed description

This study is designed as an early-feasibility, single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT), in which subjects are consented, undergo a baseline assessment, and receive taVNS or sham-taVNS treatment twice a day (8 a.m. and 8 p.m.) for 30 minutes each time for a period of 4 weeks. The taVNS and sham-taVNS treatment was applied using the commercially-available Transcutaneous Electrical Applicator device (Model SNM-FDC01, Ningbo MedKinetic Medical Device Co., Ltd.) with the skin electrodes placed bilaterally on auricular concha. The patients are requested to score the abdominal pain (using VAS) and complete BSFS, IBS-SSS, IBS-QOL, SAS, and SDS forms every week and fill out the bowel diary during taVNS or sham-taVNS. Emergency medications (Macrogol 4000 and pinaverium) are permitted for use when the patient cannot tolerate symptoms of constipation and abdominal pain.

Interventions

DEVICEtaVNS

transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation

transcutaneous stimulation at the elbow area

Sponsors

Shanghai East Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tongji University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. willing to sign a written informed consent form 2. met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for IBS-C

Exclusion criteria

1. history of previous abdominal surgery (other than appendectomy) 2. presence of carcinoma 3. any organic diseases causing constipation or neurologic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, rachischisis, Parkinson's disease, or spinal cord injury 4. taking antidepressant agents including tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors 5. serious concomitant disease of the heart, liver, kidney, or diabetes 6. pregnancy or lactation 7. participating in another trial or enrolled in a trial during the past month 8. allergic reaction to surface electrodes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in аbdominal pain between sham and active taVNS4 weeksWeekly average of daily patient-assessed abdominal pain using the visual analog scale (VAS). VAS ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no abdominal pain and 10 indicating the maximal pain. Efficacy is evaluated as an improvement of ≥ 30%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in IBS symptom severity scale (IBS-SSS) between sham and active taVNS4 weeksQuestionnaire consists of 5 questions (abdominal pain intensity, abdominal pain frequency, abdominal distension degree, defecation satisfaction, and interference with quality of life), with a total score of 500 points and a higher score indicating a worse condition. Scores \< 175 represent mild IBS symptoms, scores 175-300 represent moderate severity, and scores \> 300 represent severe IBS.
Change in IBS quality of life (IBS-QOL) between sham and active taVNS4 weeksQuestionnaire is composed of 8 dimensions (dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health concerns, food avoidance, social reaction, sex, and relationships), with 34 items assessing the degree to which IBS interferes with the patient's quality of life. Each item is evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 34 to 170 and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Change in Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) between sham and active taVNS4 weeksThe scale has 7 points according to stool type, from the hardest (1) to the softest (7). The lower the score, the more severe is constipation.
Change in Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score between sham and active taVNS4 weeksSDS questionnaire has 20 items to assess physical and psychological symptoms, using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (none, or a little of the time) to 4 (most, or all of the time), with a total score ranging from 20 to 80. SDS scores below 50 indicate no depression, from 50 to 59 - mild depression, from 60 to 69 - moderate depression, 70 and above - severe depression.
Change in complete spontaneous bowel movements per week between sham and active taVNS4 weeksNumber of bowel movements that occur without use of any medication or other methods to assist defecation and with a feeling of complete evacuation
Change in Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score between sham and active taVNS4 weeksSAS questionnaire has 20 items to assess physical and psychological symptoms, using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (none, or a little of the time) to 4 (most, or all of the time), with a total score ranging from 20 to 80. SAS scores below 50 indicate no anxiety, from 50 to 59 - mild anxiety, from 60 to 69 - moderate anxiety, 70 and above - severe anxiety.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in autonomic function assessed by the spectral parameters of heart rate variability between sham and active stimulation4 weeksHeart rate variability parameters are calculated using spectral analysis of R-R intervals in electrocardiogram (ECG)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026