Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods

Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05390996

Enrollment

Registered

2022-05-25

Start date

2022-01-05

Completion date

2023-01-31

Last updated

2022-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant Stability

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Osseodensification on implant stability during the healing period The objective of this study is to compare between dental implant stability after osteotomy site preparation using osseodensification technique and conventional drilling technique immediately after implant installation (primary stability) , 6 week after the insertion of implant and 12 weeks later (secondary stability)

Interventions

OTHERdental implant placement

dental implant placement by using a different drilling techniques

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. medically fit patients ≥ 18 years of age including both genders 2. alveolar ridges of sufficient vertical and horizontal dimensions 3. bone density less than 850 Hounsfield units (HU) which corresponds to D3-D5 bone density according to Misch bone classification based on preoperative CBCT findings

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with high bone density (more than 850 HU which corresponds to D1 and D2 according to Misch classification are not suitable for osseodensification. 2. Patient with severe buccal plate undercut or concavity 3. Active infection or inflammation in the implant zone 4. Presence of any uncontrolled systemic diseases. 5. Any patient need advance treatment such as sinus lifting and bone augmentation.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
primary stability	0 day (baseline)	Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100
stability at the dip period	6 week post surgery	Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100
secondary stability	12 week post surgery	Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100

Countries

Iraq

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026