Skip to content

Impact of Partial Capsule Decortication on Device-related Infection in Patients Receiving Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Replacement

Impact of Partial Capsule Decortication on Device-related Infection in Patients Receiving Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Replacement: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05390216
Acronym
STERILE
Enrollment
1016
Registered
2022-05-25
Start date
2022-06-05
Completion date
2030-05-31
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infections, Pacemaker Complication

Brief summary

Increasing number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have been implanted in the worldwide every year, which is accompanied by the growing number of CIED-related infection, especially in patients with CIED replacement. This multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial is to confirm the impact of partial capsule decortication on device-related infection in patients receiving CIED replacement.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPartial capsule decortication

The anterior wall of the capsule was removed during the operation.

Sponsors

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is at least 18 years of age * Patient is planned to undergo at least one of the following procedures: a) Patient has existing CIED (pacemaker, or CRT-P, or ICD, or CRT-D) and is undergoing pulse generator replacement or upgrade with a new generator. b) Patients planned to have leads added, or extracted and added for upgrades. * Patient is willing to sign and date informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of CIED-related infection * Open the pocket for any reason within the last one year * Any evidence indicating active infection * Requirement of long term vascular access for any reason * Expected survival time is less than one year * Patients who were pregnant or breastfeeding * Participation in another study that may confound the results of this study * Patient is unable to comply with scheduled follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of major CIED-related infectionWithin the first year after the operationInfections that resulted in CIED system removal, an invasive CIED procedure (e.g., pocket revision without removal), treatment with long-term antibiotic therapy (if the patient was not a candidate for system removal) with infection recurrence after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy, or death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of minor CIED-related infectionWithin the first year after the operationInfections that do not meet the definition criteria of major CIED infection.
Rate of all CIED-related infectionWithin the first year after the operationAll infections that related to CIED operation.
Rate of pocket hematomaWithin the first year after the operationPalpable swelling with fluctuance that extended beyond the device margin but without evidence of infection.
Rate of device dysfunctionWithin the first year after the operationAll the dysfunction of the generators and leads (including abnormal changes of pacing threshold, sensing, impedance, etc.).
All-cause mortalityWithin the first year after the operationDeath regardless of the causes.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026