Skip to content

University of California Health Remote (Home) Monitoring Evaluation

Evaluation of a University of California-wide Quality Improvement Effort to Improve Blood Pressure Control Using Remote (Home) Monitoring

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05390502
Enrollment
660
Registered
2022-05-25
Start date
2023-03-28
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring

Brief summary

This study sets out to evaluate a University of California-wide (Davis, San Francisco, and Los Angeles) quality improvement initiative to increase remote (home) blood pressure monitoring and improve blood pressure control for persons with hypertension. Participants at each site will be randomized to one of two types of remote monitoring: integrated versus manual. Participants using the integrated monitoring will have their home blood pressure readings sent directly to their participating health systems. Participants using the manual monitoring will record their own blood pressures and report them to their health care system as per usual care.

Detailed description

Hypertension is an important modifiable risk factor for numerous adverse health outcomes including cardiovascular and kidney disease. In 2017, about 45.3% of US adults had hypertension or were taking antihypertensive medications (1). Hypertension has historically been diagnosed and treated using office-based blood pressure measurements, however blood pressure may differ when measured in the office compared to the home setting. Because of this discrepancy, and an extensive body of evidence supporting remote monitoring, national guidelines for hypertension management now recommend that all persons with hypertension participate in remote (home) monitoring. (2) This study sets out to evaluate a University of California-wide (Davis, San Francisco, and Los Angeles) quality improvement initiative to increase remote (home) blood pressure monitoring and improve blood pressure control for persons with hypertension. Participants at each site will be randomized to one of two types of remote monitoring: integrated versus manual. Participants using the integrated monitoring will have their home blood pressure readings sent directly to their participating health systems. Participants using the manual monitoring will record their own blood pressures and report them to their health care system as per usual care. The investigators hypothesize that remote monitoring (both integrated and manual) will be associated with improved blood pressure control and that there will be no difference in control between type of remote monitoring. Aim 1: Evaluate whether this remote blood pressure quality improvement initiative leads to improved blood pressure control. Aim 2: Compare the impact of integrated versus manual remote monitoring on blood pressure control. The primary outcome measures will be: 1) the difference in blood pressure after six months (adjusted for baseline variables), and 2) whether participants achieved greater than or equal to 5 mmHg change in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Outcomes will be compared between participants in each arm to determine whether one type of monitoring is superior to the other. The investigators will convene bi-monthly meetings with site champions to foster communication and learning across sites and to learn about variation across sites.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALmanual monitoring and general education on use

Patients will receive a standard blood pressure monitor and education on how to use it. Data will be reported as part of usual care.

BEHAVIORALintegrated monitoring and local wrap-around hypertension program

Patients will receive a standard blood pressure monitor and a local wrap-around hypertension program. Data will be sent directly to their participating health system.

Sponsors

University of California Office of the President- Quality and Population Health Management
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of California, Davis
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Francisco
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years and older. * Participant must be willing and functionally able (with help from another person if needed) to both use the remote BP monitoring device as well as do home BP monitoring using a manual BP cuff. * Have access to the online healthcare portal (with help from another person if needed). •-Have outpatient visit within the last 12 months, and have a prior visit within 6 months of inclusion outpatient visit with diagnosis of hypertension, defined as having two readings of SBP \> 140 or DBP \> 90 mmHg * Has visit with a primary care physician within one year. * Takes zero or three anti-hypertensive prescriptions (can include pills with 2 different drugs so could be on 2 medications).

Exclusion criteria

* BP \> 180/110 mmHg (office) or \> 175/105 mmHg (self-measured BP measurements) * Pheochromocytoma * Uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism * Renal artery stenosis * Conn's syndrome * End stage renal disease (ESRD) * Chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 3b (CrCL \< 45) and above * Transplant patients --\> used the code that if they ever had a transplant * Pregnancy * Severe aortic stenosis * Hospice/End-of-life or Palliative Care * Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction \< 30% * Acute cardiac event in the last 3 months (e.g. acute MI) * Heart block and arrhythmia(s) * Recurrent or symptomatic hypotension (SBP \< 100 mmHg or DBP \< 60 mmHg) * Drug/alcohol abuse * Orthostatic hypotension (drop in SBP \>20 mmHg) * Other secondary causes of hypertension * Receiving hypertension management from other services (home health, hospice, already enrolled in hypertension management program) * White coat hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Continuous change in blood pressure (BP)Baseline, six monthsthe difference in systolic blood pressure after six months (adjusted for baseline variables)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Binary 5mm change in blood pressureBaseline, six monthswhether participants achieved greater than or equal to 5 mmHg change in systolic blood pressure
Binary measure of controlled vs uncontrolled hypertensionBaseline, six monthswhere uncontrolled is defined as SBP \> 130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \> 80 mmHg.
Exploratory pre-post analysis of overall change in BPBaseline, six monthsfor all participants, subanalysis for select demographics including elderly.
Changes in blood pressure (BP) outcomes from integrated monitor readingsBaseline, six monthsFor participants in the integrated device study arm, we will calculate the change between the baseline BP and the latest BP reading that is recorded via the remote device.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse eventsBaseline, six monthsacute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic), decompensated heart failure, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, syncope, hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026